78% of Palestinians Support Suicide Bombing of Civilians

What is that, someones blog, On what poll does he base his rant?
link to poll
A summary or list of other polls.

And why don't we have the links for those other polls?
Geez are you guys grasping at straws or what? The links to the various polls are on the main website itself, some are from the NY Times, some are from Arab sources, some are from Pew, etc. Obviously you aren't competent enough to understand the simple flow of information and it's transfer.
 
Wishful thinking on your part.

In what appeared to be a partial retraction of some of his findings against Israel, Goldstone argued that he would have written the report differently had Israel cooperated at the time of his inquiry.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, immediately called on the United Nations to shelve the Goldstone Report; Ehud Barak, the defence minister, demanded an apology; and Avigdor Lieberman, the foreign minister, said Israel’s actions in Gaza had been “vindicated”.

Israel would certainly like observers to interpret Goldstone’s latest comments as an exoneration. In reality, however, he offered far less consolation to Israel than its supporters claim.

The report’s original accusation that Israeli soldiers committed war crimes still stands, as does criticism of Israel’s use of unconventional weapons such as white phosphorus, the destruction of property on a massive scale, and the taking of civilians as human shields.
It's time to embrace the horror...
Goldstone totally recanted most of it, when he realized critical information about Palestinian savagery was hidden from. Keep up will you.
 
What is that, someones blog, On what poll does he base his rant?
link to poll

It's a survey the man conducted by himself in his room, after a heated debate with the bathroom mirror.

Interesting that Arte and quite a few others find this survey more reliable than the one conucted by the US-based World Opinion Group, but of course this has nothing to do with the results of this survey fitting their preconceptions.

It's an interesting thing when posters would prefer unreliable data over reliable data, because the reliable one provides uncomfortable information.
It's not like one of your outlandish claims that exposes your ignorance and lies. No.
 
Wishful thinking on your part.

In what appeared to be a partial retraction of some of his findings against Israel, Goldstone argued that he would have written the report differently had Israel cooperated at the time of his inquiry.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, immediately called on the United Nations to shelve the Goldstone Report; Ehud Barak, the defence minister, demanded an apology; and Avigdor Lieberman, the foreign minister, said Israel’s actions in Gaza had been “vindicated”.

Israel would certainly like observers to interpret Goldstone’s latest comments as an exoneration. In reality, however, he offered far less consolation to Israel than its supporters claim.

The report’s original accusation that Israeli soldiers committed war crimes still stands, as does criticism of Israel’s use of unconventional weapons such as white phosphorus, the destruction of property on a massive scale, and the taking of civilians as human shields.
It's time to embrace the horror...
Goldstone totally recanted most of it, when he realized critical information about Palestinian savagery was hidden from. Keep up will you.

And what, exactly, did he recant?
 
Wishful thinking on your part.

It's time to embrace the horror...
Goldstone totally recanted most of it, when he realized critical information about Palestinian savagery was hidden from. Keep up will you.

And what, exactly, did he recant?
The whole report fell apart because he discovered the Palestinian claims were either false or unfounded. In other words, everything. Not the first time the Palestinians have been caught lying and it won't be the last.
 
Goldstone totally recanted most of it, when he realized critical information about Palestinian savagery was hidden from. Keep up will you.

And what, exactly, did he recant?
The whole report fell apart because he discovered the Palestinian claims were either false or unfounded. In other words, everything. Not the first time the Palestinians have been caught lying and it won't be the last.

Not!

Try again.
 
Yup! Hamas bloodsuckers lied. What else is new.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/goldstone-claims-of-israel-s-gaza-war-crimes-should-be-reconsidered-1.353630

While Israel has shown to probe itself "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted." "Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

While Israel has shown to probe itself* "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted."

"Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."
 
Last edited:
Yup! Hamas bloodsuckers lied. What else is new.

While Israel has shown to probe itself "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted." "Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

While Israel has shown to probe itself* "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted."

"Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

Got a link?
 
What is that, someones blog, On what poll does he base his rant?
link to poll

It's a survey the man conducted by himself in his room, after a heated debate with the bathroom mirror.

Interesting that Arte and quite a few others find this survey more reliable than the one conucted by the US-based World Opinion Group, but of course this has nothing to do with the results of this survey fitting their preconceptions.

It's an interesting thing when posters would prefer unreliable data over reliable data, because the reliable one provides uncomfortable information.

You really are exposing yourself here as simply a bald-faced liar. The research you quoted clearly indicates overwhelming majorities of Palestinians and other Moslims (more than 78%) support certain terrorist attacks against the US. Your credibility is now about zero.
 
Yup! Hamas bloodsuckers lied. What else is new.

While Israel has shown to probe itself "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted." "Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

While Israel has shown to probe itself* "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted."

"Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

Got a link?
Click on the first paragraph, idiot.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/goldstone-claims-of-israel-s-gaza-war-crimes-should-be-reconsidered-1.353630
 
Last edited:
What is that, someones blog, On what poll does he base his rant?
link to poll

It's a survey the man conducted by himself in his room, after a heated debate with the bathroom mirror.

Interesting that Arte and quite a few others find this survey more reliable than the one conucted by the US-based World Opinion Group, but of course this has nothing to do with the results of this survey fitting their preconceptions.

It's an interesting thing when posters would prefer unreliable data over reliable data, because the reliable one provides uncomfortable information.

You really are exposing yourself here as simply a bald-faced liar. The research you quoted clearly indicates overwhelming majorities of Palestinians and other Moslims (more than 78%) support certain terrorist attacks against the US. Your credibility is now about zero.
Welcome to the club arte. I told you I wouldn't trust this piece of shit as far as I could spit. Saigon is an imposter and a liar, not to mention a terrorist lover.
 
