7 Glaring Omissions In The Mueller Report That Kill Its Credibility

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,703
27,648
2,430
While there is much within the Mueller report that suggests skepticism was well-founded, what is perhaps most probative is what the report omitted.


7 Glaring Omissions In The Mueller Report That Kill Its Credibility
April 23, 2019 ~ By Ben Weingarten
Robert Mueller’s special counsel was presented to the American public as unimpeachable. From its beginning, a distinct minority in politics and media, including several Federalist writers, were skeptical, citing the special counsel’s past prosecutorial abuses, the past alleged misconduct of its pivotal investigators, and the team’s peculiar partisan makeup.... Once in action, its seemingly limitless powers, heavy-handed usage of such powers, and more questionable if not dubious indictments, far removed from “collusion,” seemed to confirm our worst fears. While there is much within the Mueller report that further suggests this skepticism was well-founded, what is perhaps most probative is what the report omitted.
By presenting the collusion section as it did, similarly to the obstruction section, the counsel damaged the Trump administration to the greatest extent possible without affirming its criminality. It seems that Mueller pulled a Comey.... We must have a thorough investigation of the investigators. The growing cacophony of attacks on Attorney General William Barr are a testament to it.


~~~~~~
An excellent article by Ben Weingarten... Indeed, the Mueller report was just an extension of the effort to cover up what Democrats had done and to persecute Trump. Mueller used the same tactics as Comey. He left the maximum amount of innuendo in his report so that the MSM could continue to smear Trump. In essence, Robert Mueller managed a sloppy dishonest team of unethical and immoral lawyers who did not do an objective report or as close as one could come but a partisan cut and paste recasting of the facts. This is what happens when you don’t choose the best as SC, but the handiest. No, collusion isn't a crime. However, if you collude and except money from a foreign government is. The collusion is when you blame someone else for what you did? That IS a crime! And Hillary has about 146 Million from it. The Mueller "investigation" was half cover up and half coup d'état. Covering up the crimes committed by Hillary and on behalf of Hillary. Attempting to overturn the election she lost.The investigation was far more criminal than anything it pretended to look into. Now, the head of the "crime family" has issued his "report".
It's more of the same.
 
maxresdefault.jpg
 
Mueller switched from collusion to trying to get Trump on obstruction for the past 18 months.

Obstructing and investigation into a crime he was cleared of.

Fucking hilarious.
 
He is guilty of both, collusion (conspiracy) and obstruction.

I mean they got Bill for lying about a blow job, and what tramp did was aided and abetted with out adversary to win an election and obstructed justice and is still obstructing justice. He is a huge GD stain on the presidency.
 
Its an incomplete report since Trump wasn’t subpoenaed. IF you’re investigating the local PTA, the first person you talk to is the head of the PTA… Trump’s lawyers got a bunch of questions they crafted answers to likely never consulting the blob for any of them. Whenever something would be incriminating, the “I don’t recall” phrase was invoked (27 times over 10 questions).
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
He is guilty of both, collusion (conspiracy) and obstruction.

I mean they got Bill for lying about a blow job, and what tramp did was aided and abetted with out adversary to win an election and obstructed justice and is still obstructing justice. He is a huge GD stain on the presidency.

1. Mueller said no collusion, period. So you are wrong. Keep pushing that crap and it only proves you're stupid. (your typos don't help your standing, try proof-reading posts)
2. AG Barr said that Trump is not guilty of obstruction, period, its his report. The House dems can impeach Trump with a simple majority vote, so do it!! If you're so sure tell Nancy to vote on impeachment, see where it goes. The Senate will say Trump is not guilty of obstruction, so once again, Trump is proven innocent.

Trump is innocent AND favored to win in 2020, thanks for playing.
 
Let's credit the Democrats on one thing. When they go all in on stupid, they don't stop. Now they are DEMANDING the IRS "turn over" Donald Trump's tax returns so they can go on another 2 year long scavenger hunt looking for something so they can GET HIM. Absolutely pathetic.
 
Its an incomplete report since Trump wasn’t subpoenaed. IF you’re investigating the local PTA, the first person you talk to is the head of the PTA… Trump’s lawyers got a bunch of questions they crafted answers to likely never consulting the blob for any of them. Whenever something would be incriminating, the “I don’t recall” phrase was invoked (27 times over 10 questions).

Ya got stuffed....deal with it Corn Hole
 
Its an incomplete report since Trump wasn’t subpoenaed. IF you’re investigating the local PTA, the first person you talk to is the head of the PTA… Trump’s lawyers got a bunch of questions they crafted answers to likely never consulting the blob for any of them. Whenever something would be incriminating, the “I don’t recall” phrase was invoked (27 times over 10 questions).

Ya got stuffed....deal with it Corn Hole
America got f-ed with this lame pos trump
 
While there is much within the Mueller report that suggests skepticism was well-founded, what is perhaps most probative is what the report omitted.


7 Glaring Omissions In The Mueller Report That Kill Its Credibility
April 23, 2019 ~ By Ben Weingarten
Robert Mueller’s special counsel was presented to the American public as unimpeachable. From its beginning, a distinct minority in politics and media, including several Federalist writers, were skeptical, citing the special counsel’s past prosecutorial abuses, the past alleged misconduct of its pivotal investigators, and the team’s peculiar partisan makeup.... Once in action, its seemingly limitless powers, heavy-handed usage of such powers, and more questionable if not dubious indictments, far removed from “collusion,” seemed to confirm our worst fears. While there is much within the Mueller report that further suggests this skepticism was well-founded, what is perhaps most probative is what the report omitted.
By presenting the collusion section as it did, similarly to the obstruction section, the counsel damaged the Trump administration to the greatest extent possible without affirming its criminality. It seems that Mueller pulled a Comey.... We must have a thorough investigation of the investigators. The growing cacophony of attacks on Attorney General William Barr are a testament to it.


