Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Again, the echo chamber speaks (of course, all in one voice). As usual one very good investigative technique is, follow the money: who benefits? Scientists (LOL) or industrialists?
Long ago people shit in the rivers from which they drank; those who deny that human activity impacts the ecology negatively are as ignorant. Worse, those who deny climate change today are willfully ignorant, for political partisan reasons or too stupid to see what is happening around the globe.
To them, one data point (gee, it's cold today) is sufficent to disprove something is happening. Those who suggest it's not human activity, but a natural set of events, hold opinions manufactured for them by those whose sole purpose in life is wealth and power (and most of the echo chamber claim to be 'independent thinkers', they are not independent, nor are they thinkers).
Not to mention the feeling of joy from drinking carbonated beverages, I just love the way it tickles my throat going down. More CO2 now!!! I want more!!!
Again, the echo chamber speaks (of course, all in one voice). As usual one very good investigative technique is, follow the money: who benefits? Scientists (LOL) or industrialists?
Long ago people shit in the rivers from which they drank; those who deny that human activity impacts the ecology negatively are as ignorant. Worse, those who deny climate change today are willfully ignorant, for political partisan reasons or too stupid to see what is happening around the globe.
To them, one data point (gee, it's cold today) is sufficent to disprove something is happening. Those who suggest it's not human activity, but a natural set of events, hold opinions manufactured for them by those whose sole purpose in life is wealth and power (and most of the echo chamber claim to be 'independent thinkers', they are not independent, nor are they thinkers).
Nor are individuals slaves to the State.
Again, the echo chamber speaks (of course, all in one voice). As usual one very good investigative technique is, follow the money: who benefits? Scientists (LOL) or industrialists?
Long ago people shit in the rivers from which they drank; those who deny that human activity impacts the ecology negatively are as ignorant. Worse, those who deny climate change today are willfully ignorant, for political partisan reasons or too stupid to see what is happening around the globe.
To them, one data point (gee, it's cold today) is sufficent to disprove something is happening. Those who suggest it's not human activity, but a natural set of events, hold opinions manufactured for them by those whose sole purpose in life is wealth and power (and most of the echo chamber claim to be 'independent thinkers', they are not independent, nor are they thinkers).
Nor are individuals slaves to the State.
The biggest polluter today, BP, Haliburton and/or Transocean as evidenced by the damage done to the Gulf of Mexico and the shoreline of the Southern United States. Also, the oil cartel, the battery makers and tire manufacturers who manipulated the dismantling of public transportation systems throughout the U.S. in the 1950's and 1960's; and, fools like yourself who reject the notion that green, renewable energy, is the future and continue to protect polluters so callous they want their own life back even while hundreds of thousands of Americans wonder when they will begin to earn a living again.
Nor are individuals slaves to the State.
The biggest polluter today, BP, Haliburton and/or Transocean as evidenced by the damage done to the Gulf of Mexico and the shoreline of the Southern United States. Also, the oil cartel, the battery makers and tire manufacturers who manipulated the dismantling of public transportation systems throughout the U.S. in the 1950's and 1960's; and, fools like yourself who reject the notion that green, renewable energy, is the future and continue to protect polluters so callous they want their own life back even while hundreds of thousands of Americans wonder when they will begin to earn a living again.
They were working when Bush was President
The biggest polluter today, BP, Haliburton and/or Transocean as evidenced by the damage done to the Gulf of Mexico and the shoreline of the Southern United States. Also, the oil cartel, the battery makers and tire manufacturers who manipulated the dismantling of public transportation systems throughout the U.S. in the 1950's and 1960's; and, fools like yourself who reject the notion that green, renewable energy, is the future and continue to protect polluters so callous they want their own life back even while hundreds of thousands of Americans wonder when they will begin to earn a living again.
They were working when Bush was President
Boooooooooooooooosh. Of course, so were the nearly 5,000 GI's (for the time they lived) you freaking moron. Only a fool would chose to go by 'Crusader', of course not having empathy, or the historical knowledge of what the crusades - as well as the inquisitions - were, puts you in the educational and intellectual camp of booooooooooosh.
