99% of school kids handcuffed by NYC police black/Latino

you've. attempted to assign several thousand unsolved homicides of black persons, which occured nationwide BTW ,
to black perps. That's a big assumption on your part. The truth is we don't know who killed those people. And your assertion that
Blacks "commited " 51% of all U.S. homicides in 2015, based on the arrest data from table 43 underlines your limited cognitive ability.
Table 3 accurately puts the known Black offender homicide rate at 36.7% of the 15, 000+ homicides for that year.

Finally...i could probably be more receptive to the notion of assigning all or most of the unknown perps of black homicides to blacks if only urban areas were involved. However, when considering those homicides from a national perspective, the spread makes other possibilities far more plausible.

Polls use sample sizes much smaller than 3/4th all the time.

So, how is it not accurate?

Of course it is, we can conclude that about 51% of murderers were Black out of over 15,000.
What do polls have to do with unsolved homicides? Who are you polling, the dead bodies? That 51% of arrests. vs. 36% known black offenders for homicides means that
simply means 15% of black suspects were not verifiabe killers. Accordingly, they are innocent until proven guilty. That's one of the most sacred principles of the American justice system.

Yet, statistically curmudgeons with nefarious agendas project the race of dead bodies onto unknown killers who could, in reality, be of any. race.

The data really does support that about 51% of murderers are Black, and a number not much lower are Black murder victims.

The sample size is most certainly big enough to conclude the whole demographic.
Wow! You are confused! Table 43A clearly is labeled "arrests." And yes 51% of those arrested for murder were black. However Table 3 (labeled offenders) indicates that known Black offenders commited 36.7% -\of the murders occuring in 2015.

BTW... How do you recocile the fact that the number of arrestees in table 43A is lower than actual known offenders?
 
you've. attempted to assign several thousand unsolved homicides of black persons, which occured nationwide BTW ,
to black perps. That's a big assumption on your part. The truth is we don't know who killed those people. And your assertion that
Blacks "commited " 51% of all U.S. homicides in 2015, based on the arrest data from table 43 underlines your limited cognitive ability.
Table 3 accurately puts the known Black offender homicide rate at 36.7% of the 15, 000+ homicides for that year.

Finally...i could probably be more receptive to the notion of assigning all or most of the unknown perps of black homicides to blacks if only urban areas were involved. However, when considering those homicides from a national perspective, the spread makes other possibilities far more plausible.

Polls use sample sizes much smaller than 3/4th all the time.

So, how is it not accurate?

Of course it is, we can conclude that about 51% of murderers were Black out of over 15,000.
What do polls have to do with unsolved homicides? Who are you polling, the dead bodies? That 51% of arrests. vs. 36% known black offenders for homicides means that
simply means 15% of black suspects were not verifiabe killers. Accordingly, they are innocent until proven guilty. That's one of the most sacred principles of the American justice system.

Yet, statistically curmudgeons with nefarious agendas project the race of dead bodies onto unknown killers who could, in reality, be of any. race.

The data really does support that about 51% of murderers are Black, and a number not much lower are Black murder victims.

The sample size is most certainly big enough to conclude the whole demographic.
Wow! You are confused! Table 43A clearly is labeled "arrests." And yes 51% of those arrested for murder were black. However Table 3 (labeled offenders) indicates that known Black offenders commited 36.7% -\of the murders occuring in 2015.

BTW... How do you recocile the fact that the number of arrestees in table 43A is lower than actual known offenders?
Another HIDDEN FIGURE: 36.7% of 15,000 is 5,505 which means over 9500 of U.S. homicides occurring in 2015 were either unknown or committed by Whites and others.
 
you've. attempted to assign several thousand unsolved homicides of black persons, which occured nationwide BTW ,
to black perps. That's a big assumption on your part. The truth is we don't know who killed those people. And your assertion that
Blacks "commited " 51% of all U.S. homicides in 2015, based on the arrest data from table 43 underlines your limited cognitive ability.
Table 3 accurately puts the known Black offender homicide rate at 36.7% of the 15, 000+ homicides for that year.

Finally...i could probably be more receptive to the notion of assigning all or most of the unknown perps of black homicides to blacks if only urban areas were involved. However, when considering those homicides from a national perspective, the spread makes other possibilities far more plausible.

Polls use sample sizes much smaller than 3/4th all the time.

So, how is it not accurate?

