A Brief Presentation of White Privilege

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

#1) Reason more are stopped. Statistically they commit more crime so they are going to be stopped more frequently. I am going to have my wife's car serviced more frequently than my own because she drives more.

The behavior you are describing is explicitly prejudicial in the context of a traffic stop. It would be like if I argued for a stop and frisk program in NYC that targeted white men in suits in Manhattan on the basis that people belonging to that demographic commit more financial crimes than people belonging to other demographics. Or even more broadly, what if the police decided to randomly stop men they see driving since men commit the majority of violent crimes? After being stopped a few times, I imagine you would recognize the injustice of this argument. A traffic stop ought to be predicated on an observation of a traffic violation or some other minimal probable cause, and that's the point: black people are targeted on the basis of prejudicial arguments like the one you just made while others are not.

And it's not just traffic stops, there are also problematic racial disparities in the use of force, in the rates at which unarmed black men are shot by the police, as well as in other aspects of the criminal justice system, from bail decisions to plea-bargaining, jury selection, and sentencing (cf. Race and Crime vol. 4, 2016, I can cite specific passages if you like, referencing a variety of research over the last 20 years, or a good introduction to some common issues is the DOJ report on Ferguson).

#2) White folks aren't the ones with drugs in their car. LOL. Whites get arrested for meth very frequently and that holds the same penalty as blacks with crack.

Whites use and sell drugs at similar (or higher) rates than blacks, but blacks are more often arrested for drug use. Up until very recently there were also racial disparities in sentencing for drug related crimes.

#3) NW. Easy. Historical wealth builds on itself. Grandparents pass to parents pass to kids and so on. If I get a free house or a house at a discount I get a leg up. I am a 2nd generation American so I didn't have that advantage. Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth.

#4) Assets. I have no idea where he gets this data from but he is incorrect unless he is saying that black families are poor savers or excessive spenders.

Basically, you said it all when you said "Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth," you just don't seem to realize what was actually involved in that colonization, and not just 300 years ago but in the 20th century.

My family came as Catholic immigrants from Poland in the 20th Century, now my family is worth about 1.8 million in assets, and made about 240 K last year.

The fact is a lot of Whites, and also Asians who came rather recently are not just doing better than Blacks, and Hispanics, but even White colonist Protestants down South too.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

#1) Reason more are stopped. Statistically they commit more crime so they are going to be stopped more frequently. I am going to have my wife's car serviced more frequently than my own because she drives more.

The behavior you are describing is explicitly prejudicial in the context of a traffic stop. It would be like if I argued for a stop and frisk program in NYC that targeted white men in suits in Manhattan on the basis that people belonging to that demographic commit more financial crimes than people belonging to other demographics. Or even more broadly, what if the police decided to randomly stop men they see driving since men commit the majority of violent crimes? After being stopped a few times, I imagine you would recognize the injustice of this argument. A traffic stop ought to be predicated on an observation of a traffic violation or some other minimal probable cause, and that's the point: black people are targeted on the basis of prejudicial arguments like the one you just made while others are not.

And it's not just traffic stops, there are also problematic racial disparities in the use of force, in the rates at which unarmed black men are shot by the police, as well as in other aspects of the criminal justice system, from bail decisions to plea-bargaining, jury selection, and sentencing (cf. Race and Crime vol. 4, 2016, I can cite specific passages if you like, referencing a variety of research over the last 20 years, or a good introduction to some common issues is the DOJ report on Ferguson).

#2) White folks aren't the ones with drugs in their car. LOL. Whites get arrested for meth very frequently and that holds the same penalty as blacks with crack.

Whites use and sell drugs at similar (or higher) rates than blacks, but blacks are more often arrested for drug use. Up until very recently there were also racial disparities in sentencing for drug related crimes.

#3) NW. Easy. Historical wealth builds on itself. Grandparents pass to parents pass to kids and so on. If I get a free house or a house at a discount I get a leg up. I am a 2nd generation American so I didn't have that advantage. Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth.

