A Flying Car; Really!

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by American Horse, Jun 29, 2010.

  1. American Horse
    Offline

    American Horse AKA "Mustang"

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,741
    Thanks Received:
    892
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    The Hoosier Heartland
    Ratings:
    +938

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jun 30, 2010
  2. Ringel05
    Online

    Ringel05 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    40,304
    Thanks Received:
    8,017
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    El Paso, TX
    Ratings:
    +17,435
    That actually pretty cool!
     
  3. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    There was a TV show in the 50's or 60's about a guy with a flying car (no it wasn't his mother). It was one of my faves. I'm sure the technology has improved but the concept has been around for decades.
     
  4. American Horse
    Offline

    American Horse AKA "Mustang"

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,741
    Thanks Received:
    892
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    The Hoosier Heartland
    Ratings:
    +938
    It looks dangerous as hell! The prop in back where it really had to be with the canard in front would seem to make it highly problematic to control, It probably needs a computer assist. If it lost power, might gliding control suffer?

    I wouldn't want to get in one of these things unless it had a parachute to bring it down safely.

    Back in the early years of flight (or at least back in the 50's) it was theorized that by gong 3-dimensional there would be a whole lot more room in the air than on highways so it would be safer.

    But now we know it ends up not working out that way since airplanes tend to need airports to land on and take off from, so they concentrate over them and we have too many near misses. And that's reality even though we now have planes carrying many hundreds of passengers instead of maybe two or three at a time.
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2010
  5. Ringel05
    Online

    Ringel05 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    40,304
    Thanks Received:
    8,017
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    El Paso, TX
    Ratings:
    +17,435
    Yup, there is always a downside. Driving is dangerous and vehicles are mostly concentrated on roads. Calculate the near misses every day on the highways alone.
    The car is still pretty cool, ugly as sin but still cool.
     
  6. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    Probably safe in a glide...It's nearly impossible to stall canard designs.
     
  7. American Horse
    Offline

    American Horse AKA "Mustang"

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,741
    Thanks Received:
    892
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    The Hoosier Heartland
    Ratings:
    +938
    I'm not so sure about that last. The first designs were very dangerous until some computer aid was built in. And when they run out of gas... well...(Remember John Denver)
     
  8. American Horse
    Offline

    American Horse AKA "Mustang"

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,741
    Thanks Received:
    892
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    The Hoosier Heartland
    Ratings:
    +938
    Now there you have something; we drive cars down state roads and the combined speed is something like 150 mph, and we often times pass only about 4' feet apart; that's a near miss, but a controlled near miss. And we do it in heavy rain and at night when all we can see is the light from their headlights and a bare nebulous image of the road for reference.
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2010
  9. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    The first designs were "dangerous" because a canard layout wasn't the norm....They have differing handling characteristics, as do tricycle vs. taildragger configurations.

    Computer aids and fly-by-wire in canard designs are more for weight savings and relative ease of operation, more so than any inherent stability problems.
     
  10. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,683
    The Wright Flyer was a canard and that worked out just fine didn't it?

    But let's be reality here. Would you want typical L.A. or New York drivers flying around? Or the drunk illegal aliens?
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2010

Share This Page