Of course it is, we can conclude that about 51% of murderers were Black out of over 15,000.
What do polls have to do with unsolved homicides? Who are you polling, the dead bodies? That 51% of arrests. vs. 36% known black offenders for homicides means that
simply means 15% of black suspects were not verifiabe killers. Accordingly, they are innocent until proven guilty. That's one of the most sacred principles of the American justice system.

Yet, statistically curmudgeons with nefarious agendas project the race of dead bodies onto unknown killers who could, in reality, be of any. race.

The data really does support that about 51% of murderers are Black, and a number not much lower are Black murder victims.

The sample size is most certainly big enough to conclude the whole demographic.
Wow! You are confused! Table 43A clearly is labeled "arrests." And yes 51% of those arrested for murder were black. However Table 3 (labeled offenders) indicates that known Black offenders commited 36.7% -\of the murders occuring in 2015.

BTW... How do you recocile the fact that the number of arrestees in table 43A is lower than actual known offenders?

The sample size which is about 3/4th of the total data (Which is the majority of the data) is consistent with Blacks being behind roughly 1/2 of murders.

We know that also roughly 1/2 of those murdered are also Black, for which we have 4/4 of the data of, we know from the sample size that in most cases murder is Black, on Black overwhelmingly.

So sorry, but all evidence points to there being roughly 8,000 Black murders a year.
 
Whoa! Somebody had mac n cheese on Saturday! Move over Mr. Rockefeller!

I had Mac n Cheese with Lobster, Scallops, and Shrimp....


-81bd712a9588803b.jpg

Uh... The Poughkeepsie Ice House... Isn't McDonald's... But... Rather a beautiful restaurant, with good food.








Don't spend all your allowance in one place, leech.


So says guy who spends most of the day, and even much of the night here posting his primitive dribbles, and then thinks it's his right to call one a leech.... Frigging hilarious.
 
Whoa! Somebody had mac n cheese on Saturday! Move over Mr. Rockefeller!

I had Mac n Cheese with Lobster, Scallops, and Shrimp....


-81bd712a9588803b.jpg

Uh... The Poughkeepsie Ice House... Isn't McDonald's... But... Rather a beautiful restaurant, with good food.








Don't spend all your allowance in one place, leech.


So says guy who spends most of the day, and even much of the night here posting his primitive dribbles, and then thinks it's his right to call one a leech.... Frigging hilarious.



You described yourself as a leech, leech.
 
I had Mac n Cheese with Lobster, Scallops, and Shrimp....


-81bd712a9588803b.jpg

Uh... The Poughkeepsie Ice House... Isn't McDonald's... But... Rather a beautiful restaurant, with good food.








Don't spend all your allowance in one place, leech.


So says guy who spends most of the day, and even much of the night here posting his primitive dribbles, and then thinks it's his right to call one a leech.... Frigging hilarious.



You described yourself as a leech, leech.


So, says the guy who runs away every-time I bring up work... Now, why is that?

Nonsense... I've spent thousands to help my parents fix up the house, and also thousands treating my parents to dinner.
 

Uh... The Poughkeepsie Ice House... Isn't McDonald's... But... Rather a beautiful restaurant, with good food.








Don't spend all your allowance in one place, leech.


So says guy who spends most of the day, and even much of the night here posting his primitive dribbles, and then thinks it's his right to call one a leech.... Frigging hilarious.



You described yourself as a leech, leech.


...

Nonsense... I've spent thousands to help my parents fix up the house, and also thousands treating my parents to dinner.




Lots of children get an allowance for cutting the grass or taking out the trash, trash.
 
Uh... The Poughkeepsie Ice House... Isn't McDonald's... But... Rather a beautiful restaurant, with good food.








Don't spend all your allowance in one place, leech.


So says guy who spends most of the day, and even much of the night here posting his primitive dribbles, and then thinks it's his right to call one a leech.... Frigging hilarious.



You described yourself as a leech, leech.


...

Nonsense... I've spent thousands to help my parents fix up the house, and also thousands treating my parents to dinner.




Lots of children get an allowance for cutting the grass or taking out the trash, trash.


So, that's what you do, when you're not here mouthing off?
 
you've. attempted to assign several thousand unsolved homicides of black persons, which occured nationwide BTW ,
to black perps. That's a big assumption on your part. The truth is we don't know who killed those people. And your assertion that
Blacks "commited " 51% of all U.S. homicides in 2015, based on the arrest data from table 43 underlines your limited cognitive ability.
Table 3 accurately puts the known Black offender homicide rate at 36.7% of the 15, 000+ homicides for that year.