They were working when Bush was President
Boooooooooooooooosh. Of course, so were the nearly 5,000 GI's (for the time they lived) you freaking moron. Only a fool would chose to go by 'Crusader', of course not having empathy, or the historical knowledge of what the crusades - as well as the inquisitions - were, puts you in the educational and intellectual camp of booooooooooosh.
Momma told me not pick on the retards.
Boooooooooooooooosh. Of course, so were the nearly 5,000 GI's (for the time they lived) you freaking moron. Only a fool would chose to go by 'Crusader', of course not having empathy, or the historical knowledge of what the crusades - as well as the inquisitions - were, puts you in the educational and intellectual camp of booooooooooosh.
Momma told me not pick on the retards.
More evidence you're a fool.
Despite what you hear here, Old Rocks ISN'T alone.
Broad Public Backing for Greenhouse Gas Regulation - The Numbers
This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone June 3-6, 2010, among a
random national sample of 1,004 adults, including landline and cell-phone-only
respondents. Results for the full sample have a 3.5-point error margin. Sampling, data
collection and tabulation by TNS of Horsham, PA.
17. (HALF SAMPLE) On another subject, do you think the federal government should or
should not regulate the release of greenhouse gases from sources like power plants,
cars and factories in an effort to reduce global warming? Do you feel that way
strongly or somewhat?
Despite what you hear here, Old Rocks ISN'T alone.
Broad Public Backing for Greenhouse Gas Regulation - The Numbers
LOL just to remind all of you always always check the links hidden in oldoscks and son's linked sources...
I followed the link to the questions they asked in their little poll of only a little over 1100 people by phone.... Here is what I found...
This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone June 3-6, 2010, among a
random national sample of 1,004 adults, including landline and cell-phone-only
respondents. Results for the full sample have a 3.5-point error margin. Sampling, data
collection and tabulation by TNS of Horsham, PA.
17. (HALF SAMPLE) On another subject, do you think the federal government should or
should not regulate the release of greenhouse gases from sources like power plants,
cars and factories in an effort to reduce global warming? Do you feel that way
strongly or somewhat?
One question? THats it??? HAHAHAHAHAHA! Waht a poll.. 1100 people and only one question and thats it... And the numbers are fudged too....
heres the PDF...http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1110a6GreenhouseGasresults.pdf
THe little numbers chart gets fudged in the quote on here so take a look for yourselves and get a good laugh..... LOL
You may notice that 52% said strongly and only 19% said somewhat in favor for legislation on CO2 emissions.. And 19% strongly disagreed with it and 7% somewhat disagreed, and 4% didnt have an opinion on it.... BUt wait look closely at the numbers on the left and right side of the chart.... OMG, they changed the order of the numbers on the right... WTF? why did they do that it makes it misleading and confusing....
Yeah they did that to bullshit you.....LOL nice work trolls......LOL
Well, that doesn't post that well.
I want to see the internals on that poll. I smell bullshit.Despite what you hear here, Old Rocks ISN'T alone.
Broad Public Backing for Greenhouse Gas Regulation - The Numbers
...and interweb moonbats who cite polls from obviously biased sources.I want to see the internals on that poll. I smell bullshit.Despite what you hear here, Old Rocks ISN'T alone.
Broad Public Backing for Greenhouse Gas Regulation - The Numbers
UK Grows more skeptical on Climate Change
Most Americans oppose Climate Change Bill
American's belief in global warming cools
Americans turning off climate change
As exposed today on the Jason Lewis show.
Cap and Tax legislation as currently proposed would cost between 200 and 360 BILLION dollars extra for US households. An average of $2000 per family a year. These predictions were the result of findings by the CBO and Heritage Foundation.
Citizens would also be given less freedom to choose temperatures of their home, products they can buy, distances they can travel, places they can work due to industry costs killing small business... The devastation to the economy will be horrific as we place yet another barrier and the ability to compete in the world market.
So whattever Konjob. There are lies, damn lies, statistics, estimates, computer models and opinion polls.
