A Labour government will immediately recognise the state of Palestine.

[fanger]

Labour is committed to a comprehensive peace in the Middle East based on a two-state solution – a secure Israel alongside a secure and viable state of Palestine. There can be no military solution to this conflict and all sides must avoid taking action that would make peace harder to achieve. That means both an end to the blockade, occupation and settlements, and an end to rocket and terror attacks. Labour will continue to press for an immediate return to meaningful negotiations leading to a diplomatic resolution. A Labour government will immediately recognise the state of Palestine.

Juan cole's blog

Gets my vote

 

[Hollie]

Labour is committed to a comprehensive peace in the Middle East based on a two-state solution – a secure Israel alongside a secure and viable state of Palestine. There can be no military solution to this conflict and all sides must avoid taking action that would make peace harder to achieve. That means both an end to the blockade, occupation and settlements, and an end to rocket and terror attacks. Labour will continue to press for an immediate return to meaningful negotiations leading to a diplomatic resolution. A Labour government will immediately recognise the state of Palestine.

Juan cole's blog

Gets my vote

The State of Hamas'istan or the state of Mahmoud'istan?

 

[fanger]

There is a clue in the last word of the thread title, would you like to phone a friend (if you had one)

 

[Hollie]

There is a clue in the last word of the thread title, would you like to phone a friend (if you had one)

Can I phone Bernie?

The Bernie Sanders Miracle: American Crowd in Brooklyn Cheers Palestinian Dignity

 

[fanger]

From your link
The Israeli propaganda line is that the Palestinians are natural, intrinsic terrorists who are always attacking Israelis out of blind hatred for Jews and who casually deploy terrorism on a mass scale and refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine.

Perhaps Sen. Sanders would not agree with what I am going to say. But this narrative ignores that in 1800 there were virtually no Jews in Palestine. It ignores that the Jewish settlers in British Mandate Palestine derailed British plans for a Palestinian state by 1949 (as put forward in the 1939 White Paper), in accordance with all the other Class A Mandates established at and after the Versailles Peace Conference that ended World War I. That is, the French Mandate of Syria became Syria and Syrians have Syrian citizenship, the British Mandate of Iraq became Iraq and Iraqis have Iraqi citizenship. Even Class B Mandates became independent countries and their inhabitants became citizens– Tanganyika became Tanzania and Zanzibar, Ruanda-Urundi became Rwanda and Burundi. Why did not the Mandate of Palestine result in a state of Palestine in which the Palestinians were citizens?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Labour is committed to a comprehensive peace in the Middle East based on a two-state solution – a secure Israel alongside a secure and viable state of Palestine. There can be no military solution to this conflict and all sides must avoid taking action that would make peace harder to achieve. That means both an end to the blockade, occupation and settlements, and an end to rocket and terror attacks. Labour will continue to press for an immediate return to meaningful negotiations leading to a diplomatic resolution. A Labour government will immediately recognise the state of Palestine.

Juan cole's blog

Gets my vote

There is no state to recognize.

 

[Hollie]

From your link
The Israeli propaganda line is that the Palestinians are natural, intrinsic terrorists who are always attacking Israelis out of blind hatred for Jews and who casually deploy terrorism on a mass scale and refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine.

Perhaps Sen. Sanders would not agree with what I am going to say. But this narrative ignores that in 1800 there were virtually no Jews in Palestine. It ignores that the Jewish settlers in British Mandate Palestine derailed British plans for a Palestinian state by 1949 (as put forward in the 1939 White Paper), in accordance with all the other Class A Mandates established at and after the Versailles Peace Conference that ended World War I. That is, the French Mandate of Syria became Syria and Syrians have Syrian citizenship, the British Mandate of Iraq became Iraq and Iraqis have Iraqi citizenship. Even Class B Mandates became independent countries and their inhabitants became citizens– Tanganyika became Tanzania and Zanzibar, Ruanda-Urundi became Rwanda and Burundi. Why did not the Mandate of Palestine result in a state of Palestine in which the Palestinians were citizens?

From your post:

OOPS

The Israeli Hasbara line is that the Palestinians are natural, intrinsic terrorists who are always attacking Israelis out of blind hatred for Jews and who casually deploy terrorism on a mass scale and refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine.



You never thanked (or attributed), Juan Cole for what you plagiarized from his site.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

From your link
The Israeli propaganda line is that the Palestinians are natural, intrinsic terrorists who are always attacking Israelis out of blind hatred for Jews and who casually deploy terrorism on a mass scale and refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine.

Perhaps Sen. Sanders would not agree with what I am going to say. But this narrative ignores that in 1800 there were virtually no Jews in Palestine. It ignores that the Jewish settlers in British Mandate Palestine derailed British plans for a Palestinian state by 1949 (as put forward in the 1939 White Paper), in accordance with all the other Class A Mandates established at and after the Versailles Peace Conference that ended World War I. That is, the French Mandate of Syria became Syria and Syrians have Syrian citizenship, the British Mandate of Iraq became Iraq and Iraqis have Iraqi citizenship. Even Class B Mandates became independent countries and their inhabitants became citizens– Tanganyika became Tanzania and Zanzibar, Ruanda-Urundi became Rwanda and Burundi. Why did not the Mandate of Palestine result in a state of Palestine in which the Palestinians were citizens?

Why did not the Mandate of Palestine result in a state of Palestine in which the Palestinians were citizens?

It did, in Jordan.
Of course even Jordan doesn't want the Arab assholes currently causing trouble in Israel.
Neither does anyone else.....

