80% of Green Energy Loans Went to Obama Donors

[Lakhota]

80% of Green Energy Loans Went to Obama Donors

Did Haliburton get the other 20%?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Green energy is an initiative of Obama. He campaigned on it.....so to see that the loans went to those that supported Obama is really a non story. My guess is few, if any, donated to McCain.
I would have expected to see this....it means nothing....it is just basic logic.

Green energy has not proven to be a 24/7/365 day consistent power supply that is required for our economy. On the other hand, oil satisfies the requirement.
How's that for basic logic?

It's shit, from a logic perspective. It is illogical to claim that green energy should play no part in providing our energy requirements simply because it can't provide 100% of our energy requirements.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Then of course there's the side of the story that the irrational Right obstinately ignores:

Brookings: “DOE’s Loan Guarantee Program Will Likely Result in Minimal Costs and Large Gains for Taxpayers”

Brookings: "DOE

 

[skookerasbil]

Green energy is an initiative of Obama. He campaigned on it.....so to see that the loans went to those that supported Obama is really a non story. My guess is few, if any, donated to McCain.
I would have expected to see this....it means nothing....it is just basic logic.

Green energy has not proven to be a 24/7/365 day consistent power supply that is required for our economy. On the other hand, oil satisfies the requirement.
How's that for basic logic?

It's shit, from a logic perspective. It is illogical to claim that green energy should play no part in providing our energy requirements simply because it can't provide 100% of our energy requirements.

It'll a part s0n.........but no more than 10% of our energy needs. Thats just the way its gonna be. Only the nutters think otherwise.

The green energy movement is LOSING in spectacular fashion.......and wait'll 2013 when the real ball kick comes when natural gas ( fracking) and clean coal production goes into hyper-drive, not to mention far more domestic drilling for oil.

The fact is..........nobody gives a rats ass about this shit anymore as evidenced by ZERO carbon emissions legislation in the past 3 years. Of course, they did pass light bulb legislation to keep the k00ks in check.

 

[Stephanie]

That must be that NEW Hope and Change way..

It's really really NOT the Obama funneling (US TAXPAYERS) monies to his biggest DONORS.

so WHAT if they go bankrup. we all should just sit back and SHUT UP.

 

[Full-Auto]

Then of course there's the side of the story that the irrational Right obstinately ignores:

Brookings: “DOE’s Loan Guarantee Program Will Likely Result in Minimal Costs and Large Gains for Taxpayers”

Brookings: "DOE

He sure got that one wrong.

What else do you not have?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Then of course there's the side of the story that the irrational Right obstinately ignores:

Brookings: “DOE’s Loan Guarantee Program Will Likely Result in Minimal Costs and Large Gains for Taxpayers”

Brookings: "DOE

He sure got that one wrong.

What else do you not have?

Go ahead and refute it point by point, with your own facts.

Or STFU.

 

[Big Fitz]

80% of Green Energy Loans Went to Obama Donors

Did Haliburton get the other 20%?

At least Haliburton is a proven company providing a proven source of energy that has been a Godsend for almost 2 centuries with a few more centuries worth of energy and production to go.

Who gives a fuck? You know... to people who actually could pay the loans back not waste it and then plead bankruptcy. It should all have gone to proven energy sources, not blue sky pollyanna wishful thinking that has been shown to be HIGHLY ineffective to political hacks and flunkies of a failed administration and governmental policy.

 

[Full-Auto]

Then of course there's the side of the story that the irrational Right obstinately ignores:

Brookings: “DOE’s Loan Guarantee Program Will Likely Result in Minimal Costs and Large Gains for Taxpayers”

Brookings: "DOE

He sure got that one wrong.

What else do you not have?

Go ahead and refute it point by point, with your own facts.

Or STFU.

SOLYNDRA NOT ONLY DISPUTES IT. It makes a fool of your claim.........

 

[zonly1]

Green energy is an initiative of Obama. He campaigned on it.....so to see that the loans went to those that supported Obama is really a non story. My guess is few, if any, donated to McCain.
I would have expected to see this....it means nothing....it is just basic logic.

Green energy has not proven to be a 24/7/365 day consistent power supply that is required for our economy. On the other hand, oil satisfies the requirement.
How's that for basic logic?

It's shit, from a logic perspective. It is illogical to claim that green energy should play no part in providing our energy requirements simply because it can't provide 100% of our energy requirements.

It's illogical for you to conclude that green energy satisfies a 24/7/365 power supply b/c you are either ignorant or being obtuse. In this case, I believe both conclusions.

 

[Avatar4321]

run ads against Obama. Paint him for the corrupt official he is.

 

[Lakhota]

Well, even if true (which I doubt from wingnut sources like Breitbart and Heritage), Democrats deserved a little taste after Bush/Cheney and Haliburton raped the U.S. Treasury and doubled the national debt (Reagan tripled it).

 

[zonly1]

If you want to go fishing for leftwing wing anal opinions, Lahota finds the mark.

 

[daveman]

Well, even if true (which I doubt from wingnut sources like Breitbart and Heritage), Democrats deserved a little taste after Bush/Cheney and Haliburton raped the U.S. Treasury and doubled the national debt (Reagan tripled it).

No one deserves to be corrupt, you mindless idiot.

Typical leftist. Condemns actions by conservatives, and applauds those same actions when done by liberals.

If leftists didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.

 

[daveman]

If you want to go fishing for leftwing wing anal opinions, Lahota finds the mark.

The Following User Says Thank You to zonly1 For This Useful Post:
Lakhota (Today)​

 

[zonly1]

If you want to go fishing for leftwing wing anal opinions, Lahota finds the mark.

The Following User Says Thank You to zonly1 For This Useful Post:
Lakhota (Today)​

I stink he meant to mark disapprove on the rep with a remark in negatory range.

 

[Wry Catcher]

When President-elect Obama came to Washington in late 2008, he was outspoken about the need for an economic stimulus to revive a struggling economy… After he was sworn in as president, he proclaimed that taxpayer money would assuredly not be doled out to political friends… …

But an examination of grants and guaranteed loans offered by just one stimulus program run by the Department of Energy, for alternative-energy projects, is stunning. The so-called 1705 Loan Guarantee Program and the 1603 Grant Program channeled billions of dollars to all sorts of energy companies… …

In the 1705 government-backed-loan program [alone], for example, $16.4 billion of the $20.5 billion in loans granted as of Sept. 15 went to companies either run by or primarily owned by Obama financial backers—individuals who were bundlers, members of Obama’s National Finance Committee, or large donors to the Democratic Party. The grant and guaranteed-loan recipients were early backers of Obama before he ran for president, people who continued to give to his campaigns and exclusively to the Democratic Party in the years leading up to 2008. . . . . .

…These programs might be the greatest—and most expensive—example of crony capitalism in American history. Tens of billions of dollars went to firms controlled or owned by fundraisers, bundlers, and political allies, many of whom—surprise!—are now raising money for Obama again.

Report: 80% of DOE Green Energy Loans Went to Obama Backers

Can anyone say that's why Obama won't release any real records about Solyndra??????

Gee, golly grasshoppers what a surprise. Since those who reject Obama's forward looking agenda - the drill baby drill crowd - deny fossil fuels harm our environment and oppose every new idea as a threat to capitalism who do you 'think' applied for and received loans and grants?