#4) Assets. I have no idea where he gets this data from but he is incorrect unless he is saying that black families are poor savers or excessive spenders.

The discussion about wealth and economic inequality between blacks and whites is really crucial to understanding some of the disparities in the criminal justice system, but the problem with your analysis is that you take it for granted that those disparities are the result of some neutral or otherwise innocent historical processes. But that's completely false, and also of course ignores that there are plenty of black folks in the US whose families have been here longer than many whites have.

But the bigger problem is that the wide disparities in income and wealth were explicitly created by racist policies over hundreds of years, many of which only ended within the last couple decades, while other (usually less overtly racist) policies continue. On this, I recommend the book The Color of Law. Discrimination in employment and education; Redlining, contract selling, block-busting, and other discriminatory housing practices (including explicitly racist federal loan policies, again cf. The Color of Law) by which the creation of concentrated poverty in segregated areas was accomplished; policies of mass incarceration; the previously mentioned disparities in law enforcement; all of these have contributed to the present levels of economic inequality which people like you use to justify their racial prejudices. But the game was always rigged, and you can't systematically steal the wealth of a people for hundreds of years and then reasonably expect those wounds to heal by themselves.

Basically, you said it all when you said "Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth," you just don't seem to realize what was actually involved in that colonization, and not just 300 years ago but in the 20th century.

This is insanity. Frisking those in suits because of white collar crime doesn't make any sense but putting more SEC agents to peruse and review the practices of such people is fine and DOES HAPPEN!!!

Racist policies? Then why do Asians and Jews earn more? Why do Hindus earn the same?

Are you arguing for white privlege or black disadvantage? Pick one.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

#1) Reason more are stopped. Statistically they commit more crime so they are going to be stopped more frequently. I am going to have my wife's car serviced more frequently than my own because she drives more.

The behavior you are describing is explicitly prejudicial in the context of a traffic stop. It would be like if I argued for a stop and frisk program in NYC that targeted white men in suits in Manhattan on the basis that people belonging to that demographic commit more financial crimes than people belonging to other demographics. Or even more broadly, what if the police decided to randomly stop men they see driving since men commit the majority of violent crimes? After being stopped a few times, I imagine you would recognize the injustice of this argument. A traffic stop ought to be predicated on an observation of a traffic violation or some other minimal probable cause, and that's the point: black people are targeted on the basis of prejudicial arguments like the one you just made while others are not.

And it's not just traffic stops, there are also problematic racial disparities in the use of force, in the rates at which unarmed black men are shot by the police, as well as in other aspects of the criminal justice system, from bail decisions to plea-bargaining, jury selection, and sentencing (cf. Race and Crime vol. 4, 2016, I can cite specific passages if you like, referencing a variety of research over the last 20 years, or a good introduction to some common issues is the DOJ report on Ferguson).

#2) White folks aren't the ones with drugs in their car. LOL. Whites get arrested for meth very frequently and that holds the same penalty as blacks with crack.

Whites use and sell drugs at similar (or higher) rates than blacks, but blacks are more often arrested for drug use. Up until very recently there were also racial disparities in sentencing for drug related crimes.

#3) NW. Easy. Historical wealth builds on itself. Grandparents pass to parents pass to kids and so on. If I get a free house or a house at a discount I get a leg up. I am a 2nd generation American so I didn't have that advantage. Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth.

#4) Assets. I have no idea where he gets this data from but he is incorrect unless he is saying that black families are poor savers or excessive spenders.

The discussion about wealth and economic inequality between blacks and whites is really crucial to understanding some of the disparities in the criminal justice system, but the problem with your analysis is that you take it for granted that those disparities are the result of some neutral or otherwise innocent historical processes. But that's completely false, and also of course ignores that there are plenty of black folks in the US whose families have been here longer than many whites have.

