97% of Scientists agree..........Al Gore knows what he is talking about

[rightwinger]

Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real - Science Fair: Science and Space News - USATODAY.com

Forget the four out of five dentists who recommend Trident…. Try the 97 out of 100 scientists that believe in man-made climate change.

This data comes from a new survey out this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The study found that 97 percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is "very likely" caused mainly by human activity.

The report is based on questions posed to 1,372 scientists. Nearly all the experts agreed that it is "very likely that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth's average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century."

As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues, as measured by publication and citation rates.

 

[Oddball]

Um...Not so fast, Skippy.

Climate change sceptics have smaller members, uglier wives, dumber kids' says new study made up by warmists

Are there really no depths to which ManBearPig-worshippers will not stoop in order to shore up their intellectually, morally and scientifically bankrupt cause?

Apparently not, as we see from the latest “study” – based on a petty, spiteful, Stasi-like blacklist produced by an obscure Canadian warmist – outrageously aggrandised by being published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Scientists were grouped as “convinced” or “unconvinced”, and researchers examined how many times they had published papers on the climate.

The results showed that “unconvinced” scientists accounted for just three of the 100 most prolific authors on the subject, while papers by “convinced” scientists were more frequently cited in other research.​

Well, no s***, Sherlock. And might this have anything to do, perchance, with the fact that – as the Climategate emails made abundantly clear – “unconvinced” scientists were deliberately shut out of the peer-review process by the “convinced” ones?

UK Telegraph

 

[Yurt]

lol...al gore was all about warming...now these guys alter the term to simply change and this means they agree al gore is right

 

[StevenC]

"very likely"

This shows they are just guessing at the cause.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Caught with their fat fucking asses tipping the scale again!

This is how you can tell they're full of crap

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Um...Not so fast, Skippy.

Climate change sceptics have smaller members, uglier wives, dumber kids' says new study made up by warmists

Are there really no depths to which ManBearPig-worshippers will not stoop in order to shore up their intellectually, morally and scientifically bankrupt cause?

Apparently not, as we see from the latest “study” – based on a petty, spiteful, Stasi-like blacklist produced by an obscure Canadian warmist – outrageously aggrandised by being published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Scientists were grouped as “convinced” or “unconvinced”, and researchers examined how many times they had published papers on the climate.

The results showed that “unconvinced” scientists accounted for just three of the 100 most prolific authors on the subject, while papers by “convinced” scientists were more frequently cited in other research.​

Well, no s***, Sherlock. And might this have anything to do, perchance, with the fact that – as the Climategate emails made abundantly clear – “unconvinced” scientists were deliberately shut out of the peer-review process by the “convinced” ones?

UK Telegraph

"The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)."

This is like saying we polled the members at USMB who post dire man made global warming thread and they thought...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real - Science Fair: Science and Space News - USATODAY.com

Forget the four out of five dentists who recommend Trident…. Try the 97 out of 100 scientists that believe in man-made climate change.

This data comes from a new survey out this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The study found that 97 percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is "very likely" caused mainly by human activity.

The report is based on questions posed to 1,372 scientists. Nearly all the experts agreed that it is "very likely that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth's average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century."

As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues, as measured by publication and citation rates.

Epic Fail. Should probably be its own poster

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Man made climate change is not real. Nobody with common sense believes in it anymore. Even the support from the Euro-weenies has dropped. Move on.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real - Science Fair: Science and Space News - USATODAY.com

Forget the four out of five dentists who recommend Trident…. Try the 97 out of 100 scientists that believe in man-made climate change.

This data comes from a new survey out this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The study found that 97 percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is "very likely" caused mainly by human activity.

The report is based on questions posed to 1,372 scientists. Nearly all the experts agreed that it is "very likely that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth's average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century."

As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues, as measured by publication and citation rates.

Hate to call you a liar like this, but that article does not mention Al Gore at all.

 

[Oddball]

Um...Not so fast, Skippy.

Climate change sceptics have smaller members, uglier wives, dumber kids' says new study made up by warmists

Are there really no depths to which ManBearPig-worshippers will not stoop in order to shore up their intellectually, morally and scientifically bankrupt cause?

Apparently not, as we see from the latest “study” – based on a petty, spiteful, Stasi-like blacklist produced by an obscure Canadian warmist – outrageously aggrandised by being published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Scientists were grouped as “convinced” or “unconvinced”, and researchers examined how many times they had published papers on the climate.

