The movie For Greater Glory is a: Phyllis Schlafly goes on to say: Obama Censors the Declaration of Independence Phyllis Schlafly Jul 3, 2012 Obama Censors the Declaration of Independence - Phyllis Schlafly - Page 1 Ms. Schlafly is absolutely correct; so I asked myself why Americans think it cant happen here? My first answer came in the form of another question: Why hasnt it happened yet? The answer to that question is relatively easy: UNREGISTERED guns in the hands of tens of millions of private sector Americans. The Affordable Care Act according to John Roberts A very brief article (280 words) shows the lengths the government will go to in order to disarm private sector Americans. Heres one of the reasons I call it Hillarycare II: July 2, 2012 Can Government Now Tax Handgun Ammunition 10,000%? Michael Filozof Blog: Can Government Now Tax Handgun Ammunition 10,000%? Before the Supreme Court opened the door to taxing guns and ammunition out of existence, everything the federal government did to abolish the Second Amendment was usually obvious and could be fought in Congress and state legislatures; not so with justification. The findings of a recent study FUNDED by the DHS is a clear attempt to justify abolishing the Second Amendment: Feds label liberty lovers 'terrorists' ... again! Warns of right-wingers 'suspicious of centralized federal authority' Published: 15 hours ago Feds label liberty lovers terrorists again! Hanging onto the Second Amendment is the best chance Americans have of holding tyranny at bay. When all of the legal and philosophical arguments have been made CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED UNREGISTERED GUNS is a matter of self-interest. So far, the SCOTUS has upheld the Second Amendment. John Roberts sneaky tax decision signals a dramatic shift in the way the Court decides Second Amendment cases in the future. As Ive said many times, the High Court is part of the government. The SCOTUS will never rule to diminish the governments authority over private Americans even when there is no opening that empowers the government. Roberts absurd behavior can be taxed ruling provides an omnipotent opening. To be more precise Roberts closed every opening in opposition to totalitarian government. You might ask yourself why Americans are being asked to die fighting tyranny in foreign lands while marching quietly down the road to tyranny in their own country? If you are squeamish about the questions implications think of unregistered guns as a deterrent. The Second Amendment aside there is a deeper question that should be asked: Why are Democrats doing it? The simple answer is because they cant mind their own business. Eric Hoffers great observation applies to Socialists much more than it applies to the followers of an organized religion: To know a person's religion we need not listen to his profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance. Organized religions were never a threat to individual liberties in America. Before Socialists began their campaign to install their own religion as the states religion no one was forced to join a church, or support a religion not of their own choosing. Freedom of religion as it was practiced in America before Socialists infiltrated the highest levels of government basically said live and let live. Busybodies abhor the very concept of letting others live their lives as they see fit. Live and let live is their intolerance. There is a more complex answer to the question Why are Democrats doing it? They want to do exactly what Mexican President Plutarco Elias Calles did in 1926. Finally, Ive noticed that Republicans are laying a foundation for not repealing Hillarycare II: Jul 2, 6:35 PM EDT Minority leader: Odds long to undo health care law News from The Associated Press And, to no ones surprise, media stooges are saying the Supreme Court should be respected irrespective of how one feels about a decision. That is the same crap they spread around about respecting the office of president. In truth, there is no good reason to respect any institution, or individual, that is hellbent on implementing a totalitarian government.