A government that can take from the Rich

[Care4all]

And this would be when exactly? Was this way back when women were the property?

Women were never property. Can't even be honest with yourself can you?

So when is this "golden era" that you want to return to? Got a time frame?

you were right, women were nothing more than property when the usa was formed

When were US women no longer the property of their husbands

 

[Seawytch]

We had our greatest prosperity when all men and women were secure in their rights to their property.

And this would be when exactly? Was this way back when women were the property?

And when in your lifetime was this the case?

When in my lifetime was Avatar wanting to return to? I would like to know what "time" Avatar wants to return to when he/she believes that we were "secure in our property rights"? Was that in my lifetime?

 

[Full-Auto]

And this would be when exactly? Was this way back when women were the property?

And when in your lifetime was this the case?

When in my lifetime was Avatar wanting to return to? I would like to know what "time" Avatar wants to return to when he/she believes that we were "secure in our property rights"? Was that in my lifetime?

You have posted the perfect drama queen response.


The comment is obviously above your level of education and understanding.

You might want to put that quote in a search engine and realize just how full of shit you are.

 

[Seawytch]

And when in your lifetime was this the case?

When in my lifetime was Avatar wanting to return to? I would like to know what "time" Avatar wants to return to when he/she believes that we were "secure in our property rights"? Was that in my lifetime?

You have posted the perfect drama queen response.


The comment is obviously above your level of education and understanding.

You might want to put that quote in a search engine and realize just how full of shit you are.

Ah, so you don't know what "time" he/she was talking about either. Why don't you just say so?

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Obviously you don't know a thing about finance.

I guess you think everything they do is in as total vacuum. They don't have to pay any overhead for their offices, their employees, utilities, state and federal taxes, licenses, worker's compensation, etc.

You claim they have no risk. The fact that more and more people defaulted on loans from 2003 to 2009 than just about any time in our history. The folks that defaulted walked sticking the banks with the bill.

I used to loan money and I had a list of at least 50 names of people that never paid me back. The poor are not the helpless sucks you claim they are. The reason some of them are poor is because of waste and lack of accountability.

Again.

Rich people, do NOT use their own money. If a loan is defaulted on..that comes from the other investors..or if it's a bank..it's taken out in fees.

None of the people that engineered the collapse..had any skin in the game. They were ready to walk away. Look at Dick Fuld from Lehman. He presided over the collapse of an institution that was around for over a century. He walked out of the office with a 20 million dollar golden parachute while employees and investors got bupkis.

That's why President Bush..and the rest of the conservative cowboys had to cobble together TARP. Because the kings of wallstreet were all planning on doing the very same thing.

I'm sure they were all trying to rob us. All it takes is one or two highly publicized examples and you libs paint the entire industry with the same brush.

Yeah....right.....what possible dangers exist, when all you see are....

....tips of icebergs??!!!

Stupid Teabaggers​

 

[mudwhistle]

Mitt Romney has given more to charity than any other candidate in recent history and has done so consistantly throughout his life. How much did you give to the poor recently?

Not relevent, as even Jesus said the meager contribution by the poor was greater than the rich man giving what he could spare.

Mark 12:42 And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.
12:43 And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury:
12:44 For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living.

You say you want to pay our obligations yet you are going to vote against the one person who in public and private life has a record of paying obligations, eliminating waste, and making sure there was still profit at the end of it. That makes alot of sense.

He has a record of enriching himself at the expense of those who are barely scraping by. It's not only moral or right, it's self-destructive.

He did not need a fourth mansion, but those AmPad folks really could have used jobs.

You quote Jesus, yet you ignore His counsels. You live contrary to them and are proud of it.

Damn straight. I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy.

Some would call it the Mitt Romney Stimulus.

Wonder what all of those contractors would be doing if they weren't building homes, like his so-called mansions?

I guess collecting Unemployment.

I noticed the left has criminalized everything that doesn't involve government.

Romney hires a large group of employees to do a job, pays them a good wage and they take that money and use it to buy things, pay bills, pay taxes, and Mitt is an evil bastard.

Boggles the mind.

 

[mudwhistle]

Women were never property. Can't even be honest with yourself can you?

So when is this "golden era" that you want to return to? Got a time frame?

you were right, women were nothing more than property when the usa was formed

When were US women no longer the property of their husbands

I know, it was horrible.

Speaking of owning women, do you support a Muslim's right to own his wife?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Can take from the poor much easier.

When we allow politicians and bureaucrats divide us because of envy and covetousness, we weaken our own rights and potential.

The poor rich people, they just don't have a thing. Pretty soon, they are going to be forced to eat their polo ponies.

We had our greatest prosperity when the wealthy paid their fair share.

The top 10 percent of income earners constitute 70 percent of the Federal Income Tax. The bottom 50 percent of income earners pay less than 3 percent. How do you define "Fair Share"?

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Can take from the poor much easier.

When we allow politicians and bureaucrats divide us because of envy and covetousness, we weaken our own rights and potential.

The poor rich people, they just don't have a thing. Pretty soon, they are going to be forced to eat their polo ponies.