The results showed that “unconvinced” scientists accounted for just three of the 100 most prolific authors on the subject, while papers by “convinced” scientists were more frequently cited in other research.​

Well, no s***, Sherlock. And might this have anything to do, perchance, with the fact that – as the Climategate emails made abundantly clear – “unconvinced” scientists were deliberately shut out of the peer-review process by the “convinced” ones?

UK Telegraph

"The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)."

This is like saying we polled the members at USMB who post dire man made global warming thread and they thought...

I've peer reviewed this post and find it 100% accurate.

 

[skookerasbil]

Another irrelevant thread by Rightwinger...........about something irrelevant!!

If it mattered.............Crap and Trade would be a chip shot field goal. Instead..........the legislation is RADIOACTIVE and stands about as much a chance of passing in Obama-want form as Rightwinger does going out to get a snow cone on a street corner in Crown Heights Brooklyn on a summer night!!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Um...Not so fast, Skippy.



UK Telegraph

"The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)."

This is like saying we polled the members at USMB who post dire man made global warming thread and they thought...

I've peer reviewed this post and find it 100% accurate.

We have a Consensus that the Warmers are full of crap

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real - Science Fair: Science and Space News - USATODAY.com

Forget the four out of five dentists who recommend Trident…. Try the 97 out of 100 scientists that believe in man-made climate change.

This data comes from a new survey out this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The study found that 97 percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is "very likely" caused mainly by human activity.

The report is based on questions posed to 1,372 scientists. Nearly all the experts agreed that it is "very likely that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth's average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century."

As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues, as measured by publication and citation rates.

Damn! What will Dude say? Oops! He's already lecturing you and most scientists.


I'll sit back and enjoy the show

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Man made climate change is not real. Nobody with common sense believes in it anymore. Even the support from the Euro-weenies has dropped. Move on.

keeper

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real - Science Fair: Science and Space News - USATODAY.com

Forget the four out of five dentists who recommend Trident…. Try the 97 out of 100 scientists that believe in man-made climate change.

This data comes from a new survey out this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The study found that 97 percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is "very likely" caused mainly by human activity.

The report is based on questions posed to 1,372 scientists. Nearly all the experts agreed that it is "very likely that anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for most of the unequivocal warming of the Earth's average global temperature in the second half of the twentieth century."

As for the 3 percent of scientists who remain unconvinced, the study found their average expertise is far below that of their colleagues, as measured by publication and citation rates.

Damn! What will Dude say? Oops! He's already lecturing you and most scientists.


I'll sit back and enjoy the show

Dude blew the thread up with his first reply:

"The study examined 1,372 scientists who had taken part in reviews of climate science or had put their name to statements regarding the key findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)."

Oopsies!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The video presentation states that the recent warming cannot be explained by natural activities?

What recent warming?

What happened to water vapor?

Yes, Anthropogenic Atmospheric Homeopathy is the one and only answer.

What a fucking joke. If I were studying real science at any college or University I'd start a petition to put you Warmers with Ghostbusters

 

[rightwinger]

Man made climate change is not real. Nobody with common sense believes in it anymore. Even the support from the Euro-weenies has dropped. Move on.

Typical Right Wing Response

Scientists may have numbers and stuff...but they lack "common sense"

No wonder so many apply the same term to Sarah Palin

 

[rightwinger]

The video presentation states that the recent warming cannot be explained by natural activities?

What recent warming?

What happened to water vapor?

Yes, Anthropogenic Atmospheric Homeopathy is the one and only answer.

What a fucking joke. If I were studying real science at any college or University I'd start a petition to put you Warmers with Ghostbusters

Damn Frankie!

97% of Scientists say you are full of shit...

But rightwingnuts still buy into your act

 

[Oddball]

Damn Frankie!

97% of Scientists say you are full of shit...

But rightwingnuts still buy into your act

Right...97% of "scientists" who've been involved with the IPCC.

Really easy to get the results you want, when you fish in the pool that has the highest likelihood of giving you the responses you want to get, isn't it?

Didn't go through the link I posted in #2, didja?

 

[Misty]

Please tell me you're joking Rightwinger and we can move forward amicably.

Algore to the rescue~Whooooosssshhhhh.