A mangled Constitution

KokomoJojo · Sep 24, 2016

JakeStarkey said: ↑

KokomoJojo said: ↑

JakeStarkey said: ↑

"To leave such dishonest counting to a fractional part of Congress is dangerous in the extreme", however, is exactly what the Alt Right wants to do when SCOTUS is not in their corner" and "The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate authority on the meaning of the Constitution" comes directly from the long post above, #58 by kokomojo. The inherent inconsistency of those two statement render the post's logic null and void. The Alt Right wants total control, period.
Click to expand...

nah it renders your comprehension of his intended meaning null and void.
Click to expand...

So you can't handle the truth of the inconsistency of the two parts of the post. OK. Your inability does not render my conclusion invalid.
Click to expand...

I asked you what you are talking about, explain the inconsistency, there are many, which most likely wont change that you understood what I said out of context.

JakeStarkey · Sep 24, 2016

KokomoJojo said: ↑

JakeStarkey said: ↑

KokomoJojo said: ↑

JakeStarkey said: ↑

"To leave such dishonest counting to a fractional part of Congress is dangerous in the extreme", however, is exactly what the Alt Right wants to do when SCOTUS is not in their corner" and "The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate authority on the meaning of the Constitution" comes directly from the long post above, #58 by kokomojo. The inherent inconsistency of those two statement render the post's logic null and void. The Alt Right wants total control, period.
Click to expand...

nah it renders your comprehension of his intended meaning null and void.
Click to expand...

So you can't handle the truth of the inconsistency of the two parts of the post. OK. Your inability does not render my conclusion invalid.
Click to expand...

I asked you what you are talking about, explain the inconsistency, there are many, which most likely wont change that you understood what I said out of context.
Click to expand...

I did, you have not, and you don't get to glitz blitz, son. Explain clearly, and we can talk.

KokomoJojo · Oct 7, 2016

JakeStarkey said: ↑

KokomoJojo said: ↑

JakeStarkey said: ↑

KokomoJojo said: ↑

JakeStarkey said: ↑

"To leave such dishonest counting to a fractional part of Congress is dangerous in the extreme", however, is exactly what the Alt Right wants to do when SCOTUS is not in their corner" and "The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate authority on the meaning of the Constitution" comes directly from the long post above, #58 by kokomojo. The inherent inconsistency of those two statement render the post's logic null and void. The Alt Right wants total control, period.
Click to expand...

nah it renders your comprehension of his intended meaning null and void.
Click to expand...

So you can't handle the truth of the inconsistency of the two parts of the post. OK. Your inability does not render my conclusion invalid.
Click to expand...

I asked you what you are talking about, explain the inconsistency, there are many, which most likely wont change that you understood what I said out of context.
Click to expand...

I did, you have not, and you don't get to glitz blitz, son. Explain clearly, and we can talk.
Click to expand...

the gubmint created the problem in the first place

JakeStarkey · Oct 7, 2016

KokomoJojo said: ↑

JakeStarkey said: ↑

KokomoJojo said: ↑

JakeStarkey said: ↑

KokomoJojo said: ↑

JakeStarkey said: ↑

"To leave such dishonest counting to a fractional part of Congress is dangerous in the extreme", however, is exactly what the Alt Right wants to do when SCOTUS is not in their corner" and "The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate authority on the meaning of the Constitution" comes directly from the long post above, #58 by kokomojo. The inherent inconsistency of those two statement render the post's logic null and void. The Alt Right wants total control, period.
Click to expand...

nah it renders your comprehension of his intended meaning null and void.
Click to expand...

So you can't handle the truth of the inconsistency of the two parts of the post. OK. Your inability does not render my conclusion invalid.
Click to expand...

I asked you what you are talking about, explain the inconsistency, there are many, which most likely wont change that you understood what I said out of context.
Click to expand...

I did, you have not, and you don't get to glitz blitz, son. Explain clearly, and we can talk.
Click to expand...

the gubmint created the problem in the first place
Click to expand...

That's a start. Specifics, please.

Log in or Sign up

A mangled Constitution

KokomoJojo VIP Member

JakeStarkey BANNED Supporting Member

KokomoJojo VIP Member

JakeStarkey BANNED Supporting Member

Latest Threads

D-Swalwell: If We Come to Confiscate Your Guns & You Resist We Will NUKE You!

It’s official: Trump condones murder of Washpo journalist

Loggers support Trump's claim that wildfires caused by 'poor forest management'

Senators demand Trump say whether Saudi prince ordered Khashoggi killing

A Good Thread

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Log in or Sign up

A mangled Constitution

KokomoJojo VIP Member

JakeStarkey BANNED Supporting Member

KokomoJojo VIP Member

JakeStarkey BANNED Supporting Member

Latest Threads

D-Swalwell: If We Come to Confiscate Your Guns & You Resist We Will NUKE You!

It’s official: Trump condones murder of Washpo journalist

Loggers support Trump's claim that wildfires caused by 'poor forest management'

Senators demand Trump say whether Saudi prince ordered Khashoggi killing

A Good Thread

Share This Page

Useful Searches