Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not so. If your work has a drug policy, at least in Oregon, it doesn't matter if you have a prescription or not.
Likewise, although you can get a prescription for it and get a grower's license to grow it, it doesn't matter. If you get busted, you are still busted.
"On October 19, 2009, the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) issued a memorandum to provide clarification and guidance to federal prosecutors in states that have authorized the medical use of marijuana. The guidance makes it clear that USDOJ is committed to prosecuting enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act, but that, as a general matter, federal resources in states with medical marijuana laws should not be focused on individuals who are "in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana." Prosecution of commercial enterprises that unlawfully market and sell marijuana for profit will continue to be a priority of USDOJ
"The guidance from USDOJ does not make the use of medical marijuana legal under federal law, and does not create a defense to a federal prosecution for a drug related offense."
Oregon Medical Marijuana Act - Legal Information
You're missing my point. Legalization. Currently, pot is against federal law and most state laws. If legalized federally, it makes a huge difference as it would be no different than alcohol. Now, can a company deny employment to someone who drinks or smokes pot? Sure they can.......but because it is against their policy, not because it is an illegal controlled substance. Look, I've been to many a work conference where everyone goes out in the evening and gets drunk on their ass and have hangovers the next morning during the conference. I've yet to see a single one of them get fired....because drinking is socially accepted. I think someday, pot will be made legal and no one will think twice about someone lighting up after dinner and going to work the next morning.
They might get fired if they smelled of alcohol and were asked to test, though.
You're missing my point. Legalization. Currently, pot is against federal law and most state laws. If legalized federally, it makes a huge difference as it would be no different than alcohol. Now, can a company deny employment to someone who drinks or smokes pot? Sure they can.......but because it is against their policy, not because it is an illegal controlled substance. Look, I've been to many a work conference where everyone goes out in the evening and gets drunk on their ass and have hangovers the next morning during the conference. I've yet to see a single one of them get fired....because drinking is socially accepted. I think someday, pot will be made legal and no one will think twice about someone lighting up after dinner and going to work the next morning.
They might get fired if they smelled of alcohol and were asked to test, though.
Yes, but the conferences I went to where this happened........management was as drunk as the employees. Drinking on your personal time and working just isn't frowned on as long as the drinking and being drunk isn't immediately before going to work. Hell, airline pilots can drink to their heart's content as long as they consume their last drink a set number of hours prior to flying.
Someday maybe kwc. However I will pour myself a drink in front of my kids, but I would never light up a joint around them - even if prescribed or legal. Two wrongs don't make a right.
I just read an article that claims that cannabis use can increase the risk of schizophrenia, especially amongst young people. Unintended consequences again. And the govt. is worried about salt?
This Schizophrenia Bulletin (2008) paper tells us:
Cannabis use is considered a contributory cause of schizophrenia and psychotic illness. However, only a small proportion of cannabis users develop psychosis. This can partly be explained by the amount and duration of the consumption of cannabis and by its strength, but also by the age at which individuals are first exposed to cannabis. Genetic factors, in particular, are likely to play a role in the short- and the long-term effects cannabis may have on psychosis outcome. Evidence suggests that mechanisms of gene-environment interaction are likely to underlie the association between cannabis and psychosis.
Pajamas Media Why I No Longer Support Decriminalizing Marijuana
Also good for people who have digestive/appetite issues and some who have anxiety issues.
Someday maybe kwc. However I will pour myself a drink in front of my kids, but I would never light up a joint around them - even if prescribed or legal. Two wrongs don't make a right.
I just read an article that claims that cannabis use can increase the risk of schizophrenia, especially amongst young people. Unintended consequences again. And the govt. is worried about salt?
This Schizophrenia Bulletin (2008) paper tells us:
Cannabis use is considered a contributory cause of schizophrenia and psychotic illness. However, only a small proportion of cannabis users develop psychosis. This can partly be explained by the amount and duration of the consumption of cannabis and by its strength, but also by the age at which individuals are first exposed to cannabis. Genetic factors, in particular, are likely to play a role in the short- and the long-term effects cannabis may have on psychosis outcome. Evidence suggests that mechanisms of gene-environment interaction are likely to underlie the association between cannabis and psychosis.