Finally...i could probably be more receptive to the notion of assigning all or most of the unknown perps of black homicides to blacks if only urban areas were involved. However, when considering those homicides from a national perspective, the spread makes other possibilities far more plausible.

Polls use sample sizes much smaller than 3/4th all the time.

So, how is it not accurate?

Of course it is, we can conclude that about 51% of murderers were Black out of over 15,000.
What do polls have to do with unsolved homicides? Who are you polling, the dead bodies? That 51% of arrests. vs. 36% known black offenders for homicides means that
simply means 15% of black suspects were not verifiabe killers. Accordingly, they are innocent until proven guilty. That's one of the most sacred principles of the American justice system.

Yet, statistically curmudgeons with nefarious agendas project the race of dead bodies onto unknown killers who could, in reality, be of any. race.

The data really does support that about 51% of murderers are Black, and a number not much lower are Black murder victims.

The sample size is most certainly big enough to conclude the whole demographic.
Wow! You are confused! Table 43A clearly is labeled "arrests." And yes 51% of those arrested for murder were black. However Table 3 (labeled offenders) indicates that known Black offenders commited 36.7% -\of the murders occuring in 2015.

BTW... How do you recocile the fact that the number of arrestees in table 43A is lower than actual known offenders?

The sample size which is about 3/4th of the total data (Which is the majority of the data) is consistent with Blacks being behind roughly 1/2 of murders.

We know that also roughly 1/2 of those murdered are also Black, for which we have 4/4 of the data of, we know from the sample size that in most cases murder is Black, on Black overwhelmingly.

So sorry, but all evidence points to there being roughly 8,000 Black murders a year.
You keep reffering to sample sizes and polls.
neither of which can. be used to quantify unsolved murders because the victim can't be interviewed...they're dead.
Your first lesson assignment is to learn the difference between the FBI UCR and the National Crime victimization Survey.

8000 blacks may have been murdered in 2015 but only 5620 of those murders
are known to have been commited by blacks.
The rest could have been murdered by any race...

Ponder the sheer number of small towns and rural hamlets that dot the American landscape. One unsolved murder of a black could be murdered in 3000 of them per year
and no one would notice. People like you read news papers or watch the nedia. Coverage , then automatically think urban gangs are responsible.
 
Last edited:
Polls use sample sizes much smaller than 3/4th all the time.

So, how is it not accurate?

Of course it is, we can conclude that about 51% of murderers were Black out of over 15,000.
What do polls have to do with unsolved homicides? Who are you polling, the dead bodies? That 51% of arrests. vs. 36% known black offenders for homicides means that
simply means 15% of black suspects were not verifiabe killers. Accordingly, they are innocent until proven guilty. That's one of the most sacred principles of the American justice system.

Yet, statistically curmudgeons with nefarious agendas project the race of dead bodies onto unknown killers who could, in reality, be of any. race.

The data really does support that about 51% of murderers are Black, and a number not much lower are Black murder victims.

The sample size is most certainly big enough to conclude the whole demographic.
Wow! You are confused! Table 43A clearly is labeled "arrests." And yes 51% of those arrested for murder were black. However Table 3 (labeled offenders) indicates that known Black offenders commited 36.7% -\of the murders occuring in 2015.

BTW... How do you recocile the fact that the number of arrestees in table 43A is lower than actual known offenders?

The sample size which is about 3/4th of the total data (Which is the majority of the data) is consistent with Blacks being behind roughly 1/2 of murders.

We know that also roughly 1/2 of those murdered are also Black, for which we have 4/4 of the data of, we know from the sample size that in most cases murder is Black, on Black overwhelmingly.

So sorry, but all evidence points to there being roughly 8,000 Black murders a year.
You keep reffering to sample sizes and polls.
neither of which can. be used to quantify unsolved murders because the victim can't be interviewed...they're dead.
Your first lesson assignment is to learn the difference between the FBI UCR and the National Crime victimization Survey.

8000 blacks may have been murdered in 2015 but only 5620 of those murders
are known to have been commited by blacks.
The rest could have been murdered by any race...

Ponder the sheer number of small towns and rural hamlets that dot the American landscape. One unsolved murder of a black could be murdered in 3000 of them per year
and no one would notice. People like you read news papers or watch the nedia. Coverage , then automatically think urban gangs are responsible.

The data shows that close to 90% of Blacks who are murdered are murdered by Blacks, the data shows that roughly 1/2 of those murdered are Black, and that close to 1/2 of those who murdered are Black.

Therefor when reviewing the data, yes everything fits with roughly half of murderers in the U.S.A being Black.
 
