63% of Republicans STILL Think Iraq Had WMDs

this is why seriously participating in a discussion on boards like this is futile.

they NEEEEED to believe that Iraq had WMDs.

and use old chemical weapons, which were found, as a crutch to rationalize that the invasion of iraq was not built on a full-blown lie.

the leaders of a third world country invading another third world country on those grounds would now sit in Scheveningen.

so dems lied...bush lied, the cia lied, most world leaders lied...

:eusa_hand:


fuck yeah.

the wmd were transported to syria.
 
this is why seriously participating in a discussion on boards like this is futile.

they NEEEEED to believe that Iraq had WMDs.

and use old chemical weapons, which were found, as a crutch to rationalize that the invasion of iraq was not built on a full-blown lie.

the leaders of a third world country invading another third world country on those grounds would now sit in Scheveningen.

And yet, with all of YOUR knowledge, the democrats also voted for the invasion.

and this crutch has been used as well so many times that i will not address this again.

what's next.

the old quotes from pre 2001?

it is okay, meister.

USA #1

fuck yeah.

You can call it whatever you want LK, (crutch, potato, truth), but the facts do bite, don't they? :D
 
63% of Republicans STILL Think Iraq Had WMDs

Go ahead, pick out your source. This is how "Google" works.

Remember, 70% of Americans believed Iraq was involved in 9/11:

Bush linked Iraq and the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks: "The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001 -- and still goes on. That terrible morning, 19 evil men -- the shock troops of a hateful ideology -- gave America and the civilized world a glimpse of their ambitions."

washingtonpost.com: Hussein Link to 9/11 Lingers in Many Minds

How public opinion was shaped:

https://sgadaria.expressions.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Iraq-article_Gershkoff_Kushner.pdf

Oh, and 64% of Republicans believe Obama was born in another country.

The Poll:

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~benv/files/poll responses by party ID.pdf

The part on Demographics is hilarious. 2.5% of blacks are Republican? More than half Republicans say they are strongly religious but less than a quarter regularly attend church.

Very interesting poll.

500 tons of uranium shipped from Iraq, Pentagon says
500 tons of uranium shipped from Iraq, Pentagon says - CNN
 
63% of Republicans don’t believe former republican president George W. Bush? Shameful.

Bush, Cheney admit Iraq had no WMD, take new tack

By Scott Lindlaw
ASSOCIATED PRESS

October 8, 2004

WASHINGTON – President Bush and his vice president conceded yesterday in the clearest terms yet that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, trying to shift the Iraq war debate to a new issue – whether the invasion was justified because Hussein was abusing a U.N. oil-for-food program.

Bush's response was his first reaction to a report released Wednesday by Charles Duelfer, the CIA's top weapons inspector, that contradicted the White House's main argument for invading Iraq.

Bush, Cheney admit Iraq had no WMD, take new tack | The San Diego Union-Tribune
 
And yet, with all of YOUR knowledge, the democrats also voted for the invasion.

and this crutch has been used as well so many times that i will not address this again.

what's next.

the old quotes from pre 2001?

it is okay, meister.

USA #1

fuck yeah.

You can call it whatever you want LK, (crutch, potato, truth), but the facts do bite, don't they? :D


they mainly bit iraqis, and the us military.

totally like funny and shit.

hey, and they bit your budget.


hahahahahaha
 
Last edited:
They did you cock sucking hack.

I fully supported the invasion then and now. Did we handle the invasion wrong? You bet your ass but it was still the right thing to do. Fucking Saddam and Rderp

WHY? Saddam was not a threat. Just President of Iran. Saddam was really an ally because there were no terrorist in Iraq before our invasion. How can an invasion be done wrong? :eusa_hand::confused:
He violated the terms of the gulf war cease fire 19 fucking times. We promised to hold him to those terms. One or two violations ok. 19? At that point our credibility became the issue not his.
 
500 tons of uranium shipped from Iraq, Pentagon says - CNN
since this was actually ignored I'll try again -
The United States secretly shipped out of Iraq more than 500 tons of low-grade uranium dating back to the Saddam Hussein era, the Pentagon said Monday.

The U.S. military spent $70 million ensuring the safe transportation of 550 metric tons of the uranium from Iraq to Canada, said Pentagon spokesman Brian Whitman.

The shipment, which until recently was kept secret, involved a U.S. truck convoy, 37 cargo flights out of Baghdad to a transitional location, and then a transoceanic voyage on board a U.S.-government-owned ship designed to carry troops to a war zone, he said.
500 tons of uranium shipped from Iraq, Pentagon says - CNN
 
500 tons of uranium shipped from Iraq, Pentagon says - CNN
since this was actually ignored I'll try again -
The United States secretly shipped out of Iraq more than 500 tons of low-grade uranium dating back to the Saddam Hussein era, the Pentagon said Monday.

The U.S. military spent $70 million ensuring the safe transportation of 550 metric tons of the uranium from Iraq to Canada, said Pentagon spokesman Brian Whitman.

The shipment, which until recently was kept secret, involved a U.S. truck convoy, 37 cargo flights out of Baghdad to a transitional location, and then a transoceanic voyage on board a U.S.-government-owned ship designed to carry troops to a war zone, he said.
500 tons of uranium shipped from Iraq, Pentagon says - CNN

They tend to ignore facts. :eusa_whistle:
 
lol, low grade uranium.

why do you think iran wants centrifuges?

it is like you know fucking hard to get this pesky uranium off its lazy ass to become weapon grade uranium.

remember the mushroom cloud speeches?


boo


hey, didn't saddam like you know totally buy yellowcake in niger.

ask colin powell.
 
They did you cock sucking hack.

I fully supported the invasion then and now. Did we handle the invasion wrong? You bet your ass but it was still the right thing to do. Fucking Saddam and Rderp

WHY? Saddam was not a threat. Just President of Iran. Saddam was really an ally because there were no terrorist in Iraq before our invasion. How can an invasion be done wrong? :eusa_hand::confused:
He violated the terms of the gulf war cease fire 19 fucking times. We promised to hold him to those terms. One or two violations ok. 19? At that point our credibility became the issue not his.

this ^ should shut up LK and rdean.


fat chence of that
 
this is why seriously participating in a discussion on boards like this is futile.

they NEEEEED to believe that Iraq had WMDs.

and use old chemical weapons, which were found, as a crutch to rationalize that the invasion of iraq was not built on a full-blown lie.

the leaders of a third world country invading another third world country on those grounds would now sit in Scheveningen.

And yet, with all of YOUR knowledge, the democrats also voted for the invasion.

and this crutch has been used as well so many times that i will not address this again.

what's next.

the old quotes from pre 2001?

it is okay, meister.

USA #1

fuck yeah.

And the quotes 2001 and beyond? Mean anything?


"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Democrat Quotes on WMD
 
let's recap.

the US tries to sell the iraq invasion via colin powell with yellowcake and mushroom clouds and anthrax.

no sell.


they do it anyway, with allies like palau.

they find old chemical weapons (from walmart)

and then secretly move the uranium they found to canada.


yeah, that's the ticket.
 
WHY? Saddam was not a threat. Just President of Iran. Saddam was really an ally because there were no terrorist in Iraq before our invasion. How can an invasion be done wrong? :eusa_hand::confused:
He violated the terms of the gulf war cease fire 19 fucking times. We promised to hold him to those terms. One or two violations ok. 19? At that point our credibility became the issue not his.

this ^ should shut up LK and rdean.


fat chence of that


trie ageen in engrish.
 

Forum List

Back
Top