~~~~~~
An excellent article by Ben Weingarten... Indeed, the Mueller report was just an extension of the effort to cover up what Democrats had done and to persecute Trump. Mueller used the same tactics as Comey. He left the maximum amount of innuendo in his report so that the MSM could continue to smear Trump. In essence, Robert Mueller managed a sloppy dishonest team of unethical and immoral lawyers who did not do an objective report or as close as one could come but a partisan cut and paste recasting of the facts. This is what happens when you don’t choose the best as SC, but the handiest. No, collusion isn't a crime. However, if you collude and except money from a foreign government is. The collusion is when you blame someone else for what you did? That IS a crime! And Hillary has about 146 Million from it. The Mueller "investigation" was half cover up and half coup d'état. Covering up the crimes committed by Hillary and on behalf of Hillary. Attempting to overturn the election she lost.The investigation was far more criminal than anything it pretended to look into. Now, the head of the "crime family" has issued his "report".
It's more of the same.

Turn in that cuckoo clock that you use for a brain. He was tasked with investigating Russian interference in the campaign. The Russians wanted Trump to win. The fact is that Trump and his team have or have had numerous business ties to Russia.
 
Last edited:
He is guilty of both, collusion (conspiracy) and obstruction.

I mean they got Bill for lying about a blow job, and what tramp did was aided and abetted with out adversary to win an election and obstructed justice and is still obstructing justice. He is a huge GD stain on the presidency.

1. Mueller said no collusion, period. So you are wrong. Keep pushing that crap and it only proves you're stupid. (your typos don't help your standing, try proof-reading posts)
2. AG Barr said that Trump is not guilty of obstruction, period, its his report. The House dems can impeach Trump with a simple majority vote, so do it!! If you're so sure tell Nancy to vote on impeachment, see where it goes. The Senate will say Trump is not guilty of obstruction, so once again, Trump is proven innocent.

Trump is innocent AND favored to win in 2020, thanks for playing.

1. He said no collusion in terms of the Trump campaign telling the Russians what to do. They gave the campaign strategy and polling data to a business associate with ties to Russian Intelligence and they used it as a roadmap to buy pro-Trump social media ads in those states.

2. That is Barr's determination. Mueller pointed out 10 examples where obstruction could have occurred and others where Trump ordered his subordinates to obstruct. Apparently he wants to prevent McGahn from testifying to Congress. Mueller urged Congress to investigate further. You mean the Senate will play politics with it.

Trump is not innocent and likely will not win in 2020/.
 
