A Simple Question for Barack, Earned

[jreeves]

It could possibly be that many in our gubment leak like colanders.............?

Evidentily you want to distract from Obama's record. But his record remains the same....
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR8p0bro9RM&feature=user[/ame]

 

[nibor]

Evidentily you want to distract from Obama's record. But his record remains the same....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR8p0bro9RM&feature=user

I'll give you a buck and a half for his rookie card..........................

 

[jreeves]

That the Huffington Post illegally reported or falsely misrepresented?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR8p0bro9RM&feature=user[/ame]

 

[Gunny]

Heaven forbid we call crap crap.

Let's see - black backround, bust-shot of a veteran insubstantially criticizing a Democratic presidential candidate, the name-formula "Veterans for X," and transparently false claims of neutrality: "Paid for by Vets for Freedom Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee."

What exactly is your point? You aren't explaining how this is legitimate or okay, just whining because you don't like it when we say "swiftboating." Why is that so upsetting? Didn't you think the swift boat vets were honest, genuine guys?

Let's take a look at the overall message of this ad: Obama is a trojan horse in league with terrorists. Wow, that's pretty much a conspiracy theory.

It's real simple. Like every other thing, it isn't that the term was used, it's that you've beat it to death and 99% of the time misuse it as part of the usual leftwingnut rhetoric rotation.

The fact is, you can't even prove they lied, as is noted by snopes, as was posted by a liberal on this board cherrypicking what she wanted that it DID say so. It doesn't.

It's just another jingoisitic phrase you lefties use as some sort of end to an argument without having to make a real argument in regard to the topic.