Pajamas Media Why I No Longer Support Decriminalizing Marijuana
In medical marijuana states, are there specific laws that deal with WORKING under the influence? Can a person be fired for smoking dope before work even if it is prescribed?
No flames please. I am concerned about how this will be handled in NJ in the near future.
I don't think marijuana increases the risk of schizophrenia. People who have schizophrenia enjoy cannabis, as well as meth and speed. It makes them feel more normal.
That's my concern Jon. I have no problem with a reasonable doctor prescribing a reasonable person with a reasonable illness with whatever works. But we all know there are plenty of docs who prescribe just about anything if the patient requests it. And unfortunately, my area is populated with a very, very, large group of substance abusers.
Once someone gets that card (and I'm thinking of 18 yr olds), they will be able to go to a dispensary and purchase whatever they need, no? And that's where the schools may have some problems.
I don't think it's likely that the privilege will be abused right away. But I'm thinking five years down the road - an idiocracy.
Unintended consequences.
How can you be certain that people that later develop schizophrenia are already trying to self-medicate at a young age?Someday maybe kwc. However I will pour myself a drink in front of my kids, but I would never light up a joint around them - even if prescribed or legal. Two wrongs don't make a right.
I just read an article that claims that cannabis use can increase the risk of schizophrenia, especially amongst young people. Unintended consequences again. And the govt. is worried about salt?
Pajamas Media Why I No Longer Support Decriminalizing MarijuanaThis Schizophrenia Bulletin (2008) paper tells us:
Cannabis use is considered a contributory cause of schizophrenia and psychotic illness. However, only a small proportion of cannabis users develop psychosis. This can partly be explained by the amount and duration of the consumption of cannabis and by its strength, but also by the age at which individuals are first exposed to cannabis. Genetic factors, in particular, are likely to play a role in the short- and the long-term effects cannabis may have on psychosis outcome. Evidence suggests that mechanisms of gene-environment interaction are likely to underlie the association between cannabis and psychosis.
Anxiety issues and back pain are the two ailments that most concern me Allie. Who doesn't claim to have that?
How can you be certain that people that later develop schizophrenia are already trying to self-medicate at a young age?Someday maybe kwc. However I will pour myself a drink in front of my kids, but I would never light up a joint around them - even if prescribed or legal. Two wrongs don't make a right.
I just read an article that claims that cannabis use can increase the risk of schizophrenia, especially amongst young people. Unintended consequences again. And the govt. is worried about salt?
Pajamas Media Why I No Longer Support Decriminalizing MarijuanaThis Schizophrenia Bulletin (2008) paper tells us:
Cannabis use is considered a contributory cause of schizophrenia and psychotic illness. However, only a small proportion of cannabis users develop psychosis. This can partly be explained by the amount and duration of the consumption of cannabis and by its strength, but also by the age at which individuals are first exposed to cannabis. Genetic factors, in particular, are likely to play a role in the short- and the long-term effects cannabis may have on psychosis outcome. Evidence suggests that mechanisms of gene-environment interaction are likely to underlie the association between cannabis and psychosis.
In other words, this study is flawed.
There are several other studies backing up the schizophrenia claim. I'll look for them later, but the risk is small. There are other risks that are much greater, like brain development in people under 25.
My point about anxiety and back pain is that anyone can CLAIM to have it even if it is not chronic. I don't pretend to know how easy or difficult it is to get a "card" but it's not like getting a 30 day prescription, is it? Isn't the card good forever?
That's why I am asking questions.
You'd rather punish people that are helped by it because some doctors might be unethical? That's what is sounds like you are saying.There are several other studies backing up the schizophrenia claim. I'll look for them later, but the risk is small. There are other risks that are much greater, like brain development in people under 25.
My point about anxiety and back pain is that anyone can CLAIM to have it even if it is not chronic. I don't pretend to know how easy or difficult it is to get a "card" but it's not like getting a 30 day prescription, is it? Isn't the card good forever?
That's why I am asking questions.
There are several other studies backing up the schizophrenia claim. I'll look for them later, but the risk is small. There are other risks that are much greater, like brain development in people under 25.
My point about anxiety and back pain is that anyone can CLAIM to have it even if it is not chronic. I don't pretend to know how easy or difficult it is to get a "card" but it's not like getting a 30 day prescription, is it? Isn't the card good forever?
That's why I am asking questions.