9/11 Omission Hearings

Way to go ya fucking retard! You've proven exactly what I said! :lol: The FBI investigation was given higher priority than the 9/11 commission. Thanks for proving that. Now don't you feel silly, jackass?

Yeah right, like Bush never impeded FBI investigations into Saudi connections and 9-11.
O'Neill saw through Bush from the start and by the summer of 2001 declared that the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role Saudi Arabia played in furthering those interests. Bush not only thwarted an FBI investigation of the bin Laden family, he kept the specific nature of his family's business ties to the Bin Ladens as secret as Cheney's energy task force list. A few disturbing facts are known, however.

Unknown News - www.UnknownNews.net - The news you need, whether you know it or not.

Oil Interests

:lol: More proof of the utter dishonesty of Fucktard Jones. He couldn't find any information on Bush impeding the 9/11 PENTTBOM investigation, so he has to point to events PRIOR to 9/11! :lol: What a fucking piece of shit liar! Congratulations, Jones. You've lied yourself into a position of complete irrelevance.

Ah flailing about and distorting the original topic in question which was about Bush impeding and stonewalling the 9-11 commission.
You sit and spin shit that you can't rebuttal, but it is obvious to those that pay attention, you're a joke and a disgusting habitually dishonest shill, We see through your BS parrot. It's humorous to watch you desperately try to cover your lying and distorting ass :lol:
 
More Bush administration pressure on the 9-11 commission-
June 15, 2004: White House Lobbying Causes 9/11 Commission to Water Down Staff Report

White House lawyers send an angry letter to the 9/11 Commission, which causes the Commission to water down its staff report account of Vice President Dick Cheney’s actions on September 11. [Newsweek, 6/20/2004]
Context of 'June 15, 2004: White House Lobbying Causes 9/11 Commission to Water Down Staff Report'

And AGAIN the fucktard Jones can't understand the difference between PENTTBOM and the 9/11 commission! This is hilarious! Keep up the good work showing everyone what a fucking retard you are!
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_RoUCJbb4E]YouTube - ‪9/11 Omission Hearings - Nicholas Levis 9/11 Omission Dossier - 9/9/2004‬‏[/ame]
 
And there goes P F Spammore pretending videos from six years ago are in any way relevant when he couldn't even respond to the debunking of one of his videos with anything more than a one sentence snide remark. :lol: Got anything of actual value to add or are you just going to continue spamming the same tired old shit? Here's a hint. If it hasn't produced results in six years, it's not going to produce results.
 

Zelekow and Condoliza Rice rice co-authored a book together.
"The man who was running the investigation, and deciding what evidence he would allow in, or be seen, and the star witness were best buddies. Just imagine that situation in a trial, the "judge" and the "star witness" being best of friends."
No conflict of interest here, nope. Like the Bush's and Bin Ladens, nothing to see here folks move along :cuckoo:
 
"You can fool some of the people all of the time. Those are the ones you should concentrate on." ~ GW Bush

Why would Bush want to concentrate on you fucking losers? :lol:

We are not the ones suckered into believing everything he said.

Yet you gullible sheep will believe anything and everything conspriatards tell you. When you're shown they are wrong, you just move on to another conspiratard theory and pretend you weren't just proven a sap for believing someone who lies to you for profit.

In the mean time, you try (and fail) to pretend anyone who doesn't buy into the conspiratard theories that have no evidence to back them up should be believed over all the other evidence and anyone who believes the evidence is just being suckered into believing what Bush said.

Is Bush still in office? Has the official story changed? No? Then you're a fucking retard for believing this was all about what Bush said. :lol:
 
Why would Bush want to concentrate on you fucking losers? :lol:

We are not the ones suckered into believing everything he said.

Yet you gullible sheep will believe anything and everything conspriatards tell you. When you're shown they are wrong, you just move on to another conspiratard theory and pretend you weren't just proven a sap for believing someone who lies to you for profit.

In the mean time, you try (and fail) to pretend anyone who doesn't buy into the conspiratard theories that have no evidence to back them up should be believed over all the other evidence and anyone who believes the evidence is just being suckered into believing what Bush said.

