9/12 exaggerators are using forums like this to create a "Google bomb"

what if we whined incessantly about you little bitches starting so many Joe Wilson threads?? :lol::lol::lol:
 
Hi Vast:

Various right-wing bloggers, some on this very board, have apparently been tasked to create a "Google Bomb" by making as many threads as possible on the subject.

I probably have more 911Truth Topics started on this fine USMB Board than anybody and have been 'tasked' by nobody connected to any 9/12 Bullony!!! Here is a listing of just a few:

Flight 93/Shanksville
Flight 77/Pentagon
WTC-7 Controlled Demolition
9:31
Pentagon Timeline
DoD Manipulated Fire And Firemen
Flight 77 Never Crashed Near The Pentagon
April Gallop Was Injured During 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike
9:31 AM Missile Strike: Answers To Bill Veale's Questions
"9/11 Press For Truth" Continues: The Video
Secret Bush-Clinton-FED Pakistani Accounts Linked To 9/11 Attacks
Dick Cheney, Karl Rove And Donald Rumsfeld Have Been Murdering Americans
Rebuttal To CIT Claims About What "Did Not" Hit The Pentagon
Poll: Who Supports The Official 9/11 Cover Stories

In said threads they are attempting to falsely inflate the number of demonstrators involved in the 9/12 protest from the 60-70 thousand number provided to ABC News by the DC Fire Department to around 2 million.

Your assertion is RIDICULOUS!!! The Glenn Beck 9/12 Movement is run by bunch of Fox News Idiots who would NOT know 'the' 911Truth from the man in the cotton-picking-moon!!! Glenn Beck is one of the most 'clueless' :)confused:) idiots regarding 9/11 on this planet. He should get 9/11 'right' before trying to start any 9/12 Movement . . .

Said posters continuously start new threads when they are proven incorrect on another thread.

Click on any of my 911Truth Topics and start 'debunking' . . . :0)

Shouldn't the moderators be doing something about this?

Listen here you 9/11 dimwit :)cuckoo:): Every registered USMB member has the same right to present his or her version of 'the' 911Truth using whatever they consider to be 'credible evidence.' The mods are here to ensure that everyone has the same opportunity to present their interpretations of the evidence on 'a level playing field' and according to the same Code Of Conduct rules that apply to EVERYONE the very same way. Vast needs to belly up to the bar and tell us what he/she sees in this Official Govt Photograph:

My Flight 93 Topic:

93crash2.jpg


George Bush and Karl Rove and Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and Vast say that a real 100-Ton Jetliner crashed into this EMPTY HOLE. However, Vast is the only one of theses Inside-Job Cover Story Cronies arguing that the moderators should 'do something' to STOP me from simply stating 'the' 911Truth!!!

crater-stahl.jpg


Here is another picture of the EMPTY HOLE with grass growing on all the inclines/slopes, because this EMPTY HOLE was already in this empty field on April 20, 1994 (U.S. Geological Survey Pic). << Click on the Photograph!!

If Vast had his/her way, then nobody would have the right to present 'the' 911Truth, and only George Bush's Conspiracy Theory . . .

BushieBadGuys.jpg


. . . would see the light of day and we already know that George Bush is A LIAR:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60"]The Liar And Chief[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgfzqulvhlQ"]There Are A LOT Of People Who LIE And Get Away With It . . .[/ame]

GL,

Terral
 
Last edited:
Various right-wing bloggers, some on this very board, have apparently been tasked to create a "Google Bomb" by making as many threads as possible on the subject.

In said threads they are attempting to falsely inflate the number of demonstrators involved in the 9/12 protest from the 60-70 thousand number provided to ABC News by the DC Fire Department to around 2 million.

Said posters continuously start new threads when they are proven incorrect on another thread.


Shouldn't the moderators be doing something about this?
tin-foil-hat.jpg
 
Hi Vast:

Various right-wing bloggers, some on this very board, have apparently been tasked to create a "Google Bomb" by making as many threads as possible on the subject.

I probably have more 911Truth Topics started on this fine USMB Board than anybody and have been 'tasked' by nobody connected to any 9/12 Bullony!!! Here is a listing of just a few:
Wrong 9/12, knuckleknob. :lol:
 
Various right-wing bloggers, some on this very board, have apparently been tasked to create a "Google Bomb" by making as many threads as possible on the subject.

In said threads they are attempting to falsely inflate the number of demonstrators involved in the 9/12 protest from the 60-70 thousand number provided to ABC News by the DC Fire Department to around 2 million.

Said posters continuously start new threads when they are proven incorrect on another thread.


Shouldn't the moderators be doing something about this?

Haha! so are you one of them? :lol:
 
Why so afraid??? Clearly, there were a lot of people there. Obsessing about "the count" is the real spam.

There's no difference between the 70,000 who were maybe there and the two million they pretend were there in order to pretend they aren't loons?

sorry.... the liars got a pants on fire from politifact...that's good enough to call them on it... I know how the wingers hate truth, but they really should stop spewing....

or maybe they should go post more threads on how obama's going to kill their grandma's :cuckoo:

Tea party" photo shows huge crowd &#8212; at different event
By Catharine Richert
Published on Monday, September 14th, 2009 at 11:34 a.m.

Related rulings:

Photo of "tea party" protests shows crowd sprawling from Capitol to Washington Monument
Bloggers, Saturday, September 12th, 2009.

Ruling: Pants on Fire! | Details

Bookmark this story:
Buzz up!ShareThis
Bloggers said this photo showed a gargantuan crowd at Saturday's "tea party" protest. But it apparently was taken in 1997 at a Promise Keepers rally.
In the competitive world of Washington protests, crowd size is often a matter of dispute. Organizers usually boast of huge crowds, while police and the news media offer much smaller estimates.