Its an incomplete report since Trump wasn’t subpoenaed. IF you’re investigating the local PTA, the first person you talk to is the head of the PTA… Trump’s lawyers got a bunch of questions they crafted answers to likely never consulting the blob for any of them. Whenever something would be incriminating, the “I don’t recall” phrase was invoked (27 times over 10 questions).


~~~~~~
Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don ...
Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don't Recall, Don't Know"
Dec 09, 2018 · Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don't Recall, Don't Know" ... blasts former FBI director James Comey for answering more than 200 questions at …
 
While there is much within the Mueller report that suggests skepticism was well-founded, what is perhaps most probative is what the report omitted.


7 Glaring Omissions In The Mueller Report That Kill Its Credibility
April 23, 2019 ~ By Ben Weingarten
Robert Mueller’s special counsel was presented to the American public as unimpeachable. From its beginning, a distinct minority in politics and media, including several Federalist writers, were skeptical, citing the special counsel’s past prosecutorial abuses, the past alleged misconduct of its pivotal investigators, and the team’s peculiar partisan makeup.... Once in action, its seemingly limitless powers, heavy-handed usage of such powers, and more questionable if not dubious indictments, far removed from “collusion,” seemed to confirm our worst fears. While there is much within the Mueller report that further suggests this skepticism was well-founded, what is perhaps most probative is what the report omitted.
By presenting the collusion section as it did, similarly to the obstruction section, the counsel damaged the Trump administration to the greatest extent possible without affirming its criminality. It seems that Mueller pulled a Comey.... We must have a thorough investigation of the investigators. The growing cacophony of attacks on Attorney General William Barr are a testament to it.


~~~~~~
An excellent article by Ben Weingarten... Indeed, the Mueller report was just an extension of the effort to cover up what Democrats had done and to persecute Trump. Mueller used the same tactics as Comey. He left the maximum amount of innuendo in his report so that the MSM could continue to smear Trump. In essence, Robert Mueller managed a sloppy dishonest team of unethical and immoral lawyers who did not do an objective report or as close as one could come but a partisan cut and paste recasting of the facts. This is what happens when you don’t choose the best as SC, but the handiest. No, collusion isn't a crime. However, if you collude and except money from a foreign government is. The collusion is when you blame someone else for what you did? That IS a crime! And Hillary has about 146 Million from it. The Mueller "investigation" was half cover up and half coup d'état. Covering up the crimes committed by Hillary and on behalf of Hillary. Attempting to overturn the election she lost.The investigation was far more criminal than anything it pretended to look into. Now, the head of the "crime family" has issued his "report".
It's more of the same.

Turn in that cuckoo clock that you use for a brain. He was tasked with investigating Russian interference in the campaign. The Russians wanted Trump to win. The fact is that Trump and his team have or have had numerous business ties to Russia.



~~~~~~
APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download
Robert S. Mueller III is appointed to serve as Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice. (b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James 8. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including: (i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and (ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and (iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a). (c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.

Seems to be a far cry from what you think Mueller was appointed to do.....
 
Its an incomplete report since Trump wasn’t subpoenaed. IF you’re investigating the local PTA, the first person you talk to is the head of the PTA… Trump’s lawyers got a bunch of questions they crafted answers to likely never consulting the blob for any of them. Whenever something would be incriminating, the “I don’t recall” phrase was invoked (27 times over 10 questions).


~~~~~~
Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don ...
Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don't Recall, Don't Know"
Dec 09, 2018 · Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don't Recall, Don't Know" ... blasts former FBI director James Comey for answering more than 200 questions at …

Wow…quite the allegation….too bad there is no proof.
 
He is guilty of both, collusion (conspiracy) and obstruction.

I mean they got Bill for lying about a blow job, and what tramp did was aided and abetted with out adversary to win an election and obstructed justice and is still obstructing justice. He is a huge GD stain on the presidency.
How do freaking morons like you even dress or feed yourselves properly? No matter how many times or how many ways you say it, Trump did not collude, conspire or coordinate with a foreign government of foreign government agents in order to win the 2016 election. Your obstruction dreams are going to end just like your collusion dreams. People like you, who are such poor loser,s are a huge GD stain on humanity. (Btw.. the only candidate that colluded with foreigners and obstructed justice was Hillary.
 
He is guilty of both, collusion (conspiracy) and obstruction.

I mean they got Bill for lying about a blow job, and what tramp did was aided and abetted with out adversary to win an election and obstructed justice and is still obstructing justice. He is a huge GD stain on the presidency.

