A Sad Day for Truthers......Another 9-11 Aniversary

[DiveCon]

divecon thinks "components "equal buildings and small unknown projectiles equal a "plane"

moron, they are NOT unknown
they were engines and landing gear
they are KNOWN components you fucking moron
'

 

[DiveCon]

Do you believe an event that has never happened before or since 9/11/01, the fire-induced collapse of steel-framed skyscrapers, occurred three times on one day AND 19 terrorists armed with box-cutters were primarily responsible?

that is incorrect
it has happened since
the madrid building all the steel only componants did collapse
the central core and lower levels didnt because they had a concrete core
different construction means different outcome

the Madrid towers remained standing after fires far more intense it never collapsed...once again divecon is in contradiction to the nist report that states the wtc 7 was the only building to ever collapse primarily due to fire

the parts of the Madrid towers that were of similar construction, FAILED
|the parts that were not didnt
you remain a pathetic dipshit

 

[eots]

divecon believes there are many videos showing planes flying all the way through the twin towers...divecon is in denial...or delusional...or a liar

 

[DiveCon]

divecon believes there are many videos showing planes flying all the way through the twin towers...divecon is in denial...or delusional...or a liar

you are a pathetic liar

 

[eots]

that is incorrect
it has happened since
the madrid building all the steel only componants did collapse
the central core and lower levels didnt because they had a concrete core
different construction means different outcome

the Madrid towers remained standing after fires far more intense it never collapsed...once again divecon is in contradiction to the nist report that states the wtc 7 was the only building to ever collapse primarily due to fire

the parts of the Madrid towers that were of similar construction, FAILED
|the parts that were not didnt
you remain a pathetic dipshit

divecon contradicts the theory he claims to support..divecon thinks portions of a building still under construction falling is the same a a global collapse of a entire structure...divecon is very wrong

 

[DiveCon]

the Madrid towers remained standing after fires far more intense it never collapsed...once again divecon is in contradiction to the nist report that states the wtc 7 was the only building to ever collapse primarily due to fire

the parts of the Madrid towers that were of similar construction, FAILED
|the parts that were not didnt
you remain a pathetic dipshit

divecon contradicts the theory he claims to support..divecon thinks portions of a building still under construction falling is the same a a global collapse of a entire structure...divecon is very wrong

you remain the pathetic liar

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65Qg_-89Zr8]YouTube - Bad Ass Skyscraper Fires and Destruction!! Awesome!![/ame]



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A]YouTube - wtc 7 collapse[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

more bullshit youtube videos

 

[Jos]

that is incorrect
it has happened since
the madrid building all the steel only componants did collapse
the central core and lower levels didnt because they had a concrete core
different construction means different outcome

the Madrid towers remained standing after fires far more intense it never collapsed...once again divecon is in contradiction to the nist report that states the wtc 7 was the only building to ever collapse primarily due to fire

the parts of the Madrid towers that were of similar construction, FAILED
|the parts that were not didnt
you remain a pathetic dipshit

Before

Here is a building in Madrid After http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_Tower

 

[DiveCon]

the Madrid towers remained standing after fires far more intense it never collapsed...once again divecon is in contradiction to the nist report that states the wtc 7 was the only building to ever collapse primarily due to fire

the parts of the Madrid towers that were of similar construction, FAILED
|the parts that were not didnt
you remain a pathetic dipshit

exactly
the steel part collapsed
the concrete core did NOT

 

[daveman]

divecon thinks "components "equal buildings and small unknown projectiles equal a "plane"

Considering the stupid shit you believe, you have no room to point fingers.

 

[georgephillip]

the parts of the Madrid towers that were of similar construction, FAILED
|the parts that were not didnt
you remain a pathetic dipshit

exactly
the steel part collapsed
the concrete core did NOT

Are you saying there is no steel visible in the above photo?

How do the rubble piles from Madrid and WTC7 compare?

One day.
2 planes.
3 steel framed rubble piles.
19 terrorists with boxcutters.
?$billions in war on terror profit?

 

[eots]

divecon thinks "components "equal buildings and small unknown projectiles equal a "plane"

Considering the stupid shit you believe, you have no room to point fingers.

You mean like scattered office fires cant cause a global collapse of a steel framed skyscrapers at near free fall speed ???

 

[daveman]

divecon thinks "components "equal buildings and small unknown projectiles equal a "plane"

Considering the stupid shit you believe, you have no room to point fingers.

You mean like scattered office fires cant cause a global collapse of a steel framed skyscrapers at near free fall speed ???

I mean like "The WTC was a controlled demolition!!"

That's stupid shit.

 

[SFC Ollie]

divecon thinks "components "equal buildings and small unknown projectiles equal a "plane"

Considering the stupid shit you believe, you have no room to point fingers.

You mean like scattered office fires cant cause a global collapse of a steel framed skyscrapers at near free fall speed ???

 

[eots]

Yes ollie thats exactly what they were and confined to a few floors of the overall builduing

 

[eots]

Loss of structural integrity was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue. [Ch. 5, p. 31.][1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center

 

[DiveCon]

Yes ollie thats exactly what they were and confined to a few floors of the overall builduing

BULLSHIT

there were several floors fully engulfed in fire

 

[SFC Ollie]

Loss of structural integrity was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue. [Ch. 5, p. 31.][1

7 World Trade Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fires burned into the afternoon on the 11th and 12th floors of 7 World Trade Center, the flames visible on the east side of the building.[30][31] During the afternoon, fire was also seen on floors 6–10, 13–14, 19–22, and 29–30.[4] In particular, the fires on floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 continued to burn out of control during the afternoon.[32] At approximately 2:00 p.m., firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse.[33] During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.[34] Around 3:30 pm FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro decided to halt rescue operations, surface removal, and searches along the surface of the debris near 7 World Trade Center and evacuate the area due to concerns for the safety of personnel.

7 World Trade Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Although we both know that we can make wiki say anything we want.....

 

[georgephillip]

Does Wiki have anything to say about David Chandler's 2.25 seconds of free-fall acceleration that WTC7's roof- line experienced over a distance of eight stories?

"NIST initially denied the fact of free-fall in its final draft report released in August 2008. In the technical briefing that followed, NIST’s lead investigator, Shyam Sunder explained, 'A free-fall time would be an object that has no structural components below it.'

"He claimed that WTC7 took 40% longer than 'free-fall
time' to collapse, 'and that is not at all unusual because there was structural resistance that was provided in this particular case.

"'And you had a sequence of structural failures that had to take place and everything was not instantaneous.'”

To be precise

"...more than 400 structural steel connections had to fail per second, evenly all across each of the eight floors involved.

These failures had to occur ahead of the collapsing section – NOT caused by it – because a free-falling object cannot exert force on anything in its path without slowing its own fall."

It was David Chandler's work that forced NIST to finally acknowledge free fall.

If there is a single "smoking gun" relating to WTC7, free-fall gets my vote.

Republic Magazine #16 P.23