But the bigger problem is that the wide disparities in income and wealth were explicitly created by racist policies over hundreds of years, many of which only ended within the last couple decades, while other (usually less overtly racist) policies continue. On this, I recommend the book The Color of Law. Discrimination in employment and education; Redlining, contract selling, block-busting, and other discriminatory housing practices (including explicitly racist federal loan policies, again cf. The Color of Law) by which the creation of concentrated poverty in segregated areas was accomplished; policies of mass incarceration; the previously mentioned disparities in law enforcement; all of these have contributed to the present levels of economic inequality which people like you use to justify their racial prejudices. But the game was always rigged, and you can't systematically steal the wealth of a people for hundreds of years and then reasonably expect those wounds to heal by themselves.

Basically, you said it all when you said "Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth," you just don't seem to realize what was actually involved in that colonization, and not just 300 years ago but in the 20th century.

This is insanity. Frisking those in suits because of white collar crime doesn't make any sense but putting more SEC agents to peruse and review the practices of such people is fine and DOES HAPPEN!!!

Racist policies? Then why do Asians and Jews earn more? Why do Hindus earn the same?

Are you arguing for white privlege or black disadvantage? Pick one.

Hindus are dark skinned, and a religious minority, and they are the #1 earners in America.

That shouldn't be happening in such a racist, and White privilege country.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

#1) Reason more are stopped. Statistically they commit more crime so they are going to be stopped more frequently. I am going to have my wife's car serviced more frequently than my own because she drives more.

The behavior you are describing is explicitly prejudicial in the context of a traffic stop. It would be like if I argued for a stop and frisk program in NYC that targeted white men in suits in Manhattan on the basis that people belonging to that demographic commit more financial crimes than people belonging to other demographics. Or even more broadly, what if the police decided to randomly stop men they see driving since men commit the majority of violent crimes? After being stopped a few times, I imagine you would recognize the injustice of this argument. A traffic stop ought to be predicated on an observation of a traffic violation or some other minimal probable cause, and that's the point: black people are targeted on the basis of prejudicial arguments like the one you just made while others are not.

And it's not just traffic stops, there are also problematic racial disparities in the use of force, in the rates at which unarmed black men are shot by the police, as well as in other aspects of the criminal justice system, from bail decisions to plea-bargaining, jury selection, and sentencing (cf. Race and Crime vol. 4, 2016, I can cite specific passages if you like, referencing a variety of research over the last 20 years, or a good introduction to some common issues is the DOJ report on Ferguson).

#2) White folks aren't the ones with drugs in their car. LOL. Whites get arrested for meth very frequently and that holds the same penalty as blacks with crack.

Whites use and sell drugs at similar (or higher) rates than blacks, but blacks are more often arrested for drug use. Up until very recently there were also racial disparities in sentencing for drug related crimes.

#3) NW. Easy. Historical wealth builds on itself. Grandparents pass to parents pass to kids and so on. If I get a free house or a house at a discount I get a leg up. I am a 2nd generation American so I didn't have that advantage. Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth.

#4) Assets. I have no idea where he gets this data from but he is incorrect unless he is saying that black families are poor savers or excessive spenders.

Basically, you said it all when you said "Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth," you just don't seem to realize what was actually involved in that colonization, and not just 300 years ago but in the 20th century.

My family came as Catholic immigrants from Poland in the 20th Century, now my family is worth about 1.8 million in assets, and made about 240 K last year.

The fact is a lot of Whites, and also Asians who came rather recently are not just doing better than Blacks, and Hispanics, but even White colonist Protestants down South too.

Yet you hate America? How is that?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

#1) Reason more are stopped. Statistically they commit more crime so they are going to be stopped more frequently. I am going to have my wife's car serviced more frequently than my own because she drives more.

