9/11 and British police misconduct

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Cozy, Jul 5, 2012.

  1. Cozy
    Offline

    Cozy Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hi all,

    This is a FOIA request I recently made to Thames Valley police in England regarding their collusion with the Metropolitan police (London) to conceal their mishandling of intelligence relating to 9/11 that they had in 1994.

    It is on the "what do they know.com" website to Thames Valley police under the heading "9/11 malfeasance" (Sorry I am not permitted to post a link) !


    Please support me by "following" the request.
     
  2. Rat in the Hat
    Offline

    Rat in the Hat Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,950
    Thanks Received:
    5,147
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ratings:
    +5,215
    You're saying 9/11 was planned all the way back in 1994?

    That would mean it was planned by Clinton instead of Booooosh. :eek:


    :cuckoo:
     
  3. daws101
    Offline

    daws101 BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2011
    Messages:
    41,528
    Thanks Received:
    3,041
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    ontario,ca not canada
    Ratings:
    +9,111
    do you smell bullshit too?
     
  4. Intense
    Offline

    Intense Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    44,909
    Thanks Received:
    5,849
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +5,863
  5. MHunterB
    Offline

    MHunterB Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    7,209
    Thanks Received:
    1,767
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +1,775
    I'd go with 'planned back in '94 - but NOT featuring Bush, Clinton or other Americans, etc. Maybe the guy who planned the '93 attack?
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2012
  6. daws101
    Offline

    daws101 BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2011
    Messages:
    41,528
    Thanks Received:
    3,041
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    ontario,ca not canada
    Ratings:
    +9,111
  7. Jos
    Offline

    Jos BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    7,412
    Thanks Received:
    733
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +733
  8. hjmick
    Offline

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,139
    Thanks Received:
    4,671
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +7,084
    Damn Brits!

    I say it is high time we dissolve our ties with the United Kingdom and start our own country!
     
  9. Swagger
    Offline

    Swagger Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    12,149
    Thanks Received:
    2,003
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    European Far Right
    Ratings:
    +5,505
    You can't "follow" the progress of a Freedom of Information Request. Besides, the kind of request you're attempting to con the weak of mind into believing may be in the progress of being disclosed falls within the threshold of being too vexatious to even consider disclosing to any would-be applicant.
     
  10. Cozy
    Offline

    Cozy Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hi, as strange as it might sound, you can indeed "follow" the progress of a Freedom of Information request simply by clicking on the "follow" button. Thames Valley police have concluded their internal review of their decision to refuse to disclose the information and they have not said that they consider my request vexatious. They have simply said that they are not confirming or denying that they have the information I have requested. As we all know, when a police force says that they are not confirming or denying something, it usually means that they have something to hide.
     

Share This Page