A question for the pro-life conservatives of the board

[Pedro de San Patricio]

Sorry after what you posted you showed that you are a far left drone..

So what you're saying is that your opposition to an economic system trumps your dedication to human life?

Not saying anything at all, just pointing out that so far anyone wants to discuss are fallacies..

I would prefer to discuss the question and the scenario behind it. She aborted her child because, economically, she had to. She didn't have the education or tools to prevent the pregnancy and had no chance of affording it. This would not have happened had you been willing to pay for providing her that education, those tools, and her life should they have failed. The choice is between paying for her child and allowing her child to die. Are you willing to back up your ideals with your wallet?

"A question for the pro-life conservatives of the board"

Everyone is pro-life, liberal and conservative, everyone is opposed to abortion, liberal and conservative – the conflict concerns how to end the practice, where most on the right advocate 'banning' abortion in violation of the Constitution, thus increasing the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty.

If conservatives would propose a solution to the problem of abortion that comports with the Constitution and its case law, they would receive 100 percent support from across the political spectrum.

This would be a far better world if you were being honest. Liberals sure as shit doesn't want to end the practice when they want to defend, fund, and expand it. I wanted to see if the conservatives who call themselves pro-life are any different in practice. They claim so much, but now they have the chance to prove it by paying for the woman's education, training, pregnancy, and child themselves.

 

[Kosh]

Sorry after what you posted you showed that you are a far left drone..

So what you're saying is that your opposition to an economic system trumps your dedication to human life?

Not saying anything at all, just pointing out that so far anyone wants to discuss are fallacies..

I would prefer to discuss the question and the scenario behind it. She aborted her child because, economically, she had to. She didn't have the education or tools to prevent the pregnancy and had no chance of affording it. This would not have happened had you been willing to pay for providing her that education, those tools, and her life should they have failed. The choice is between paying for her child and allowing her child to die. Are you willing to back up your ideals with your wallet?

You are wanting an all or nothing discussion.

Even your question to me proves that.

So do you believe that all abortion should be legal and paid for by the state? even the woman wants to terminate that pregnancy the day before her due date?

 

[Kosh]

"A question for the pro-life conservatives of the board"

Everyone is pro-life, liberal and conservative, everyone is opposed to abortion, liberal and conservative – the conflict concerns how to end the practice, where most on the right advocate 'banning' abortion in violation of the Constitution, thus increasing the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty.

If conservatives would propose a solution to the problem of abortion that comports with the Constitution and its case law, they would receive 100 percent support from across the political spectrum.

See how the far left claims that "most on the right advocate 'banning' abortion", even though they have no real evidence to support it other than their far left religious dogma..

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I'd be in favor of handing out BC pills and the morning after pill like Skittles.
As long as the tax payer bore no responsibility for raising someones rug rats.
You have a kid and cant pay for it? Tough shit,the kid goes to a foster home or state run home until 18.

 

[Pedro de San Patricio]

You are wanting an all or nothing discussion.

Even your question to me proves that.

It is by nature. You claim to be against abortion, right? You claim the label of being "pro-life". Exactly how far in practice are you willing to take this? What are you willing to give up for it? When you actually sit down and rack and stack all of your priorities what comes out on top?

I'd be in favor of handing out BC pills and the morning after pill like Skittles.
As long as the tax payer bore no responsibility for raising someones rug rats.
You have a kid and cant pay for it? Tough shit,the kid goes to a foster home or state run home until 18.

You have me at handing out birth control like Skittles, but immediately lost me after. Someone has to be responsible for raising this new human being. If it's not going to be their parents, and it won't be you, then who will it be? The broken foster care system? A shitty state run home where they'll grow up with next to nothing?

 

[Preacher]

Could you accept socialism if it meant less abortions were performed? Think about it. That unplanned pregnancy could have been prevented had the couple been provided sufficient contraception and the comprehensive sexual education to encourage its effective use. That woman wouldn't have went cold with terror when she saw the positive and knew she could barely support herself on her meager wage. She wouldn't have went to Planned Parenthood for advice if there were accessible trustworthy medical services in her area. She wouldn't have scheduled the appointment if she knew she wasn't going to get fired or have to take a second or third job just to make ends meet. Her child wouldn't have been another tally towards the clinic's quota if her society had been a positive, safe place to have and raise him. Now think of how her story could have been different had she been given the tools and resources to do so.