The behavior you are describing is explicitly prejudicial in the context of a traffic stop. It would be like if I argued for a stop and frisk program in NYC that targeted white men in suits in Manhattan on the basis that people belonging to that demographic commit more financial crimes than people belonging to other demographics. Or even more broadly, what if the police decided to randomly stop men they see driving since men commit the majority of violent crimes? After being stopped a few times, I imagine you would recognize the injustice of this argument. A traffic stop ought to be predicated on an observation of a traffic violation or some other minimal probable cause, and that's the point: black people are targeted on the basis of prejudicial arguments like the one you just made while others are not.

And it's not just traffic stops, there are also problematic racial disparities in the use of force, in the rates at which unarmed black men are shot by the police, as well as in other aspects of the criminal justice system, from bail decisions to plea-bargaining, jury selection, and sentencing (cf. Race and Crime vol. 4, 2016, I can cite specific passages if you like, referencing a variety of research over the last 20 years, or a good introduction to some common issues is the DOJ report on Ferguson).

#2) White folks aren't the ones with drugs in their car. LOL. Whites get arrested for meth very frequently and that holds the same penalty as blacks with crack.

Whites use and sell drugs at similar (or higher) rates than blacks, but blacks are more often arrested for drug use. Up until very recently there were also racial disparities in sentencing for drug related crimes.

#3) NW. Easy. Historical wealth builds on itself. Grandparents pass to parents pass to kids and so on. If I get a free house or a house at a discount I get a leg up. I am a 2nd generation American so I didn't have that advantage. Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth.

#4) Assets. I have no idea where he gets this data from but he is incorrect unless he is saying that black families are poor savers or excessive spenders.

Basically, you said it all when you said "Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth," you just don't seem to realize what was actually involved in that colonization, and not just 300 years ago but in the 20th century.

My family came as Catholic immigrants from Poland in the 20th Century, now my family is worth about 1.8 million in assets, and made about 240 K last year.

The fact is a lot of Whites, and also Asians who came rather recently are not just doing better than Blacks, and Hispanics, but even White colonist Protestants down South too.

Yet you hate America? How is that?

I'd rather have less money, and have my full Polish heritage back, thank you very much.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

#1) Reason more are stopped. Statistically they commit more crime so they are going to be stopped more frequently. I am going to have my wife's car serviced more frequently than my own because she drives more.

The behavior you are describing is explicitly prejudicial in the context of a traffic stop. It would be like if I argued for a stop and frisk program in NYC that targeted white men in suits in Manhattan on the basis that people belonging to that demographic commit more financial crimes than people belonging to other demographics. Or even more broadly, what if the police decided to randomly stop men they see driving since men commit the majority of violent crimes? After being stopped a few times, I imagine you would recognize the injustice of this argument. A traffic stop ought to be predicated on an observation of a traffic violation or some other minimal probable cause, and that's the point: black people are targeted on the basis of prejudicial arguments like the one you just made while others are not.

And it's not just traffic stops, there are also problematic racial disparities in the use of force, in the rates at which unarmed black men are shot by the police, as well as in other aspects of the criminal justice system, from bail decisions to plea-bargaining, jury selection, and sentencing (cf. Race and Crime vol. 4, 2016, I can cite specific passages if you like, referencing a variety of research over the last 20 years, or a good introduction to some common issues is the DOJ report on Ferguson).

#2) White folks aren't the ones with drugs in their car. LOL. Whites get arrested for meth very frequently and that holds the same penalty as blacks with crack.

Whites use and sell drugs at similar (or higher) rates than blacks, but blacks are more often arrested for drug use. Up until very recently there were also racial disparities in sentencing for drug related crimes.

#3) NW. Easy. Historical wealth builds on itself. Grandparents pass to parents pass to kids and so on. If I get a free house or a house at a discount I get a leg up. I am a 2nd generation American so I didn't have that advantage. Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth.

#4) Assets. I have no idea where he gets this data from but he is incorrect unless he is saying that black families are poor savers or excessive spenders.

Basically, you said it all when you said "Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth," you just don't seem to realize what was actually involved in that colonization, and not just 300 years ago but in the 20th century.

