80% magic in Wisconsin

R

rdean

Guest
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?
 
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?

Well, the schools were able to hire more teachers and the state had a surplus instead of debit for a change. Having public union employees contribute a bit to their own retirement and benefits, like the rest of us do, was good for the state. How can those teachers claim they want what is best for the children when taking extra cushy benefits, at cost to tax payers, meant fewer teachers, less money on actual needs for students and a state in debt?

Many support Walker because he had the courage to stand up to unions and expect the public union members to pay their fair share.
 
Last edited:
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?
So is most of Kathleen Falk's and Tom Barrett's.

Speaking of which...

May 8th Recall Primary Election | Wisconsin | onPolitix
 
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?

Well, the schools were able to hire more teachers and the state had a surplus instead of debit for a change. Having public union employees contribute a bit to their own retirement and benefits, like the rest of us do, was good for the state. How can those teachers claim they want what is best for the children when taking extra cushy benefits, at cost to tax payers, meant fewer teachers, less money on actual needs for students a state in debt?
All that and taxes didn't go up, either.
 
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?

this has been repeatedly posted in various threads. all of which you either ignore or claim are bogus.

Go fuck yourself, troll.
 
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?

Well, the schools were able to hire more teachers and the state had a surplus instead of debit for a change. Having public union employees contribute a bit to their own retirement and benefits, like the rest of us do, was good for the state. How can those teachers claim they want what is best for the children when taking extra cushy benefits, at cost to tax payers, meant fewer teachers, less money on actual needs for students a state in debt?
All that and taxes didn't go up, either.

It just goes to show how much money was going to public unions.
 
In Wisconsin, there is one bar for every ten people. Explains alot. <----joke.

But there are A LOT of Bars per capita there.
 
In Wisconsin, there is one bar for every ten people. Explains alot. <----joke.

But there are A LOT of Bars per capita there.
State statute for small town in WI:

4 houses, combination of 2 churches or bars.
 
I would think it's obvious what the importance of wisconsin is. Wisconsin is the front line of the battle. That's why you are doing everything you can to get rid of Walker and while Republicans are doing everything they can to keep him in.

Why do you feign ignorance of the importance of races that you already know the answer to?

Walker stood up to the Unions and was effective and has been an excellent leader. If the Unions beat him, it will stifle other Governors in their efforts to combat waste in their budget. The Unions know this which is why they are going all out against him.

The Public Unions have to be defeated or this nation will be held hostage by them, go bankrupt and destroy itself.
 
In Wisconsin, there is one bar for every ten people. Explains alot. <----joke.

But there are A LOT of Bars per capita there.
State statute for small town in WI:

4 houses, combination of 2 churches or bars.

lol too true. I used to spend half my check in a little bar in Watertown, WI. Then the rest in Oconomowoc the next night hehe.

Ahhh to be in my early 20's again.
 
I would think it's obvious what the importance of wisconsin is. Wisconsin is the front line of the battle. That's why you are doing everything you can to get rid of Walker and while Republicans are doing everything they can to keep him in.

Why do you feign ignorance of the importance of races that you already know the answer to?

Walker stood up to the Unions and was effective and has been an excellent leader. If the Unions beat him, it will stifle other Governors in their efforts to combat waste in their budget. The Unions know this which is why they are going all out against him.

The Public Unions have to be defeated or this nation will be held hostage by them, go bankrupt and destroy itself.

I agree with your assessment about the front lines but I stand on the other side of that line. Good post though.
 
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?

Well, the schools were able to hire more teachers and the state had a surplus instead of debit for a change. Having public union employees contribute a bit to their own retirement and benefits, like the rest of us do, was good for the state. How can those teachers claim they want what is best for the children when taking extra cushy benefits, at cost to tax payers, meant fewer teachers, less money on actual needs for students and a state in debt?

Many support Walker because he had the courage to stand up to unions and expect the public union members to pay their fair share.

So Wisconsin was able to cut nearly a billion from education and still hire more teachers? Cushy benefits? How many jobs did he bring to the state? How many businesses moved there?

If you're going to make these statements, provide a few "facts". That's the least you could do.
 
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?

He gave TEACHER union workers freedom of choice!
NOT any other group but teachers.
Freedom to JOIN a union not forced to join if the teacher wanted a job!
Freedom to PAY dues to the union... NOT forced to have it deducted!

Remember this is the USA where freedom of choice was the founding premise.

NOT being forced into slavery to PAY a handful of union leaders high salaries, bonuses, benefits from teachers dues!

NOT being forced to have 90% of teachers' DUES sent to the Democrat party!

So what is so wrong with giving teachers that freedom of choice?
 
Magic ...where? One thing you can count on is when it comes to unions the left never forgets. Teachers violated state law by calling in sick to riot and democrat politicians left their posts and fled to another state like criminals rather than be forced to do their freaking duty but the left hates the governor because the union was stripped of a little of their collective bargaining so that tax payers would get a break from funding lavish pensions for municipal workers.
 
Watching the news, this is what they said:

Seems like 80% is important in Wisconsin. Seems nearly 80% of of the money spent in Wisconsin this year was spent by Republicans who are fighting to keep Scott Walker.

Seems 80% of Scott Walker's money comes from "out-of-state".

So, right wingers, what is it about Scott Walker that makes you want to keep him? What has he done for Wisconsin that was so good for the state?

Well, the schools were able to hire more teachers and the state had a surplus instead of debit for a change. Having public union employees contribute a bit to their own retirement and benefits, like the rest of us do, was good for the state. How can those teachers claim they want what is best for the children when taking extra cushy benefits, at cost to tax payers, meant fewer teachers, less money on actual needs for students and a state in debt?

Many support Walker because he had the courage to stand up to unions and expect the public union members to pay their fair share.

So Wisconsin was able to cut nearly a billion from education and still hire more teachers? Cushy benefits? How many jobs did he bring to the state? How many businesses moved there?

If you're going to make these statements, provide a few "facts". That's the least you could do.

the facts of the good things Walker has accomplished in WI have been repeatedly posted, links and all. You, as you are now, ignore them or call them lies.
You're a troll. This is a troll thread.
 

Forum List

Back
Top