7 Billionth Baby Bluster

[Unkotare]

A good article on all the propaganda and manufactered hysteria over population growth:


Come on in, the Earth Is Fine | The Weekly Standard

 

[occupied]

To someone who knows what exponential growth means in the face of increasingly limited resources, 7 billion is a truly frightening number.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Probably hatched at the Dugger Hatchery Inc.

 

[Unkotare]

To someone who knows what exponential growth means in the face of increasingly limited resources, 7 billion is a truly frightening number.

You didn't read the article, did you?

 

[occupied]

To someone who knows what exponential growth means in the face of increasingly limited resources, 7 billion is a truly frightening number.

You didn't read the article, did you?

Yes I found it to be mostly a UN hit piece.

 

[Unkotare]

To someone who knows what exponential growth means in the face of increasingly limited resources, 7 billion is a truly frightening number.

You didn't read the article, did you?

Yes I found it to be mostly a UN hit piece.

You don't seem to have read very carefully.

 

[R.C. Christian]

"MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000 IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE." R. C. Christian, March 22, 1980

 

[occupied]

You didn't read the article, did you?

Yes I found it to be mostly a UN hit piece.

You don't seem to have read very carefully.

Guess not, have a nice thread.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Over population is a very serious issue. And it really has nothing to do with global resources.
It has everything to do with economic resources, availability of jobs in the market vs. the number of employable individuals.

Over population is a local and national problem - not a global one.
There are many areas of the world where the population of people vs. the LOCAL natural resources - the population is exponentially higher than what the area resources can feed.

 

[Unkotare]

"MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000 IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE." R. C. Christian, March 22, 1980

LOL! That sure sounds practical.

 

[Unkotare]

Over population is a very serious issue. And it really has nothing to do with global resources.
It has everything to do with economic resources, availability of jobs in the market vs. the number of employable individuals.

Over population is a local and national problem - not a global one.

*sigh*

read the article

 

[Unkotare]

Yes I found it to be mostly a UN hit piece.

You don't seem to have read very carefully.

Guess not, have a nice thread.

Don't let the door hit ya on the way out...

 

[uscitizen]

A good article on all the propaganda and manufactered hysteria over population growth:


Come on in, the Earth Is Fine | The Weekly Standard

We need more people so we can drill more oil wells and raise more food!

 

[Unkotare]

A good article on all the propaganda and manufactered hysteria over population growth:


Come on in, the Earth Is Fine | The Weekly Standard

We need more people so we can drill more oil wells and raise more food!

Whenever you're ready to make a point, feel free.

 

[JoeB131]

To someone who knows what exponential growth means in the face of increasingly limited resources, 7 billion is a truly frightening number.

You didn't read the article, did you?

This is the same Weekly Standard that insisted the Iraq War was a nifty idea long after everyone with a lick of sense realized it wasn't.

 

[uscitizen]

A good article on all the propaganda and manufactered hysteria over population growth:


Come on in, the Earth Is Fine | The Weekly Standard

We need more people so we can drill more oil wells and raise more food!

Whenever you're ready to make a point, feel free.

Point made, you missed it.
sorry....

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Over population is a very serious issue. And it really has nothing to do with global resources.
It has everything to do with economic resources, availability of jobs in the market vs. the number of employable individuals.

Over population is a local and national problem - not a global one.

*sigh*

read the article

I scanned over most of it...it isn't a very good article.
I stand by my points.
Over-population is a local problem...not a global one.
You go down to South America - where inexplicably they keep right on producing scores of children even though the family doesn't have the means to barely feed themselves, and the geography where they live - cannot sustain HALF the population.
Indeed - starvation today almost always is because of a grossly over populated region that cannot support the number of people in the area.
The world is not over populated. But areas of the world inarguably are.

 

[uscitizen]

You go down to any big city in America - where inexplicably they keep right on producing scores of children even though the family doesn't have the means to barely feed themselves, and the geography where they live - cannot sustain HALF the population.

Apologies for the edit.


Social programs like welfare and such have helped keep big cities from falling apart. And federal dollars and such have encouraged their continuing growth.

How wil big cities survive in a smaller government future? Or will they keep getting the bennies while individial assistance is reduced or cut off?

An interesting future coming up.

 

[Unkotare]

To someone who knows what exponential growth means in the face of increasingly limited resources, 7 billion is a truly frightening number.

You didn't read the article, did you?

This is the same Weekly Standard that insisted the Iraq War was a nifty idea long after everyone with a lick of sense realized it wasn't.

Anything to add other than logical fallacies, bigot?

 

[Unkotare]

You go down to any big city in America - where inexplicably they keep right on producing scores of children even though the family doesn't have the means to barely feed themselves, and the geography where they live - cannot sustain HALF the population.

Apologies for the edit.


Social programs like welfare and such have helped keep big cities from falling apart. And federal dollars and such have encouraged their continuing growth.

How wil big cities survive in a smaller government future? Or will they keep getting the bennies while individial assistance is reduced or cut off?

An interesting future coming up.

Poor people not having enough abortions for ya?