We had our greatest prosperity when the wealthy paid their fair share.

We had our greatest prosperity when all men and women were secure in their rights to their property.

Gee.....how (typically) vague, of you.

 

[Care4all]

So when is this "golden era" that you want to return to? Got a time frame?

you were right, women were nothing more than property when the usa was formed

When were US women no longer the property of their husbands

I know, it was horrible.

Speaking of owning women, do you support a Muslim's right to own his wife?

Of course not, why would I support such a thing? Why would you even ask the question Mud?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Can take from the poor much easier.

When we allow politicians and bureaucrats divide us because of envy and covetousness, we weaken our own rights and potential.

Sounds like something the Rich would say.

Or get their apologists to say for them...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Can take from the poor much easier.

When we allow politicians and bureaucrats divide us because of envy and covetousness, we weaken our own rights and potential.

Okay, so you take the power of taxation and regulation away from the Government.

Where does that leave us?

 

[Full-Auto]

When in my lifetime was Avatar wanting to return to? I would like to know what "time" Avatar wants to return to when he/she believes that we were "secure in our property rights"? Was that in my lifetime?

You have posted the perfect drama queen response.


The comment is obviously above your level of education and understanding.

You might want to put that quote in a search engine and realize just how full of shit you are.

Ah, so you don't know what "time" he/she was talking about either. Why don't you just say so?

I didnt need to read into it what you did.

I just had to think back at the last property rights ruling by the SC, just had to think back to Obama signing NDAA.

Is it that difficult for you to think?

 

[WillowTree]

Can take from the poor much easier.

When we allow politicians and bureaucrats divide us because of envy and covetousness, we weaken our own rights and potential.

Okay, so you take the power of taxation and regulation away from the Government.

Where does that leave us?

that's leaves you with something to do besides leech.

 

[Seawytch]

Can take from the poor much easier.

When we allow politicians and bureaucrats divide us because of envy and covetousness, we weaken our own rights and potential.

The poor rich people, they just don't have a thing. Pretty soon, they are going to be forced to eat their polo ponies.

We had our greatest prosperity when the wealthy paid their fair share.

The top 10 percent of income earners constitute 70 percent of the Federal Income Tax. The bottom 50 percent of income earners pay less than 3 percent. How do you define "Fair Share"?

I guarantee you that the bottom 50% would prefer to earn enough to pay taxes on.

"Fair Share" would be that the guy who makes $56,000 a day pays the same amount of taxes as the guy who makes $56,000 a year, but that isn't the case. Willard, who makes money off money, pays 15% while the guy who makes money off the sweat of his labor pays twice that.

The top 10 percent own all the wealth...

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Can take from the poor much easier.

When we allow politicians and bureaucrats divide us because of envy and covetousness, we weaken our own rights and potential.

You fucking moron. We don't want to "take care of the poor", we want to give them opportunity.

If Mitt Romney can pay a measly 15% on 56 thousand a DAY, then why do others have to pay 30% on 56 thousand a YEAR? What is wrong with these right wingers? They need more fish. I hear fish is good for the brain.

It doesnt matter whether your rich or poor, if your right to your property is not secure, none of our property rights are.

.....Especially those properties that Bain Capital (and, other such vultures) have "recovered", right??

 

[Full-Auto]

You fucking moron. We don't want to "take care of the poor", we want to give them opportunity.

If Mitt Romney can pay a measly 15% on 56 thousand a DAY, then why do others have to pay 30% on 56 thousand a YEAR? What is wrong with these right wingers? They need more fish. I hear fish is good for the brain.

It doesnt matter whether your rich or poor, if your right to your property is not secure, none of our property rights are.

.....Especially those properties that Bain Capital (and, other such vultures) have "recovered", right??

Piss poor example, but it is all you can muster.

 

[Care4all]

the working poor and the working middle class just needs to get paid more for the work and profits they make for their employers or stock holders, so it is not just in the hands of the few at the very top..... that would solve this problem without needing government to tax someone more....imho

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Ummm, no, not really.

We had our greatest prosperity when we had a fair distribution of the rewards of labor.

You realize that it doesn't matter what you earn if everything you earn can be taken away from you, right?

Our forefathers fight and died to secure our right to keep our property from an over intrusive government. And you want to hand it to them because you are jealous of others. How screwed up is that?

You Jesus-freaks really do need to start reading more than (just) one Book.​

"I hope we shall... crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country."

- THOMAS JEFFERSON​

​

$

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Can take from the poor much easier.

When we allow politicians and bureaucrats divide us because of envy and covetousness, we weaken our own rights and potential.

You fucking moron. We don't want to "take care of the poor", we want to give them opportunity.

If Mitt Romney can pay a measly 15% on 56 thousand a DAY, then why do others have to pay 30% on 56 thousand a YEAR? What is wrong with these right wingers? They need more fish. I hear fish is good for the brain.

Oh and the rest of us don't pay that much.

People like you, and Katy Abram, really should consult your "money-managers", regarding such issues.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_09xPF_9UjM]"Hardball": Katy Abram Told Medicare Is "Successful Socialism" - YouTube[/ame]​