Yup! Hamas bloodsuckers lied. What else is new.

While Israel has shown to probe itself "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted." "Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

While Israel has shown to probe itself* "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted."

"Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

Got a link?
Click on the first paragraph, idiot.
PFT can't find links to anything. I tend to believe he couldn't find his ass with both hands, What a dingleberry.
 
Yup! Hamas bloodsuckers lied. What else is new.

While Israel has shown to probe itself "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted." "Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

While Israel has shown to probe itself* "to a significant degree" over Gaza war actions, Goldstone wrote, Hamas, who has been in control of the coastal enclave since 2007, "has done nothing." The former jurist also criticizes the UN Human Rights Council's anti-Israel bias, saying that he had hoped that the report could "begin a new era of evenhandedness at the UN Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted."

"Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations," Goldstone added, saying that his report "found evidence of potential war crimes and 'possibly crimes against humanity' by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets."

Got a link?
Click on the first paragraph, idiot.

Did that, doesn't work.
 
Got a link?
Click on the first paragraph, idiot.

Did that, doesn't work.
Goldstone: Claims of Israel's Gaza war crimes should be reconsidered - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Writing in a Washington Post column published on Friday, Goldstone noted Israeli efforts to investigate wrongdoings by soldiers and commanders during the Gaza war, saying that war crime allegations against Israel would have been influenced by the evidence provided by such probes.

"We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the UN Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report," Goldstone wrote, adding: "If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document."

In other words, the information Goldstone based his report on, which came mostly from Hamas, WERE ALL LIES AND FABRICATIONS. WHOOP DE DOO!
 
Click on the first paragraph, idiot.

Did that, doesn't work.
Goldstone: Claims of Israel's Gaza war crimes should be reconsidered - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Writing in a Washington Post column published on Friday, Goldstone noted Israeli efforts to investigate wrongdoings by soldiers and commanders during the Gaza war, saying that war crime allegations against Israel would have been influenced by the evidence provided by such probes.

"We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the UN Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report," Goldstone wrote, adding: "If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document."

In other words, the information Goldstone based his report on, which came mostly from Hamas, WERE ALL LIES AND FABRICATIONS. WHOOP DE DOO!

In other words, Goldstone rolled over to Israeli pressure.

Little if anything changed.
 
Did that, doesn't work.
Goldstone: Claims of Israel's Gaza war crimes should be reconsidered - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Writing in a Washington Post column published on Friday, Goldstone noted Israeli efforts to investigate wrongdoings by soldiers and commanders during the Gaza war, saying that war crime allegations against Israel would have been influenced by the evidence provided by such probes.

"We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the UN Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report," Goldstone wrote, adding: "If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document."

In other words, the information Goldstone based his report on, which came mostly from Hamas, WERE ALL LIES AND FABRICATIONS. WHOOP DE DOO!

In other words, Goldstone rolled over to Israeli pressure.

Little if anything changed.
Geez, if it doesn't go according to Hamas and Tinmore's way, then someone rolled over. Of course the ACTUAL TRUTH that Hamas lied and fabricated tales, didn't play a part did it?
 
Goldstone: Claims of Israel's Gaza war crimes should be reconsidered - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Writing in a Washington Post column published on Friday, Goldstone noted Israeli efforts to investigate wrongdoings by soldiers and commanders during the Gaza war, saying that war crime allegations against Israel would have been influenced by the evidence provided by such probes.

"We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the UN Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report," Goldstone wrote, adding: "If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document."

In other words, the information Goldstone based his report on, which came mostly from Hamas, WERE ALL LIES AND FABRICATIONS. WHOOP DE DOO!

In other words, Goldstone rolled over to Israeli pressure.

Little if anything changed.
Geez, if it doesn't go according to Hamas and Tinmore's way, then someone rolled over. Of course the ACTUAL TRUTH that Hamas lied and fabricated tales, didn't play a part did it?

The Goldstone Report still matches human rights and journalist's reports and facts on the ground.

The only thing different is Israel's interpretation of what happened.
 
Did that, doesn't work.
Goldstone: Claims of Israel's Gaza war crimes should be reconsidered - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Writing in a Washington Post column published on Friday, Goldstone noted Israeli efforts to investigate wrongdoings by soldiers and commanders during the Gaza war, saying that war crime allegations against Israel would have been influenced by the evidence provided by such probes.

"We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the UN Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report," Goldstone wrote, adding: "If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document."

In other words, the information Goldstone based his report on, which came mostly from Hamas, WERE ALL LIES AND FABRICATIONS. WHOOP DE DOO!



In other words, Goldstone rolled over to Israeli pressure.

Little if anything changed.

When Richard Goldstone returned home to South Africa last May for his grandson’s bar mitzvah — an event that he was almost unable to paticipate in because of protests planned against him — he also attended a separate meeting whose details were kept secret until now.

In the wake of Goldstone’s bombshell retraction of a key finding in the famous report that bears his name, those aware of what occurred at that meeting, individuals who have known him through the years, felt moved to disclose what happened. They joined many others in puzzling over what had prompted the famous jurist to change his mind — and, they hoped, Israel’s fate.

The meeting, an official parlay between Goldstone and a cross-section of 10 of the South African Jewish community’s top leaders, had a profound impact on Goldstone, said one participant and another senior official briefed on it afterward.

“Debating face to face with the community really shook him,” said David Saks, associate director of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies, who received a read-out on the meeting right after it took place. “When he saw the extent of the anger and he couldn’t answer the accusations against him… I think he realized he was wrong.”
:eusa_whistle:

Read more: Did a Private Meeting Prompt Goldstone To Change His Mind?
 

Forum List

Back
Top