Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
false no laws of physics were changed violated or fucked with on 911....and unlike your preferred conspiracy theory, Sayit, no matter how wildly my vivid imagination had to run amok in order to spell-out the covert demo scenario, no long-established laws of physics had to be violated in the process.
...no laws of physics were changed violated or fucked with on 911. ...
...no matter how much you wish it to be so.
sorry only part of my post is on screen ....no laws of physics were changed violated or fucked with on 911. ...
Wholeheartedly agreed!
Now go tell it to the government's science lackeys at NIST.
...no matter how much you wish it to be so.
There you go again claiming to know my desires.
As I've told you in the past, generally speaking, I want nothing more than to believe something other than I presently do about the events of 9/11/01, but my beliefs have never been the fruition of personal preference, no matter how many more times you try to imply otherwise.
Here are some examples, of burning skyscrapers from around the world, that did not collapse, despite the fact that they suffered fires that burned longer, and engulfed more square footage of the structure.
Here are some examples, of burning skyscrapers from around the world, that did not collapse, despite the fact that they suffered fires that burned longer, and engulfed more square footage of the structure.
How many of them were slammed by large passenger jets at hundreds of mph?
The Popular Mechanics report is a whitewash and has more holes in it than WTC7 did.
The Popular Mechanics report is a whitewash and has more holes in it than WTC7 did.
Sooo ... you're saying the peeps at Pop Mechs were in on some 9/11 whitewash?Consider for a moment just how many would have to have been part of your CT from planning to execution to investigation to cover-up. Then consider that NO ONE has whispered a word. Remarkable, eh?
Here are some examples, of burning skyscrapers from around the world, that did not collapse, despite the fact that they suffered fires that burned longer, and engulfed more square footage of the structure.
How many of them were slammed by large passenger jets at hundreds of mph?
WTC7 didn't get hit by a plane.
Here are some examples, of burning skyscrapers from around the world, that did not collapse, despite the fact that they suffered fires that burned longer, and engulfed more square footage of the structure.
How many of them were slammed by large passenger jets at hundreds of mph?
WTC7 didn't get hit by a plane.
Sorry ... I didn't realize 7 was the subject. So how many of your skyscrapers were hit by large chunks of other buildings from hundreds of feet in the air?
The Popular Mechanics report is a whitewash and has more holes in it than WTC7 did.
Sooo ... you're saying the peeps at Pop Mechs were in on some 9/11 whitewash?Consider for a moment just how many would have to have been part of your CT from planning to execution to investigation to cover-up. Then consider that NO ONE has whispered a word. Remarkable, eh?
People have talked, and wound up dead. Barry Jennings is one of many examples.
The Popular Mechanics report is a whitewash and has more holes in it than WTC7 did.
Sooo ... you're saying the peeps at Pop Mechs were in on some 9/11 whitewash?Consider for a moment just how many would have to have been part of your CT from planning to execution to investigation to cover-up. Then consider that NO ONE has whispered a word. Remarkable, eh?
People have talked, and wound up dead. Barry Jennings is one of many examples.
Jennings offered no proof of a conspiracy. People die and Barry Jennings PASSED AWAY in 2008, seven years after 9/11 without providing any compelling evidence on the events of 9/11.
I am not saying Pop Mech was in on the conspiracy, but that article was a propaganda piece. The press does what the press does. Doesn't take much to push an agenda. But much of that article is factually incorrect, or simply doesn't address relevant material. I could give some examples I suppose.
I am not saying Pop Mech was in on the conspiracy, but that article was a propaganda piece. The press does what the press does. Doesn't take much to push an agenda. But much of that article is factually incorrect, or simply doesn't address relevant material. I could give some examples I suppose.
But you can't give any proof of a controlled CT on any of the WTC buildings which is where the "Truther" Movement runs into a wall. So what was Pop Mech's agenda?
I am not saying Pop Mech was in on the conspiracy, but that article was a propaganda piece. The press does what the press does. Doesn't take much to push an agenda. But much of that article is factually incorrect, or simply doesn't address relevant material. I could give some examples I suppose.
But you can't give any proof of a controlled CT on any of the WTC buildings which is where the "Truther" Movement runs into a wall. So what was Pop Mech's agenda?
Not their agenda really. They were just paid or instructed to put that story out there thats all.
You don't have to prove a conspiracy to know that we were lied to.