Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"That's no different than saying that shooting an adult in a certain place is not murder. Both babies are at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder? There is no difference between the one that was born and the one that was aborted except location.Because one is bornBoth babies were at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder?Havent you posted this before?
The woman who killed her child murdered it. The one who had an abortion removed a fetus.
When you eat scrambled eggs from a fertilized chicken egg, do you say you are eating scrambled eggs or scrambled chicken?
We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
I just see it is basic biology.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"That's no different than saying that shooting an adult in a certain place is not murder. Both babies are at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder? There is no difference between the one that was born and the one that was aborted except location.Because one is bornBoth babies were at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder?
We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
Well...I’m just not sure how to view it any other way. I mean, it’s like anything else I suppose...one can twist and steer just about anything to fit their own belief systems. But in the real world us sane peeps call that method excuse making and lying for justification.
Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"That's no different than saying that shooting an adult in a certain place is not murder. Both babies are at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder? There is no difference between the one that was born and the one that was aborted except location.Because one is born
We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
like these...
Yeah, we get it. You're a mewling beta who wets himself upon the sight of a strong women.
Not all Trump cultists are bedwetting pajama boys, but many are. The Trump cult attracts men who lack gonads, because it promises to protect them from everything that scares them, which is everything in the whole world.
The video is of a strong woman, those pictures are of worthless pussies who cant get a man because liberal men are as pussy as they are.sight of a strong women
Stop trying to use logic with the liberals, because liberals have no logic at all. Just thank them for executing over 300,000 future democrat voters a year by having planned parenthood abort babies by the 10's of thousands. Soon there wont be a democrat party because the liberals hate babies, born or unborn..,.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"That's no different than saying that shooting an adult in a certain place is not murder. Both babies are at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder? There is no difference between the one that was born and the one that was aborted except location.
We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Again, an UNBORN baby is not capable of that. Take the baby out, and it can.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"That's no different than saying that shooting an adult in a certain place is not murder. Both babies are at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder? There is no difference between the one that was born and the one that was aborted except location.
We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
You dont even know what a liberal is. You call regressives liberals all the time.Stop trying to use logic with the liberals, because liberals have no logic at all. Just thank them for executing over 300,000 future democrat voters a year by having planned parenthood abort babies by the 10's of thousands. Soon there wont be a democrat party because the liberals hate babies, born or unborn..,.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Yep. Liberal and logic should never be used in the same sentence. It's an oxymoron.Stop trying to use logic with the liberals, because liberals have no logic at all. Just thank them for executing over 300,000 future democrat voters a year by having planned parenthood abort babies by the 10's of thousands. Soon there wont be a democrat party because the liberals hate babies, born or unborn..,.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Both babies are identical except for location. Both are fully developed except for gaining weight. Both of them sleep and even dream. Both can sense and react to their environment. Once again, your only defense is location. Again, Ludicrous. You're an idiot.Again, an UNBORN baby is not capable of that. Take the baby out, and it can.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Thats why i said the killing of the born was murder and not the unborn.
I honestly dont see how my opinion is that confusing.
You relate being completely dependent on another life to breath and consume is like a place. That is absurd. That "place" is what keeps it alive. Without it, the unborn will die. Or take it out and then it can be independent completing basic human functions.
Again, not complicated.
A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"That's no different than saying that shooting an adult in a certain place is not murder. Both babies are at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder? There is no difference between the one that was born and the one that was aborted except location.Because one is born
We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Liberals know that they are taking a life when they have an abortion. How else to you explain the number of women who attempt suicide after having an abortion? But the life of their child is less important to them than their own convenience.A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"That's no different than saying that shooting an adult in a certain place is not murder. Both babies are at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder? There is no difference between the one that was born and the one that was aborted except location.
We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Seems most states consider it murder if you kill the 'fetus' when you kill the mother.
man arrested for killing unborn babies - Yahoo Search Results
If you really think a mothers belly is nothing more than "location" there is no sense in discussing this with you. Either you failed first grade science or you are willfully blinded.. Just aint worth it. Good day.Both babies are identical except for location. Both are fully developed except for gaining weight. Both of them sleep and even dream. Both can sense and react to their environment. Once again, your only defense is location. Again, Ludicrous. You're an idiot.Again, an UNBORN baby is not capable of that. Take the baby out, and it can.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Thats why i said the killing of the born was murder and not the unborn.
I honestly dont see how my opinion is that confusing.
You relate being completely dependent on another life to breath and consume is like a place. That is absurd. That "place" is what keeps it alive. Without it, the unborn will die. Or take it out and then it can be independent completing basic human functions.
Again, not complicated.
I know. Thats not the same thing, though. The mother alone has the right to decide whether to rid herself of the unborn. Not someone else.A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"That's no different than saying that shooting an adult in a certain place is not murder. Both babies are at the same stage of development. So why is one murder and the other not murder? There is no difference between the one that was born and the one that was aborted except location.
We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Seems most states consider it murder if you kill the 'fetus' when you kill the mother.
man arrested for killing unborn babies - Yahoo Search Results
The liberal name was hijacked by the Marxists/Progs and today I call them liberals. Don't like it , take it to THEM and tell them to stop...You dont even know what a liberal is. You call regressives liberals all the time.Stop trying to use logic with the liberals, because liberals have no logic at all. Just thank them for executing over 300,000 future democrat voters a year by having planned parenthood abort babies by the 10's of thousands. Soon there wont be a democrat party because the liberals hate babies, born or unborn..,.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
If you can't comprehend the fact that there is no difference between a child in the womb and one that has been born prematurely, then you are willfully blinded. Just ain't worth it. Good day. PUNK!If you really think a mothers belly is nothing more than "location" there is no sense in discussing this with you. Either you failed first grade science or you are willfully blinded.. Just aint worth it. Good day.Both babies are identical except for location. Both are fully developed except for gaining weight. Both of them sleep and even dream. Both can sense and react to their environment. Once again, your only defense is location. Again, Ludicrous. You're an idiot.Again, an UNBORN baby is not capable of that. Take the baby out, and it can.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Thats why i said the killing of the born was murder and not the unborn.
