A Legal Examination of the "Evidence" supporting AGW

[westwall]

This is pretty interesting reading.

A Lawyer’s Examination of the IPCC “Evidence” for Man-made Global Warming | The SPPI Blog

 

[konradv]

This is pretty interesting reading.

A Lawyer’s Examination of the IPCC “Evidence” for Man-made Global Warming | The SPPI Blog

That only challenges the most drastic of the time courses, but not the salient fact that CO2 and other GHGs trap energy. Given that Conservation of Energy is a basic scientific principle and statistically only half of that energy at most would be re-emitted into space, what's the rest of it doing, except to warm the earth?

 

[westwall]

This is pretty interesting reading.

A Lawyer’s Examination of the IPCC “Evidence” for Man-made Global Warming | The SPPI Blog

That only challenges the most drastic of the time courses, but not the salient fact that CO2 and other GHGs trap energy. Given that Conservation of Energy is a basic scientific principle and statistically only half of that energy at most would be re-emitted into space, what's the rest of it doing, except to warm the earth?

konrad,

You can flog your dead horse all you want but the preponderance of real scientific evidence shows otherwise. The real science shows that the heat comes first and then the CO increase.
You have an extremely limited vocabulary and the science you quote is wrong for the majority of what it claims.