1. Mueller said no collusion, period. So you are wrong. Keep pushing that crap and it only proves you're stupid. (your typos don't help your standing, try proof-reading posts)
2. AG Barr said that Trump is not guilty of obstruction, period, its his report. The House dems can impeach Trump with a simple majority vote, so do it!! If you're so sure tell Nancy to vote on impeachment, see where it goes. The Senate will say Trump is not guilty of obstruction, so once again, Trump is proven innocent.

Trump is innocent AND favored to win in 2020, thanks for playing.

What Barr says doesn't count and Mueller said nothing about collusion.

The report describes actions and events that the Special Counsel’s Office found to be supported by the evidence collected in our investigation. In some instances, the report points out the absence of evidence or conflicts in the evidence about a particular fact or event. In other instances, when substantial, credible evidence enabled the Office to reach a conclusion with confidence, the report states that the investigation established that certain actions or events occurred. A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.

In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.

Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election-Vol. 1, Page 2
 
Its an incomplete report since Trump wasn’t subpoenaed. IF you’re investigating the local PTA, the first person you talk to is the head of the PTA… Trump’s lawyers got a bunch of questions they crafted answers to likely never consulting the blob for any of them. Whenever something would be incriminating, the “I don’t recall” phrase was invoked (27 times over 10 questions).


~~~~~~
Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don ...
Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don't Recall, Don't Know"
Dec 09, 2018 · Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don't Recall, Don't Know" ... blasts former FBI director James Comey for answering more than 200 questions at …

Wow…quite the allegation….too bad there is no proof.

~~~~~~
Except someone took the trouble to count the number of times Comey uttered those words. The proof is in the records of the testimony.
 
Its an incomplete report since Trump wasn’t subpoenaed. IF you’re investigating the local PTA, the first person you talk to is the head of the PTA… Trump’s lawyers got a bunch of questions they crafted answers to likely never consulting the blob for any of them. Whenever something would be incriminating, the “I don’t recall” phrase was invoked (27 times over 10 questions).


~~~~~~
Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don ...
Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don't Recall, Don't Know"
Dec 09, 2018 · Rep. Jim Jordan: Comey Said 245 Times "Don't Remember, Don't Recall, Don't Know" ... blasts former FBI director James Comey for answering more than 200 questions at …

Wow…quite the allegation….too bad there is no proof.

~~~~~~
Except someone took the trouble to count the number of times Comey uttered those words. The proof is in the records of the testimony.

Either that or he just made it up.

Regardless, the context of Comey’s appearing before a panel for 200 questions and the blob ducking 10 questions are much different.
 
He is guilty of both, collusion (conspiracy) and obstruction.

I mean they got Bill for lying about a blow job, and what tramp did was aided and abetted with out adversary to win an election and obstructed justice and is still obstructing justice. He is a huge GD stain on the presidency.

1. Mueller said no collusion, period. So you are wrong. Keep pushing that crap and it only proves you're stupid. (your typos don't help your standing, try proof-reading posts)
2. AG Barr said that Trump is not guilty of obstruction, period, its his report. The House dems can impeach Trump with a simple majority vote, so do it!! If you're so sure tell Nancy to vote on impeachment, see where it goes. The Senate will say Trump is not guilty of obstruction, so once again, Trump is proven innocent.

Trump is innocent AND favored to win in 2020, thanks for playing.

What Barr says doesn't count and Mueller said nothing about collusion.

The report describes actions and events that the Special Counsel’s Office found to be supported by the evidence collected in our investigation. In some instances, the report points out the absence of evidence or conflicts in the evidence about a particular fact or event. In other instances, when substantial, credible evidence enabled the Office to reach a conclusion with confidence, the report states that the investigation established that certain actions or events occurred. A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.

In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.

Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election-Vol. 1, Page 2

1. The investigation and report were done for Barr. He did not have to share any of it with anyone, period. That he agreed to share the report shows that the admin was the victim of the biggest scandal in US history. The Obama admin used the intel agencies to spy on and setup the Trump campaign for the "collusion" hoax aka McCabe's and Strzok's "insurance policy". Here is proof that the Mueller report cleared Trump of any collusion, from the report:
upload_2019-4-24_11-59-37.png


What part of NO COLLUSION/CONSPIRACY, NO OBSTRUCTION don't you understand?

2. Agree, collusion is not a crime, conspiracy is a crime. Mueller found neither, so get over it. OR, go for impeachment and STFU when the Senate ignores it. There is no "there" there, please see below...

upload_2019-4-24_12-2-50.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top