6 dead in shooting in Germany......er....gun control? But...But...gun control?

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,895
52,168
2,290
This likely won't be considered a mass public shooting since it seems, at first glance, to be a family murder. But........er.......Germany is in Europe....and, um......we are constantly told that shootings like this can't happen in Europe cause....gun control?

Six dead in shooting in German town

Six people have been killed and others wounded in a shooting in the south-west German town of Rot am See, officials say.

A male suspect was arrested after the attack, which happened in a building close to the railway station.

Police in the state of Baden-Württemberg say initial indications suggested the suspect and the victims knew each other.

There is no evidence that anyone else is involved in the shooting, they say.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.


And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.


And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

Please provide quote(s) where I have ever said I oppose guns, or the right of Americans to own guns. I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.


And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

Please provide quote(s) where I have ever said I oppose guns, or the right of Americans to own guns. I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

When your regulations, bans and taxe, fees keep normal people from being able to afford guns and limit their access based on your feelings about guns, that is an infringement.....

When democrats kept Blacks from sitting at lunch counters or using the same bathrooms as white democrats, that was an infringement......they didn't get to say who could use the bathrooms, what kind of seating was available for blacks......those regulations were an infringement...
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.


And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

Please provide quote(s) where I have ever said I oppose guns, or the right of Americans to own guns. I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

When your regulations, bans and taxe, fees keep normal people from being able to afford guns and limit their access based on your feelings about guns, that is an infringement.....

When democrats kept Blacks from sitting at lunch counters or using the same bathrooms as white democrats, that was an infringement......they didn't get to say who could use the bathrooms, what kind of seating was available for blacks......those regulations were an infringement...

The Supreme Court said banning blacks from a lunch counter was infringing their rights, but regulating gun is not. Only an idiot would try to say those were the same thing, or perhaps a childish, crazy gun nut.
 
I don't feel sorry for Globalist Germany.....I don't feel sorry for Globalist Sweden.....in fact I don't feel sorry for any Western European country who has decided to embrace Globlalism.

Their globalists politicians know exactly what they are doing.

Hope European Patriots and all citizens wake up before is too late.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.


And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

Still waiting on that quote. You find it yet?
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.
The US gun homicide rate per 100,000: 4.5 (that's four point five).
The Honduras gun homicide rate per 100,000, where there is "strict" gun control: 60.
As a matter of fact, pick your Central American nation and they don't hold up as well.
Number of private American citizens who own guns and never commit crimes with them: 90+ MILLION.
We don't bother you...ever. Don't bother us.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.
The US gun homicide rate per 100,000: 4.5 (that's four point five).
The Honduras gun homicide rate per 100,000, where there is "strict" gun control: 60.
As a matter of fact, pick your Central American nation and they don't hold up as well.
Number of private American citizens who own guns and never commit crimes with them: 90+ MILLION.
We don't bother you...ever. Don't bother us.

This isn't Honduras, dumb ass.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.
The US gun homicide rate per 100,000: 4.5 (that's four point five).
The Honduras gun homicide rate per 100,000, where there is "strict" gun control: 60.
As a matter of fact, pick your Central American nation and they don't hold up as well.
Number of private American citizens who own guns and never commit crimes with them: 90+ MILLION.
We don't bother you...ever. Don't bother us.

This isn't Honduras, dumb ass.
Another individual who likes to insult people he disagrees with. Poor thing.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.


And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...
They won't be ABLE to explain ANY of this. At least NOT in an intelligent or coherent manner.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.


And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

Please provide quote(s) where I have ever said I oppose guns, or the right of Americans to own guns. I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

When your regulations, bans and taxe, fees keep normal people from being able to afford guns and limit their access based on your feelings about guns, that is an infringement.....

When democrats kept Blacks from sitting at lunch counters or using the same bathrooms as white democrats, that was an infringement......they didn't get to say who could use the bathrooms, what kind of seating was available for blacks......those regulations were an infringement...

The Supreme Court said banning blacks from a lunch counter was infringing their rights, but regulating gun is not. Only an idiot would try to say those were the same thing, or perhaps a childish, crazy gun nut.


Both are an infringement on Rights...you doofus. The Right to keep and Bear arms is a Right just like all the others...no less than the others.......only an idiot would attack one Right thinking that makes the other rights more secure.
 
Only six, and it is a really big thing. We have more than that many every day. We should do what they are doing.


