Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Dante, Sep 14, 2009.
just the facts ma'am...
the truth...armed with science and facts
Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics
The widely accepted account that hijackers commandeered and crashed the four 9/11 planes is supported by reams of evidence, from cockpit recordings to forensics to the fact that crews and passengers never returned home. Nonetheless, conspiracy theorists seize on a handful of "facts" to argue a very different scenario: The jets that struck New York and Washington, D.C., weren't commercial planes, they say, but something else, perhaps refueling tankers or guided missiles. And the lack of military intervention? Theorists claim it proves the U.S. government instigated the assault or allowed it to occur in order to advance oil interests or a war agenda.
oh shut with your popular mechanics only a complete idiot would think that determining the the facts of 9/11 should be left to some magazine...the commission failed and lead investigators of NIST call their own reports questionable and call for new investigations...and this is the source of popular mechanics theory's
Popular Mechanics and Jim Meigs have been running diversion for the Official Govt Cover Stories from day one!
My rebuttal to the Popular Mechanics WTC-7 Article is here on the old Loose Change Board if anybody is interested. I have tried and tried to draw any Popular Mechanics Writer into a real debate on these 9/11 Topics for years and nobody has the courage. Jim Meigs is an Official Cover Story COWARD with no business trying to prop himself up as an expert on commercial building/demolition (#3). A much better source is AE911Truth.org and a group of professional architects and engineers who know full well that the WTC skyscrapers were taken down by Controlled Demolition.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUdhdTXHcn4"]WTC-7 = Definitely Controlled Demolition. Period!![/ame]
This overbuilt 47-Story Skyscraper . . .
. . . was transformed into this neat little pile . . .
. . . in 6.6 seconds. Do the math (my WTC-7 CD Topic) . . .
Good job Dev
Popular Mechanics have done a very good job at refuting all of the 9/11 conspiracy theories. They are renowned science experts. That's why the foilers hate them.
exactly.well said.Knock it off with those idiot fairy tales of popular mechanics Dev.David Ray Griffith for instance has proven they are full of lies and disinformation in his book DEBUNKING THE 9/11 DEBUNKING.and anwer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory.Griffith unlike Popular mechanics,actually does research.He interviewed many engineers,physists,scientists,intel officers,first responders,firefighters and demolition experts and listened to what the the designers of the towers said BEFORE 9/11. Popular mechanics didnt interview ANYBODY who wasnt connected to government firms.give it up with your pathetic Popular mechanics laughs already.
View attachment 8113
yeah thats what you 9/11 conspiracy theorists who support the official version are alright Kwc,a bunch of cuckoo cuckoo birds in denial.we already know that much.no need to tell us the obvious.
All thats armed with is fairy tales,disinformation, and lies idiot.
this guy is a renowned science expert..lol...he cant even effectively debate a DJ
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U2xS9j4zTQ]YouTube - Popular Mechanics OWNED by 9/11 Truth Part 1/2[/ame]
Separate names with a comma.