A Message to the Revolution: The Easiest Way to Destroy a Movement is to Become It

Oh wake up. This is nothing more than the usual GOP hoodwinking of the anti-government people back into the party. The GOP promises to be a small government party, the stool eaters then believe them, and vote for them and disappointment soon follows. How much bigger is the government now than when the "Reagan Revolution" happened? Answer: much, much bigger.


Huh... WOW! You're RIGHT! Except that not a single principle on which the Reagan Revolution rested is at the foundation of a SINGLE element of goverment expansion, which the 'Shit-eaters' so vehemently contested...

So the growth of government and the ebbing of liberty CAN'T be a result of the "Shit-eaters'... and since 'Shit-eaters' is a deragatory term... reason suggests that YOU do not consider YOURSELF a 'Shit-eater'...

ROFL... So that leaves YOU as walking dead center amongst those who comprise that little concept known as THE PROBLEM...

CONGRATS dumbass, ya outted youself... LOL... don't feel bad sis... I doubt it was much of a secret.
 
What on earth does Ron Paul have to do with the Tea Parties? If he actually took a stand and refused to take earmarks maybe we wouldnt have to be having these parties.

It was Ron Paul and his supporters that started doing Tea Parties during his largely grassroots campaign, but back then many of those who supported these current round of Tea Parties were calling us "domestic terrorists."

If Ron Paul didn't take a single earmark then the same amount of money would be spent, except that none of the taxpayers in his district would see any benefit from their money being stolen from them.
 
What on earth does Ron Paul have to do with the Tea Parties? If he actually took a stand and refused to take earmarks maybe we wouldnt have to be having these parties.

It was Ron Paul and his supporters that started doing Tea Parties during his largely grassroots campaign, but back then many of those who supported these current round of Tea Parties were calling us "domestic terrorists."

If Ron Paul didn't take a single earmark then the same amount of money would be spent, except that none of the taxpayers in his district would see any benefit from their money being stolen from them.


That is a problem for any politician when the system has gotten out of control. One or two people can start a movement, but it takes a majority to see it through.
 
What on earth does Ron Paul have to do with the Tea Parties? If he actually took a stand and refused to take earmarks maybe we wouldnt have to be having these parties.

It was Ron Paul and his supporters that started doing Tea Parties during his largely grassroots campaign, but back then many of those who supported these current round of Tea Parties were calling us "domestic terrorists."

If Ron Paul didn't take a single earmark then the same amount of money would be spent, except that none of the taxpayers in his district would see any benefit from their money being stolen from them.

Yep... If Ron Paul didn't post a single ear mark, his constituents wouldn't be party to the theft of public treasure...

Now what's the down side there? That they don't enjoy the 'fruits' of tainted money; ill gotten gain?

I'd LOVE to have a governor and federal legislators that refused to take federal money... FOR ANYTHING... Schools, libraries, highways, lowways, hospitals... NOTHING... and what those of us that live here would discover VERY SOON, is that we survive JUST FINE, without it... and we could RIGHTEOUSLY look down upon the idiot leftists THAT STEAL FEDERAL TREASURE.

Here's a FACT: You're not entitled to ONE CENT of someone elses money... PERIOD. And that FACT doesn't change based upon your NEED and it doesn't change when someone elses money is pooled with your money...

This government is off the HOOK... out of control...
 
What on earth does Ron Paul have to do with the Tea Parties? If he actually took a stand and refused to take earmarks maybe we wouldnt have to be having these parties.

It was Ron Paul and his supporters that started doing Tea Parties during his largely grassroots campaign, but back then many of those who supported these current round of Tea Parties were calling us "domestic terrorists."

If Ron Paul didn't take a single earmark then the same amount of money would be spent, except that none of the taxpayers in his district would see any benefit from their money being stolen from them.

Yep... If Ron Paul didn't post a single ear mark, his constituents wouldn't be party to the theft of public treasure...

Now what's the down side there? That they don't enjoy the 'fruits' of tainted money; ill gotten gain?

I'd LOVE to have a governor and federal legislators that refused to take federal money... FOR ANYTHING... Schools, libraries, highways, lowways, hospitals... NOTHING... and what those of us that live here would discover VERY SOON, is that we survive JUST FINE, without it... and we could RIGHTEOUSLY look down upon the idiot leftists THAT STEAL FEDERAL TREASURE.

Here's a FACT: You're not entitled to ONE CENT of someone elses money... PERIOD. And that FACT doesn't change based upon your NEED and it doesn't change when someone elses money is pooled with your money...

This government is off the HOOK... out of control...

Well the federal government shouldn't be doling out money the way it does, so we're in agreement there. However, the government is going to spend the money regardless. I'd personally rather see our elected representatives deciding where that money should go than the President or some committee.
 
A little something Google is pirating from Rosetta Project.

19_Boston_Tea_Party.jpg
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top