911/WTC Conspiracy Theories Debunked

Procrustes Stretched

And you say, "Oh my God, am I here all alone?"
Dec 1, 2008
60,094
7,377
1,840
Positively 4th Street
just the facts ma'am...
To investigate 16 of the most prevalent claims made by conspiracy theorists, POPULAR MECHANICS assembled a team of nine researchers and reporters who, together with PM editors, consulted more than 70 professionals in fields that form the core content of this magazine, including aviation, engineering and the military.

In the end, we were able to debunk each of these assertions with hard evidence and a healthy dose of common sense. We learned that a few theories are based on something as innocent as a reporting error on that chaotic day. Others are the byproducts of cynical imaginations that aim to inject suspicion and animosity into public debate. Only by confronting such poisonous claims with irrefutable facts can we understand what really happened on a day that is forever seared into world history.

the truth...armed with science and facts
 
Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics
The widely accepted account that hijackers commandeered and crashed the four 9/11 planes is supported by reams of evidence, from cockpit recordings to forensics to the fact that crews and passengers never returned home. Nonetheless, conspiracy theorists seize on a handful of "facts" to argue a very different scenario: The jets that struck New York and Washington, D.C., weren't commercial planes, they say, but something else, perhaps refueling tankers or guided missiles. And the lack of military intervention? Theorists claim it proves the U.S. government instigated the assault or allowed it to occur in order to advance oil interests or a war agenda.
:cuckoo:
 
oh shut with your popular mechanics only a complete idiot would think that determining the the facts of 9/11 should be left to some magazine...the commission failed and lead investigators of NIST call their own reports questionable and call for new investigations...and this is the source of popular mechanics theory's
 
Hi Dev:

Popular Mechanics and Jim Meigs have been running diversion for the Official Govt Cover Stories from day one!

just the facts ma'am...To investigate 16 of the most prevalent claims made by conspiracy theorists, POPULAR MECHANICS assembled a team of nine researchers and reporters who, together with PM editors, consulted more than 70 professionals in fields that form the core content of this magazine, including aviation, engineering and the military . . .
My rebuttal to the Popular Mechanics WTC-7 Article is here on the old Loose Change Board if anybody is interested. I have tried and tried to draw any Popular Mechanics Writer into a real debate on these 9/11 Topics for years and nobody has the courage. Jim Meigs is an Official Cover Story COWARD with no business trying to prop himself up as an expert on commercial building/demolition (#3). A much better source is AE911Truth.org and a group of professional architects and engineers who know full well that the WTC skyscrapers were taken down by Controlled Demolition.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUdhdTXHcn4"]WTC-7 = Definitely Controlled Demolition. Period!![/ame]

This overbuilt 47-Story Skyscraper . . .

fig-5-20.jpg


. . . was transformed into this neat little pile . . .

wtc7-debris.jpg


. . . in 6.6 seconds. Do the math (my WTC-7 CD Topic) . . .

GL,

Terral
 
Last edited:
Good job Dev

Popular Mechanics have done a very good job at refuting all of the 9/11 conspiracy theories. They are renowned science experts. That's why the foilers hate them.
 
oh shut with your popular mechanics only a complete idiot would think that determining the the facts of 9/11 should be left to some magazine...the commission failed and lead investigators of NIST call their own reports questionable and call for new investigations...and this is the source of popular mechanics theory's

exactly.well said.Knock it off with those idiot fairy tales of popular mechanics Dev.David Ray Griffith for instance has proven they are full of lies and disinformation in his book DEBUNKING THE 9/11 DEBUNKING.and anwer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory.Griffith unlike Popular mechanics,actually does research.He interviewed many engineers,physists,scientists,intel officers,first responders,firefighters and demolition experts and listened to what the the designers of the towers said BEFORE 9/11. Popular mechanics didnt interview ANYBODY who wasnt connected to government firms.:cuckoo:give it up with your pathetic Popular mechanics laughs already.
 
oh shut with your popular mechanics only a complete idiot would think that determining the the facts of 9/11 should be left to some magazine...the commission failed and lead investigators of nist call their own reports questionable and call for new investigations...and this is the source of popular mechanics theory's

exactly.well said.knock it off with those idiot fairy tales of popular mechanics dev.david ray griffith for instance has proven they are full of lies and disinformation in his book debunking the 9/11 debunking.and anwer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory.griffith unlike popular mechanics,actually does research.he interviewed many engineers,physists,scientists,intel officers,first responders,firefighters and demolition experts and listened to what the the designers of the towers said before 9/11. Popular mechanics didnt interview anybody who wasnt connected to government firms.:cuckoo:give it up with your pathetic popular mechanics laughs already.

 
oh shut with your popular mechanics only a complete idiot would think that determining the the facts of 9/11 should be left to some magazine...the commission failed and lead investigators of nist call their own reports questionable and call for new investigations...and this is the source of popular mechanics theory's

exactly.well said.knock it off with those idiot fairy tales of popular mechanics dev.david ray griffith for instance has proven they are full of lies and disinformation in his book debunking the 9/11 debunking.and anwer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory.griffith unlike popular mechanics,actually does research.he interviewed many engineers,physists,scientists,intel officers,first responders,firefighters and demolition experts and listened to what the the designers of the towers said before 9/11. Popular mechanics didnt interview anybody who wasnt connected to government firms.:cuckoo:give it up with your pathetic popular mechanics laughs already.


yeah thats what you 9/11 conspiracy theorists who support the official version are alright Kwc,a bunch of cuckoo cuckoo birds in denial.we already know that much.no need to tell us the obvious.
 
Last edited:
just the facts ma'am...
To investigate 16 of the most prevalent claims made by conspiracy theorists, POPULAR MECHANICS assembled a team of nine researchers and reporters who, together with PM editors, consulted more than 70 professionals in fields that form the core content of this magazine, including aviation, engineering and the military.

In the end, we were able to debunk each of these assertions with hard evidence and a healthy dose of common sense. We learned that a few theories are based on something as innocent as a reporting error on that chaotic day. Others are the byproducts of cynical imaginations that aim to inject suspicion and animosity into public debate. Only by confronting such poisonous claims with irrefutable facts can we understand what really happened on a day that is forever seared into world history.

the truth...armed with science and facts

All thats armed with is fairy tales,disinformation, and lies idiot.
 
Good job Dev

Popular Mechanics have done a very good job at refuting all of the 9/11 conspiracy theories. They are renowned science experts. That's why the foilers hate them.

this guy is a renowned science expert..lol...he cant even effectively debate a DJ

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U2xS9j4zTQ]YouTube - Popular Mechanics OWNED by 9/11 Truth Part 1/2[/ame]
 
Good job Dev

Popular Mechanics have done a very good job at refuting all of the 9/11 conspiracy theories. They are renowned science experts. That's why the foilers hate them.

The only thing Popular Mechanics has done is show what true idiots you guys are for swallowing their lies and propaganda and showing how you Bush dupes can be brainwashed by lies and propaganda so easily.:cuckoo:They are good at ONE thing,refuting the official conspiray THEORY that muslims and Bin Laden were behind the attacks and that the planes caused the towers to fall.:lol: As usual,Eots took you to school on WHY Popular Mechanics is full of shit.:lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top