My family came as Catholic immigrants from Poland in the 20th Century, now my family is worth about 1.8 million in assets, and made about 240 K last year.

The fact is a lot of Whites, and also Asians who came rather recently are not just doing better than Blacks, and Hispanics, but even White colonist Protestants down South too.

Yet you hate America? How is that?

I'd rather have less money, and have my full Polish heritage back, thank you very much.

Then move to Poland. All that $$ you have, a plane ticket is cheap.

 

[Wyatt earp]

A snippet from one of Brother Time Wise's many lectures covering the topic of white privilege



This brother get's it.

Again, before you post, please cite what, exactly, is he stating that's wrong, false, misleading or otherwise deceptive.

Thanks.

Translation ~ whites are respectful and knows how to stay out of trouble. Blacks are obnoxious, dumb and cut their own throats .

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

#1) Reason more are stopped. Statistically they commit more crime so they are going to be stopped more frequently. I am going to have my wife's car serviced more frequently than my own because she drives more.

The behavior you are describing is explicitly prejudicial in the context of a traffic stop. It would be like if I argued for a stop and frisk program in NYC that targeted white men in suits in Manhattan on the basis that people belonging to that demographic commit more financial crimes than people belonging to other demographics. Or even more broadly, what if the police decided to randomly stop men they see driving since men commit the majority of violent crimes? After being stopped a few times, I imagine you would recognize the injustice of this argument. A traffic stop ought to be predicated on an observation of a traffic violation or some other minimal probable cause, and that's the point: black people are targeted on the basis of prejudicial arguments like the one you just made while others are not.

And it's not just traffic stops, there are also problematic racial disparities in the use of force, in the rates at which unarmed black men are shot by the police, as well as in other aspects of the criminal justice system, from bail decisions to plea-bargaining, jury selection, and sentencing (cf. Race and Crime vol. 4, 2016, I can cite specific passages if you like, referencing a variety of research over the last 20 years, or a good introduction to some common issues is the DOJ report on Ferguson).

#2) White folks aren't the ones with drugs in their car. LOL. Whites get arrested for meth very frequently and that holds the same penalty as blacks with crack.

Whites use and sell drugs at similar (or higher) rates than blacks, but blacks are more often arrested for drug use. Up until very recently there were also racial disparities in sentencing for drug related crimes.

#3) NW. Easy. Historical wealth builds on itself. Grandparents pass to parents pass to kids and so on. If I get a free house or a house at a discount I get a leg up. I am a 2nd generation American so I didn't have that advantage. Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth.

#4) Assets. I have no idea where he gets this data from but he is incorrect unless he is saying that black families are poor savers or excessive spenders.

Basically, you said it all when you said "Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth," you just don't seem to realize what was actually involved in that colonization, and not just 300 years ago but in the 20th century.

My family came as Catholic immigrants from Poland in the 20th Century, now my family is worth about 1.8 million in assets, and made about 240 K last year.

The fact is a lot of Whites, and also Asians who came rather recently are not just doing better than Blacks, and Hispanics, but even White colonist Protestants down South too.

Yet you hate America? How is that?

I'd rather have less money, and have my full Polish heritage back, thank you very much.

Then move to Poland. All that $$ you have, a plane ticket is cheap.

Unfortunately I'll always be a "Ethnic outsider"
Too Polish for America, too American for Poland.

This is the problem, America does strip away people of their heritages.

It does support assimilation, in favor of Capitalist junk culture like Walmart, Home Depot, McDonald's etc.

 

[Defiant1]

A snippet from one of Brother Time Wise's many lectures covering the topic of white privilege



This brother get's it.

Again, before you post, please cite what, exactly, is he stating that's wrong, false, misleading or otherwise deceptive.

Thanks.

I don't have a fancy car and I'm not law enforcement.
What does this have to do with me?