 

[fanger]

Further From Hollow Hollie's link
The simple-minded Zionist talking point that the British split their Mandate into Palestine and Jordan, and that Jordan is Palestine, is historically laughable and does not answer the question of why the Palestinians don’t have a state of their own and why over 5 million of them are stateless, lacking the rights of citizenship in any state. French Syria was also split into Syria and Lebanon, and everybody got citizenship; this is also true of Ruanda-Urundi, which was split.

Part of what Sen. Sanders likely means by Palestinian dignity is that you can’t have dignity as a human being in the modern world if you don’t have the right of citizenship in a state. Palestinians are deprived of that dignity. There are likely only about 12 million stateless people in the world, and Palestinians are the largest single such group. Not only do Palestinians not have a state and not only are they therefore left without the basic human rights that come with citizenship, they labor under Israeli military occupation

 

[Indeependent]

Funny how Labor decided to bomb the shit out of Gaza when Gaza lobbed a few missiles at Tel Aviv.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Further From Hollow Hollie's link
The simple-minded Zionist talking point that the British split their Mandate into Palestine and Jordan, and that Jordan is Palestine, is historically laughable and does not answer the question of why the Palestinians don’t have a state of their own and why over 5 million of them are stateless, lacking the rights of citizenship in any state. French Syria was also split into Syria and Lebanon, and everybody got citizenship; this is also true of Ruanda-Urundi, which was split.

Part of what Sen. Sanders likely means by Palestinian dignity is that you can’t have dignity as a human being in the modern world if you don’t have the right of citizenship in a state. Palestinians are deprived of that dignity. There are likely only about 12 million stateless people in the world, and Palestinians are the largest single such group. Not only do Palestinians not have a state and not only are they therefore left without the basic human rights that come with citizenship, they labor under Israeli military occupation

does not answer the question of why the Palestinians don’t have a state of their own

Because they suck.

that you can’t have dignity as a human being in the modern world if you don’t have the right of citizenship in a state.

They should move to Syria. Or maybe to Saudi Arabia.

 

[Hollie]

Further From Hollow Hollie's link
The simple-minded Zionist talking point that the British split their Mandate into Palestine and Jordan, and that Jordan is Palestine, is historically laughable and does not answer the question of why the Palestinians don’t have a state of their own and why over 5 million of them are stateless, lacking the rights of citizenship in any state. French Syria was also split into Syria and Lebanon, and everybody got citizenship; this is also true of Ruanda-Urundi, which was split.

Part of what Sen. Sanders likely means by Palestinian dignity is that you can’t have dignity as a human being in the modern world if you don’t have the right of citizenship in a state. Palestinians are deprived of that dignity. There are likely only about 12 million stateless people in the world, and Palestinians are the largest single such group. Not only do Palestinians not have a state and not only are they therefore left without the basic human rights that come with citizenship, they labor under Israeli military occupation

Further from the plagiarists link:

"The Israeli Hasbara line is that the Palestinians are natural, intrinsic terrorists who are always attacking Israelis out of blind hatred for Jews and who casually deploy terrorism on a mass scale and refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine."


Wow. That's.... what Juan Cole wrote. Oh, I see. Juan, that little scamp, stole what you wrote. Yeah, that must be it.

 

[fanger]

"refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine".
True

 

[Hollie]

"refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine".
True

Did you thank Juan Cole for copying material from his blog?

 

[Hollie]

"....that you can’t have dignity as a human being in the modern world if you don’t have the right of citizenship in a state."


But.... but....but wait. We're told by the Arab-islamic terrorist firster crowd that Pal'istan, (ruled by two separate and hostile Islamic terrorist franchises), is a "state", or something.

 

[fanger]

"refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine".
True

Did you thank Juan Cole for copying material from his blog?

No need, I copied what you plagiarized with a link to your post

 

[Hollie]

"refuse to recognize the inexorability and naturalness of several million European and North African and other Jews living in Palestine".
True

Did you thank Juan Cole for copying material from his blog?

No need, I copied what you plagiarized with a link to your post

Allah Akbar.... dude.

 

[fanger]

"....that you can’t have dignity as a human being in the modern world if you don’t have the right of citizenship in a state."


But.... but....but wait. We're told by the Arab-islamic terrorist firster crowd that Pal'istan, (ruled by two separate and hostile Islamic terrorist franchises), is a "state", or something.

Well it appears that jewish illegal immigrants can invade Palestine, take over by Terror and call it their own state for now

 

[Indeependent]

"....that you can’t have dignity as a human being in the modern world if you don’t have the right of citizenship in a state."


But.... but....but wait. We're told by the Arab-islamic terrorist firster crowd that Pal'istan, (ruled by two separate and hostile Islamic terrorist franchises), is a "state", or something.

Well it appears that jewish illegal immigrants can invade Palestine, take over by Terror and call it their own state for now

Just like Mohammed and the RCC?

 

[Hollie]

"....that you can’t have dignity as a human being in the modern world if you don’t have the right of citizenship in a state."


But.... but....but wait. We're told by the Arab-islamic terrorist firster crowd that Pal'istan, (ruled by two separate and hostile Islamic terrorist franchises), is a "state", or something.

Well it appears that jewish illegal immigrants can invade Palestine, take over by Terror and call it their own state for now

What illegal immigrants?

What invasion took place?

If you steal something from Juan Cole's blog as a response, it will be easy to identify. Your ability to assemble words into coherent sentences is quite limited.