So supporters of Saturday&#8217;s &#8220;tea party&#8221; protests against President Barack Obama were quick to highlight their big turnout. To bolster countless claims on blogs and Facebook, many posted a photograph that showed a gargantuan crowd sprawling from Capitol Hill down the National Mall to the Washington Monument.

But it turns out the photo is more than 10 years old, apparently taken during a 1997 Promise Keepers rally.

On Saturday, estimates about the crowd spread quickly through the conservative blogosphere. Many writers, including author Michelle Malkin, pegged the number of people between 1 million and 2 million. Those reports were largely based on information from people in the crowd.

Malkin, for example, updated her blog at 12:34 p.m. noting that, &#8220;Police estimate 1.2 million in attendance. ABC News reporting crowd at 2 million,&#8221; and she cited a Twitter post from Tabitha Hale, writer of Pink Elephant Pundit, who was in Washington for the protest.

Many bloggers said the media was unfairly reporting much smaller numbers, and many included the photo.

&#8220;I have no doubt that Washington Democrats are well aware of how many people turned out, even as their media outlets try to downplay the event,&#8221; said Power Line, a conservative blog that linked to the photograph from Say Anything, another conservative Web site.

&#8220; 'Media&#8217; estimates range from 60,000 to 500,000 to around 2 million (yes, 2,000,000),&#8221; wrote John G. Winder for the conservative blog Cypress Times. &#8220;Those estimates, the language employed, and the visuals chosen for use in reporting the rally and representing the people gathered, vary greatly based solely on bias.&#8221;

In the mainstream media, crowd estimates varied.

The New York Times reported that &#8220;thousands&#8221; of protesters &#8220;filled the west lawn of the Capitol and spilled onto the National Mall,&#8221; while Fox News wrote that &#8220;tens of thousands&#8221; marched on Washington. CNN said &#8220;reporters at the scene described the massive crowd as reaching the tens of thousands.&#8221;

Pete Piringer, public affairs officer for the D.C. Fire and Emergency Department, said the local government no longer provides official crowd estimates because they can become politicized. But the day of the rally, Piringer unofficially told one reporter that he thought between 60,000 and 75,000 people had shown up.

&#8220;It was in no way an official estimate,&#8221; he said.

We asked Piringer whether there were enough protesters to fill the National Mall, as depicted in the photograph.

&#8220;It was an impressive crowd,&#8221; he said. But after marching down Pennsylvania Avenue to the Capitol, the crowd &#8220;only filled the Capitol grounds, maybe up to Third Street,&#8221; he said.

Yet the photograph so widely posted showed the crowd sprawling all the way to the Washington Monument, which is bordered by 15th and and 17th Streets.

There&#8217;s another problem with the photograph: It doesn&#8217;t include the National Museum of the American Indian, a building located at the corner of Fourth Street and Independence Avenue that opened on Sept. 14, 2004. (Looking at the photograph, the building should be in the upper right hand corner of the National Mall, next to the Air and Space Museum.) That means the picture was taken before the museum opened exactly five years ago. So clearly the photo doesn&#8217;t show the &#8220;tea party&#8221; crowd from the Sept. 12 protest.

PolitiFact | "Tea party" photo shows huge crowd â&#8364;&#8221; at different event

This has been posted before...yet the nutbars are still claiming "it was a million...no, it was two million..."
 
Last edited:
Various right-wing bloggers, some on this very board, have apparently been tasked to create a "Google Bomb" by making as many threads as possible on the subject.

In said threads they are attempting to falsely inflate the number of demonstrators involved in the 9/12 protest from the 60-70 thousand number provided to ABC News by the DC Fire Department to around 2 million.

Said posters continuously start new threads when they are proven incorrect on another thread.


Shouldn't the moderators be doing something about this?

the Obamatron wants to call the thought police...lol
 
Looked like a pretty huge crowd to me on tv. Surely more than 60-70 thousand folks. I think you're not so accurate with your figures. If you got this info from the fine people at ABC News or the DC Fire Department that explains why you might be off the count by at least 1.3 million people. One's a liar and an Obama public service messenger and the other folks can't count to more than 21 and that's if they are naked. I'll let you figure out which group of info spreaders is which on your own.

I don't think anyone needs to obsess about the numbers. Members of Congress and their staffs saw what was happening, just like Johnson and Nixon and Vietnam protests. It was an 'oh shit!' moment.
 
Various right-wing bloggers, some on this very board, have apparently been tasked to create a "Google Bomb" by making as many threads as possible on the subject.

In said threads they are attempting to falsely inflate the number of demonstrators involved in the 9/12 protest from the 60-70 thousand number provided to ABC News by the DC Fire Department to around 2 million.

Said posters continuously start new threads when they are proven incorrect on another thread.


Shouldn't the moderators be doing something about this?

You can see the time picture just as well as we can, it looks like a whole lot more than 60-70 thousand. It appears that the crowd what ever the number has you a little worried.
 
Last edited:
Various right-wing bloggers, some on this very board, have apparently been tasked to create a "Google Bomb" by making as many threads as possible on the subject.

In said threads they are attempting to falsely inflate the number of demonstrators involved in the 9/12 protest from the 60-70 thousand number provided to ABC News by the DC Fire Department to around 2 million.

Said posters continuously start new threads when they are proven incorrect on another thread.


Shouldn't the moderators be doing something about this?
[Emphasis mine] Imagined inside information - one of the telltales of a conspiracist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top