And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

Please provide quote(s) where I have ever said I oppose guns, or the right of Americans to own guns. I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

When your regulations, bans and taxe, fees keep normal people from being able to afford guns and limit their access based on your feelings about guns, that is an infringement.....

When democrats kept Blacks from sitting at lunch counters or using the same bathrooms as white democrats, that was an infringement......they didn't get to say who could use the bathrooms, what kind of seating was available for blacks......those regulations were an infringement...

The Supreme Court said banning blacks from a lunch counter was infringing their rights, but regulating gun is not. Only an idiot would try to say those were the same thing, or perhaps a childish, crazy gun nut.


Both are an infringement on Rights...you doofus. The Right to keep and Bear arms is a Right just like all the others...no less than the others.......only an idiot would attack one Right thinking that makes the other rights more secure.

You should go tell that to the Supreme Court. They disagree with you.
 
And if their people wanted to do it more, they would do it more....culture, not guns, is the issue.....

And please explain the following...and answer the questions...

n the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns, but now carry them for self defense, our gun murder rate went down 49%...

With what you believe....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own but now carry guns our gun crime rate went down 75%....

With what you believe,.....how do you explain that?

In the U.S. as more Americans not only own guns but carry them for self defense, our violent crime rate went down 72%.....

With what you believe, how do you explain that?

Nothing you believe about guns is supported by actual facts, the truth, or reality on the ground......how do you justify your believes beyond simply not liking guns?

------
Over the last 27 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 18.6 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.

The anti-gun hypothesis and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.



Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

Please provide quote(s) where I have ever said I oppose guns, or the right of Americans to own guns. I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

When your regulations, bans and taxe, fees keep normal people from being able to afford guns and limit their access based on your feelings about guns, that is an infringement.....

When democrats kept Blacks from sitting at lunch counters or using the same bathrooms as white democrats, that was an infringement......they didn't get to say who could use the bathrooms, what kind of seating was available for blacks......those regulations were an infringement...

The Supreme Court said banning blacks from a lunch counter was infringing their rights, but regulating gun is not. Only an idiot would try to say those were the same thing, or perhaps a childish, crazy gun nut.


Both are an infringement on Rights...you doofus. The Right to keep and Bear arms is a Right just like all the others...no less than the others.......only an idiot would attack one Right thinking that makes the other rights more secure.

You should go tell that to the Supreme Court. They disagree with you.


You didn't read Heller, Miller, Caetano, or any of the other rulings.....you should do that before you post....
 
Please provide quote(s) where I have ever said I oppose guns, or the right of Americans to own guns. I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

When your regulations, bans and taxe, fees keep normal people from being able to afford guns and limit their access based on your feelings about guns, that is an infringement.....

When democrats kept Blacks from sitting at lunch counters or using the same bathrooms as white democrats, that was an infringement......they didn't get to say who could use the bathrooms, what kind of seating was available for blacks......those regulations were an infringement...

The Supreme Court said banning blacks from a lunch counter was infringing their rights, but regulating gun is not. Only an idiot would try to say those were the same thing, or perhaps a childish, crazy gun nut.


Both are an infringement on Rights...you doofus. The Right to keep and Bear arms is a Right just like all the others...no less than the others.......only an idiot would attack one Right thinking that makes the other rights more secure.

You should go tell that to the Supreme Court. They disagree with you.


You didn't read Heller, Miller, Caetano, or any of the other rulings.....you should do that before you post....

Which part of any of those say that regulation is infringement?
 
I often advocate reasonable regulation of who can purchase them, and types of guns available, but regulation is not infringement.

When your regulations, bans and taxe, fees keep normal people from being able to afford guns and limit their access based on your feelings about guns, that is an infringement.....

When democrats kept Blacks from sitting at lunch counters or using the same bathrooms as white democrats, that was an infringement......they didn't get to say who could use the bathrooms, what kind of seating was available for blacks......those regulations were an infringement...

The Supreme Court said banning blacks from a lunch counter was infringing their rights, but regulating gun is not. Only an idiot would try to say those were the same thing, or perhaps a childish, crazy gun nut.


Both are an infringement on Rights...you doofus. The Right to keep and Bear arms is a Right just like all the others...no less than the others.......only an idiot would attack one Right thinking that makes the other rights more secure.

You should go tell that to the Supreme Court. They disagree with you.


You didn't read Heller, Miller, Caetano, or any of the other rulings.....you should do that before you post....

Which part of any of those say that regulation is infringement?

All of them. A Right delayed is a Right denied.......
 

Forum List

Back
Top