I am already a Racial Socialist and I am pro life. So yep!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You are wanting an all or nothing discussion.

Even your question to me proves that.

It is by nature. You claim to be against abortion, right? You claim the label of being "pro-life". Exactly how far in practice are you willing to take this? What are you willing to give up for it? When you actually sit down and rack and stack all of your priorities what comes out on top?

I'd be in favor of handing out BC pills and the morning after pill like Skittles.
As long as the tax payer bore no responsibility for raising someones rug rats.
You have a kid and cant pay for it? Tough shit,the kid goes to a foster home or state run home until 18.

You have me at handing out birth control like Skittles, but immediately lost me after. Someone has to be responsible for raising this new human being. If it's not going to be their parents, and it won't be you, then who will it be? The broken foster care system? A shitty state run home where they'll grow up with next to nothing?

No one said it had to be forever. When the parent showed the ability to take care of the child he/she could have them back.
If the parent doesnt have the money to raise a child,how would their home life be any better than in foster care?
The whole idea in my mind is to stop people from having kids for monetary gain and letting them grow up to be gang bangers and criminals.

 

[Kosh]

You are wanting an all or nothing discussion.

Even your question to me proves that.

It is by nature. You claim to be against abortion, right? You claim the label of being "pro-life". Exactly how far in practice are you willing to take this? What are you willing to give up for it? When you actually sit down and rack and stack all of your priorities what comes out on top?

I'd be in favor of handing out BC pills and the morning after pill like Skittles.
As long as the tax payer bore no responsibility for raising someones rug rats.
You have a kid and cant pay for it? Tough shit,the kid goes to a foster home or state run home until 18.

You have me at handing out birth control like Skittles, but immediately lost me after. Someone has to be responsible for raising this new human being. If it's not going to be their parents, and it won't be you, then who will it be? The broken foster care system? A shitty state run home where they'll grow up with next to nothing?

I make no claims, other than you are wanting an all or nothing discussion..

 

[NYcarbineer]

Conservatives LOVE Israel, where the government pays for abortions.

Go figure.

1. I agree.
2. I've never seen you post something that wasn't a tribalist talking point.

WOW! A far left drone agreeing with another far left drone..

Do you support Israel's policy of government funding of abortions? Or as you would call it, the murder of innocent human beings?

When you can post a question based on reality then I will answer it, but until you need to understand you post was in error and a far left talking point..

Does this look in error?

Israeli government offers women aged 20 to 33 free abortions - The Washington Post

 

[Kosh]

Conservatives LOVE Israel, where the government pays for abortions.

Go figure.

1. I agree.
2. I've never seen you post something that wasn't a tribalist talking point.

WOW! A far left drone agreeing with another far left drone..

Do you support Israel's policy of government funding of abortions? Or as you would call it, the murder of innocent human beings?

When you can post a question based on reality then I will answer it, but until you need to understand you post was in error and a far left talking point..

Does this look in error?

Israeli government offers women aged 20 to 33 free abortions - The Washington Post

And once again the far left drones do not read what they post..

It is not everyone nor is for all women in that group, but once again you show that your far left religion trumps reality.

 

[2aguy]

Could you accept socialism if it meant less abortions were performed? Think about it. That unplanned pregnancy could have been prevented had the couple been provided sufficient contraception and the comprehensive sexual education to encourage its effective use. That woman wouldn't have went cold with terror when she saw the positive and knew she could barely support herself on her meager wage. She wouldn't have went to Planned Parenthood for advice if there were accessible trustworthy medical services in her area. She wouldn't have scheduled the appointment if she knew she wasn't going to get fired or have to take a second or third job just to make ends meet. Her child wouldn't have been another tally towards the clinic's quota if her society had been a positive, safe place to have and raise him. Now think of how her story could have been different had she been given the tools and resources to do so.

sorry...doesn't work that way...in fact socialism creates the lack of morality that accepts abortion as being acceptable....