I honestly dont see how my opinion is that confusing.
You relate being completely dependent on another life to breath and consume is like a place. That is absurd. That "place" is what keeps it alive. Without it, the unborn will die. Or take it out and then it can be independent completing basic human functions.
Again, not complicated.
The only way that will happen is if saturday night live does a skitThe liberal name was hijacked by the Marxists/Progs and today I call them liberals. Don't like it , take it to THEM and tell them to stop...You dont even know what a liberal is. You call regressives liberals all the time.Stop trying to use logic with the liberals, because liberals have no logic at all. Just thank them for executing over 300,000 future democrat voters a year by having planned parenthood abort babies by the 10's of thousands. Soon there wont be a democrat party because the liberals hate babies, born or unborn..,.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
If you can't comprehend the fact that there is no difference between a child in the womb and one that has been born prematurely, then you are willfully blind. Just ain't worth it. Good day. PUNK!If you really think a mothers belly is nothing more than "location" there is no sense in discussing this with you. Either you failed first grade science or you are willfully blinded.. Just aint worth it. Good day.Both babies are identical except for location. Both are fully developed except for gaining weight. Both of them sleep and even dream. Both can sense and react to their environment. Once again, your only defense is location. Again, Ludicrous. You're an idiot.Again, an UNBORN baby is not capable of that. Take the baby out, and it can.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etc
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Thats why i said the killing of the born was murder and not the unborn.
I honestly dont see how my opinion is that confusing.
You relate being completely dependent on another life to breath and consume is like a place. That is absurd. That "place" is what keeps it alive. Without it, the unborn will die. Or take it out and then it can be independent completing basic human functions.
Again, not complicated.
Question for you. If a 28 week fetus is not alive, then what is it? By every medical definition known to man, it is alive.If you can't comprehend the fact that there is no difference between a child in the womb and one that has been born prematurely, then you are willfully blind. Just ain't worth it. Good day. PUNK!If you really think a mothers belly is nothing more than "location" there is no sense in discussing this with you. Either you failed first grade science or you are willfully blinded.. Just aint worth it. Good day.Both babies are identical except for location. Both are fully developed except for gaining weight. Both of them sleep and even dream. Both can sense and react to their environment. Once again, your only defense is location. Again, Ludicrous. You're an idiot.Again, an UNBORN baby is not capable of that. Take the baby out, and it can.Both babies are capable of existing outside the womb. There's some basic biology for you. Your only defense is that the location determines whether one is alive or not. Ludicrous!
Thats why i said the killing of the born was murder and not the unborn.
I honestly dont see how my opinion is that confusing.
You relate being completely dependent on another life to breath and consume is like a place. That is absurd. That "place" is what keeps it alive. Without it, the unborn will die. Or take it out and then it can be independent completing basic human functions.
Again, not complicated.
Hackery hates the most BASIC science and logic. If it didnt, it wouldnt exist.
Here is a link to a photo of an aborted 28 week old fetus. Take a good look and tell me it is not a person. I dare you.I know. Thats not the same thing, though. The mother alone has the right to decide whether to rid herself of the unborn. Not someone else.A fetus isnt capable until it comes out. Until then, it isnt capable of the most basic human functions. Such as consumption, breathing etcBoth the fetus and the one that was born are capable of living outside the womb. Your assertion that one is a person and the other is not defies all logic and common sense. But neither one is your strong point.Independency for basic human function is "semantics?"We all know the answer...disgusting, lowlife Liberals believe one is not a human until they’ve exited the vaginal canal. You know how LefTards are...they love semantics...they use it as a tool to justify their subhuman behavior and ideologies. It’s what they do.
Wow ok lol
You can say basic biology defies logic if you want. It makes you look illogical.
Seems most states consider it murder if you kill the 'fetus' when you kill the mother.
man arrested for killing unborn babies - Yahoo Search Results
Last post to your hack ass todayQuestion for you. If a 28 week fetus is not alive, then what is it? By every medical definition known to man, it is alive.If you can't comprehend the fact that there is no difference between a child in the womb and one that has been born prematurely, then you are willfully blind. Just ain't worth it. Good day. PUNK!If you really think a mothers belly is nothing more than "location" there is no sense in discussing this with you. Either you failed first grade science or you are willfully blinded.. Just aint worth it. Good day.Both babies are identical except for location. Both are fully developed except for gaining weight. Both of them sleep and even dream. Both can sense and react to their environment. Once again, your only defense is location. Again, Ludicrous. You're an idiot.Again, an UNBORN baby is not capable of that. Take the baby out, and it can.
Thats why i said the killing of the born was murder and not the unborn.
I honestly dont see how my opinion is that confusing.
You relate being completely dependent on another life to breath and consume is like a place. That is absurd. That "place" is what keeps it alive. Without it, the unborn will die. Or take it out and then it can be independent completing basic human functions.
Again, not complicated.
Hackery hates the most BASIC science and logic. If it didnt, it wouldnt exist.