What do polls have to do with unsolved homicides? Who are you polling, the dead bodies? That 51% of arrests. vs. 36% known black offenders for homicides means that
simply means 15% of black suspects were not verifiabe killers. Accordingly, they are innocent until proven guilty. That's one of the most sacred principles of the American justice system.

Yet, statistically curmudgeons with nefarious agendas project the race of dead bodies onto unknown killers who could, in reality, be of any. race.

The data really does support that about 51% of murderers are Black, and a number not much lower are Black murder victims.

The sample size is most certainly big enough to conclude the whole demographic.
Wow! You are confused! Table 43A clearly is labeled "arrests." And yes 51% of those arrested for murder were black. However Table 3 (labeled offenders) indicates that known Black offenders commited 36.7% -\of the murders occuring in 2015.

BTW... How do you recocile the fact that the number of arrestees in table 43A is lower than actual known offenders?

The sample size which is about 3/4th of the total data (Which is the majority of the data) is consistent with Blacks being behind roughly 1/2 of murders.

We know that also roughly 1/2 of those murdered are also Black, for which we have 4/4 of the data of, we know from the sample size that in most cases murder is Black, on Black overwhelmingly.

So sorry, but all evidence points to there being roughly 8,000 Black murders a year.
You keep reffering to sample sizes and polls.
neither of which can. be used to quantify unsolved murders because the victim can't be interviewed...they're dead.
Your first lesson assignment is to learn the difference between the FBI UCR and the National Crime victimization Survey.

8000 blacks may have been murdered in 2015 but only 5620 of those murders
are known to have been commited by blacks.
The rest could have been murdered by any race...

Ponder the sheer number of small towns and rural hamlets that dot the American landscape. One unsolved murder of a black could be murdered in 3000 of them per year
and no one would notice. People like you read news papers or watch the nedia. Coverage , then automatically think urban gangs are responsible.

The data shows that close to 90% of Blacks who are murdered are murdered by Blacks, the data shows that roughly 1/2 of those murdered are Black, and that close to 1/2 of those who murdered are Black.

Therefor when reviewing the data, yes everything fits with roughly half of murderers in the U.S.A being Black.
Yawwwen...whatever. You are content to deal with assumptions rather than facts. Let others following this dialogue weigh the evidence themselves. I'm done.
 
The data really does support that about 51% of murderers are Black, and a number not much lower are Black murder victims.

The sample size is most certainly big enough to conclude the whole demographic.
Wow! You are confused! Table 43A clearly is labeled "arrests." And yes 51% of those arrested for murder were black. However Table 3 (labeled offenders) indicates that known Black offenders commited 36.7% -\of the murders occuring in 2015.

BTW... How do you recocile the fact that the number of arrestees in table 43A is lower than actual known offenders?

The sample size which is about 3/4th of the total data (Which is the majority of the data) is consistent with Blacks being behind roughly 1/2 of murders.

We know that also roughly 1/2 of those murdered are also Black, for which we have 4/4 of the data of, we know from the sample size that in most cases murder is Black, on Black overwhelmingly.

So sorry, but all evidence points to there being roughly 8,000 Black murders a year.
You keep reffering to sample sizes and polls.
neither of which can. be used to quantify unsolved murders because the victim can't be interviewed...they're dead.
Your first lesson assignment is to learn the difference between the FBI UCR and the National Crime victimization Survey.

8000 blacks may have been murdered in 2015 but only 5620 of those murders
are known to have been commited by blacks.
The rest could have been murdered by any race...

Ponder the sheer number of small towns and rural hamlets that dot the American landscape. One unsolved murder of a black could be murdered in 3000 of them per year
and no one would notice. People like you read news papers or watch the nedia. Coverage , then automatically think urban gangs are responsible.

The data shows that close to 90% of Blacks who are murdered are murdered by Blacks, the data shows that roughly 1/2 of those murdered are Black, and that close to 1/2 of those who murdered are Black.

Therefor when reviewing the data, yes everything fits with roughly half of murderers in the U.S.A being Black.
Yawwwen...whatever. You are content to deal with assumptions rather than facts. Let others following this dialogue weigh the evidence themselves. I'm done.

Of the known data which is 100% known, roughly 49% of murder victims were Black.

Of the known data which is 100% known, roughly 91% of Blacks murdered, were murdered by Blacks.

Of the known data which is about 75% known, roughly 51% of murderers were Black.

Therefor everything fits together for roughly 51% of the murderers being Black.
 

Forum List

Back
Top