 

[BookShaka]

I understand white privilege to exist in tandem with whites making up the majority of the population. The closer the ratio of whites to POC gets the less privilege for whites. Flip through television channels forty years ago and how many POC would you see compared to white people? When I was young I had tons of barbie dolls and only one of them was black. That may be bc my parents bought me dolls that looked like me but then why buy a black doll at all? I played with her the same as the others. Nowadays our culture more reflects the population and there are more POC than before, but it’s a slow process. There are more white men at the “top” than black men but slowly POC are coming in and taking places that only whites filled before. Add to this the era of Jim Crow ended only 50 years ago...

To me privilege has very little to do with wealth and success and much to do with culture reflecting the population. It is something that’s hard to see when you benefit from it. I used to take offense to the idea of white privilege too, and though it’s sometimes used as an insult it shouldn’t be. From my POV it’s just the nature of things.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

#1) Reason more are stopped. Statistically they commit more crime so they are going to be stopped more frequently. I am going to have my wife's car serviced more frequently than my own because she drives more.

The behavior you are describing is explicitly prejudicial in the context of a traffic stop. It would be like if I argued for a stop and frisk program in NYC that targeted white men in suits in Manhattan on the basis that people belonging to that demographic commit more financial crimes than people belonging to other demographics. Or even more broadly, what if the police decided to randomly stop men they see driving since men commit the majority of violent crimes? After being stopped a few times, I imagine you would recognize the injustice of this argument. A traffic stop ought to be predicated on an observation of a traffic violation or some other minimal probable cause, and that's the point: black people are targeted on the basis of prejudicial arguments like the one you just made while others are not.

And it's not just traffic stops, there are also problematic racial disparities in the use of force, in the rates at which unarmed black men are shot by the police, as well as in other aspects of the criminal justice system, from bail decisions to plea-bargaining, jury selection, and sentencing (cf. Race and Crime vol. 4, 2016, I can cite specific passages if you like, referencing a variety of research over the last 20 years, or a good introduction to some common issues is the DOJ report on Ferguson).

#2) White folks aren't the ones with drugs in their car. LOL. Whites get arrested for meth very frequently and that holds the same penalty as blacks with crack.

Whites use and sell drugs at similar (or higher) rates than blacks, but blacks are more often arrested for drug use. Up until very recently there were also racial disparities in sentencing for drug related crimes.

#3) NW. Easy. Historical wealth builds on itself. Grandparents pass to parents pass to kids and so on. If I get a free house or a house at a discount I get a leg up. I am a 2nd generation American so I didn't have that advantage. Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth.

#4) Assets. I have no idea where he gets this data from but he is incorrect unless he is saying that black families are poor savers or excessive spenders.

Basically, you said it all when you said "Whites originally colonized the US so of course they have more generational wealth," you just don't seem to realize what was actually involved in that colonization, and not just 300 years ago but in the 20th century.

My family came as Catholic immigrants from Poland in the 20th Century, now my family is worth about 1.8 million in assets, and made about 240 K last year.

The fact is a lot of Whites, and also Asians who came rather recently are not just doing better than Blacks, and Hispanics, but even White colonist Protestants down South too.

Yet you hate America? How is that?

I'd rather have less money, and have my full Polish heritage back, thank you very much.

Then move to Poland. All that $$ you have, a plane ticket is cheap.

Your Jews have your Synagogue to meet local Jews.
Poles don't have exactly the same thing, we are a lot more culturally isolated than you guys, as Catholic goys, we tend to go to "Mixed" Catholic churches.

Only in a few very Polish neighborhoods in Greenpoint, or Chicago, you'll find very Polish culture.
HOWEVER, these Polish neighborhoods are dying, in Greenpoint the gentrification is kicking them out due to expenses, and in Chicago well it's Chicago it's dangerous, and expensive.

 

[BookShaka]

In the early days of my working carrer I was a victim of political prejudice. I was a young white male. I had three strikes against me because of affirmative action and bias against youth. Large companies were looking for women and minorities to fill their open positions. White and male was basically outlawed because of affirmative action quotas. Being young on top of that meant I had a harder time finding anyone willing to take a chance on me.