Is Bush still in office? Has the official story changed? No? Then you're a fucking retard for believing this was all about what Bush said. :lol:

I don't believe or disbelieve much of anything on its face. Each piece of information is a piece of a puzzle. Some pieces fit together to form a picture that matches the facts on the ground. That information is probably true. Those pieces that don't fit are probably false.
 
We are not the ones suckered into believing everything he said.

Yet you gullible sheep will believe anything and everything conspriatards tell you. When you're shown they are wrong, you just move on to another conspiratard theory and pretend you weren't just proven a sap for believing someone who lies to you for profit.

In the mean time, you try (and fail) to pretend anyone who doesn't buy into the conspiratard theories that have no evidence to back them up should be believed over all the other evidence and anyone who believes the evidence is just being suckered into believing what Bush said.

Is Bush still in office? Has the official story changed? No? Then you're a fucking retard for believing this was all about what Bush said. :lol:

I don't believe or disbelieve much of anything on its face. Each piece of information is a piece of a puzzle. Some pieces fit together to form a picture that matches the facts on the ground. That information is probably true. Those pieces that don't fit are probably false.

If that were true, you would believe the official theory because none of the truthtard theories fit the known facts or make any sense in the real world.
 
Yet you gullible sheep will believe anything and everything conspriatards tell you. When you're shown they are wrong, you just move on to another conspiratard theory and pretend you weren't just proven a sap for believing someone who lies to you for profit.

In the mean time, you try (and fail) to pretend anyone who doesn't buy into the conspiratard theories that have no evidence to back them up should be believed over all the other evidence and anyone who believes the evidence is just being suckered into believing what Bush said.

Is Bush still in office? Has the official story changed? No? Then you're a fucking retard for believing this was all about what Bush said. :lol:

I don't believe or disbelieve much of anything on its face. Each piece of information is a piece of a puzzle. Some pieces fit together to form a picture that matches the facts on the ground. That information is probably true. Those pieces that don't fit are probably false.

If that were true, you would believe the official theory because none of the truthtard theories fit the known facts or make any sense in the real world.

You throw away too many pieces to be able to form a picture.
 
I don't believe or disbelieve much of anything on its face. Each piece of information is a piece of a puzzle. Some pieces fit together to form a picture that matches the facts on the ground. That information is probably true. Those pieces that don't fit are probably false.

If that were true, you would believe the official theory because none of the truthtard theories fit the known facts or make any sense in the real world.

You throw away too many pieces to be able to form a picture.

Gee, okay please tell us your theory of what happened that day in some reasonable detail.

Betcha won't.

Check please!

OUT!
 
If that were true, you would believe the official theory because none of the truthtard theories fit the known facts or make any sense in the real world.

You throw away too many pieces to be able to form a picture.

Gee, okay please tell us your theory of what happened that day in some reasonable detail.

Betcha won't.

Check please!

OUT!

Nineteen mostly Saudi Islamic terrorists attacked us because they hated us because we are free.

So we responded by attacking Iraq.
 
You throw away too many pieces to be able to form a picture.

Gee, okay please tell us your theory of what happened that day in some reasonable detail.

Betcha won't.

Check please!

OUT!

Nineteen mostly Saudi Islamic terrorists attacked us because they hated us because we are free.

So we responded by attacking Iraq.

Wrong. We did NOT attack Iraq because of 9/11. Nowhere in the list of reasons for the war in Iraq is 9/11 listed as a reason. Why do you insist on such blatant lies? See, when you start off with such retarded bullshit, it is no wonder you end up all confused and angry.
 
I don't believe or disbelieve much of anything on its face. Each piece of information is a piece of a puzzle. Some pieces fit together to form a picture that matches the facts on the ground. That information is probably true. Those pieces that don't fit are probably false.

If that were true, you would believe the official theory because none of the truthtard theories fit the known facts or make any sense in the real world.

You throw away too many pieces to be able to form a picture.

OK, how about you back that up with an example. Or are you just talking out your ass again in a vain attempt to try and seem intelligent?
 

Forum List

Back
Top