Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If it is state funds, yes....
So Papa Obama really is partners with God in matters of Life and Death?
No. In an ideal world that would not be the case.
Scenario:
1) The state has $1 billion to treat care.
2) It needs $2 billion to treat everybody
3) Your solution is....?
I just LOVE the provisions in all HC bills so far, allowing old folks who cannot afford health care insurance but own property -- like a house for example -- to sign over their property to the government to get treatment.
[
Death and decisions about death are, of course, inevitable. But, better for those choices to be by the individual and their doctors- not the state.
Some places to start for real changes that Papa Obama care does not:
don't penalize suicide
Tort reform
Allow competition across state lines
Allow more market forces
The left claims that socialized medicine will be fair and equal- very doubtful
Does anyone believe that the President and politicians are going to have the same level of care as the masses ?
We only need to look at how school vouchers are denied for poor children while the President sends his kids to private school to see that will not happen.
Socialism does not make it better; it only spreads misery equally, except for the "inner party " members. The proletariat has no way to improve their situation
At least with a free market, one has the opportunity to improves one's "lot in life"
If it is state funds, yes....
So Papa Obama really is partners with God in matters of Life and Death?
I love how you people like to twist this crap, especially when most of you don't understand end of life care.
[
Death and decisions about death are, of course, inevitable. But, better for those choices to be by the individual and their doctors- not the state.
Some places to start for real changes that Papa Obama care does not:
don't penalize suicide
Tort reform
Allow competition across state lines
Allow more market forces
The left claims that socialized medicine will be fair and equal- very doubtful
Does anyone believe that the President and politicians are going to have the same level of care as the masses ?
We only need to look at how school vouchers are denied for poor children while the President sends his kids to private school to see that will not happen.
Socialism does not make it better; it only spreads misery equally, except for the "inner party " members. The proletariat has no way to improve their situation
At least with a free market, one has the opportunity to improves one's "lot in life"
My country has both - public health and private.
So there will be no private health in the US anymore?
As an aside, pure socialism doesn't work....no western country has it....
Let's take your silly, biased, unproven scenario to the nth degree....What is the alternative?
She is allowed to make her own choices.
Are you talking about if she is insured, or if it is public money?
She is allowed to make her own choices.
Are you talking about if she is insured, or if it is public money?
Im saying that she, not the government, not anyone else should determine her health care.
Government isnt a solution to the problems we face, it is the problem.
What happened to coverage for all? Why would folks have to sign over their property to get treatment? Isn't health care a RIGHT according to the far-left?I just LOVE the provisions in all HC bills so far, allowing old folks who cannot afford health care insurance but own property -- like a house for example -- to sign over their property to the government to get treatment.
So you would rather they go bankrupt and loose their house anyways, and not get any compensation for their house?
Or how about the fact older people having to sell their house to pay for their private insurance bills? Is that alright?
What happened to coverage for all? Why would folks have to sign over their property to get treatment? Isn't health care a RIGHT according to the far-left?I just LOVE the provisions in all HC bills so far, allowing old folks who cannot afford health care insurance but own property -- like a house for example -- to sign over their property to the government to get treatment.
So you would rather they go bankrupt and loose their house anyways, and not get any compensation for their house?
Or how about the fact older people having to sell their house to pay for their private insurance bills? Is that alright?
Exactly, and what happens
The best medical resources are drawn to the private sector and become even more out the reach of the middle class- Sort of what you see in the US with public and private schools
Remember,
Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams chose to travel to the United States for heart surgery. He said "This was my heart, my choice and my health,"
Something that a lot of Canadians could not afford to do
She is allowed to make her own choices.
Are you talking about if she is insured, or if it is public money?
Im saying that she, not the government, not anyone else should determine her health care.
Government isnt a solution to the problems we face, it is the problem.
Rod Serling would of been appalled by someone like the OP.
Just sayin.
And property.Rod Serling would of been appalled by someone like the OP.
Just sayin.
And our Founders would have been appalled by the people pushing this unconstitutional seizure of power.
Rod Serling would of been appalled by someone like the OP.
Just sayin.
Exactly, and what happens
The best medical resources are drawn to the private sector and become even more out the reach of the middle class- Sort of what you see in the US with public and private schools
Remember,
Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams chose to travel to the United States for heart surgery. He said "This was my heart, my choice and my health,"
Something that a lot of Canadians could not afford to do
Isn't the best health care in the private sector anyway? Right now?