But you don't see me starting crazy race threads years later.

Affirmative action is a privilege. What led to its implementation may not have been ideal but it’s still a privilege. I’ve seen affirmative action used as an example of white privilege and I just LOLOLOL.

 

[Unkotare]

A snippet from one of Brother Time Wise's many lectures covering the topic of white privilege



This brother get's it.

Again, before you post, please cite what, exactly, is he stating that's wrong, false, misleading or otherwise deceptive.

Thanks.

Do you have any other obsessions, or is this it?

 

[well named]

There you go again...Parsing all the ethnic crap, instead of recognizing that the police state is a detriment to the liberties of everyone.....This recrimination and counter-recriminaton shit is just one big distraction from the ultimate underlying truth.

This doesn't really make sense. I agree that having a police state is detrimental to everyone, but it doesn't follow therefore that the negative effects are felt by all equally.

 

[MarcATL]

Translation ~ whites are respectful and knows how to stay out of trouble. Blacks are obnoxious, dumb and cut their own throats .

You want to refute something the brother said in his presentation? If so, I'm all ears.

 

[ptbw forever]

A snippet from one of Brother Time Wise's many lectures covering the topic of white privilege



This brother get's it.

Again, before you post, please cite what, exactly, is he stating that's wrong, false, misleading or otherwise deceptive.

Thanks.

Considering the fact that the idiot who posted that video is a racist piece of shit, that tells you all you need to know about Tim "Wise".

White privilege is a disgusting lie designed to completely disenfranchise and self-neuter a global minority to create the environment for a reverse manifest destiny and steal Europe from its indigenous population.

 

[ptbw forever]

There is no such thing as white privilege. It’s a phony, discriminatory concept that far left loons like you subscribe to in order to justify your own mediocrity and failures of your rotting subculture

Coming from our resident racist MOD, this response is laughable at best.

Says the idiot who posted a video entitled: "Whites are sociopaths"......

 

[Oddball]

This doesn't really make sense. I agree that having a police state is detrimental to everyone, but it doesn't follow therefore that the negative effects are felt by all equally.

As though matters of degree negate the underlying fact?!?

Just suppose that the impossible happens and The State runs out of blacks and hispanics to roust....You think that they'll just stop?

 

[captkaos]

So, instead of railing against horrible State policy because it's horrible and ineffective -then propose abolishing it because its detrimental to the liberties of everyone- piss and moan about it on the basis of ethnocentric complaints.

Instead of appealing to the sense of how The State is a threat to and oppresses everyone, peddle guilt and sow division by bellyaching about how its iron fist hits some more directly than others.

Appeal to emotion / appeal to reason.

As though there wasn't already enough evidence of what truly shitty salesmen that leftists are.

You would think the "Free shit" agenda of the Left would garner a bigger following. The Problem is anyone with a brain even a "brain on drugs" knows it's a scam. I have some beautiful Land for free. Actually means I have some land I got for free, and You can come work on it and we'll give you a place to live and take care of all your needs, and when you're to old to work anymore we'll make sure you get the best care available to you (which is none). But it's all free. all of your effort and work will be used to support the greater good. Sounds like Communism to me!!!!

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

A snippet from one of Brother Time Wise's many lectures covering the topic of white privilege



This brother get's it.

Again, before you post, please cite what, exactly, is he stating that's wrong, false, misleading or otherwise deceptive.

Thanks.

Considering the fact that the idiot who posted that video is a racist piece of shit, that tells you all you need to know about Tim "Wise".

White privilege is a disgusting lie designed to completely disenfranchise and self-neuter a global minority to create the environment for a reverse manifest destiny and steal Europe from its indigenous population.

Tim Wise apparently identifies as Jewish.

I made a thread that supports there might be more of a Jewish privilege.

Is it Jewish privilege, or White privilege?