A Legal Examination of the "Evidence" supporting AGW

Discussion in 'Environment' started by westwall, Jun 10, 2010.

  1. westwall
    Online

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    41,018
    Thanks Received:
    7,987
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,786
  2. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,674
    That only challenges the most drastic of the time courses, but not the salient fact that CO2 and other GHGs trap energy. Given that Conservation of Energy is a basic scientific principle and statistically only half of that energy at most would be re-emitted into space, what's the rest of it doing, except to warm the earth?
     
  3. westwall
    Online

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    41,018
    Thanks Received:
    7,987
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,786




    konrad,

    You can flog your dead horse all you want but the preponderance of real scientific evidence shows otherwise. The real science shows that the heat comes first and then the CO increase.
    You have an extremely limited vocabulary and the science you quote is wrong for the majority of what it claims.
     

Share This Page