get_involved
Gold Member
- Jul 16, 2009
- 2,046
- 430
- 130
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
how is this "anti-constitutional"?More Anti-American Anti-Constitutional Nativist crapola.
More Anti-American Anti-Constitutional Nativist crapola.
More Anti-American Anti-Constitutional Nativist crapola.
You are a Paid or Unpaid Propagandist???
still waiting for an answer to this^^^^how is this "anti-constitutional"?More Anti-American Anti-Constitutional Nativist crapola.
how is this "anti-constitutional"?More Anti-American Anti-Constitutional Nativist crapola.
no, it does nothow is this "anti-constitutional"?More Anti-American Anti-Constitutional Nativist crapola.
Because it attempts to change the meaning of the Constitution without amending it.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
How can you "interpret" that differently?
57 Co-Sponsors of Birthright Citizenship Act
no, it does nothow is this "anti-constitutional"?
Because it attempts to change the meaning of the Constitution without amending it.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
How can you "interpret" that differently?
it is using the constitution where it gives congress the right to define it by statute
further more, if an illegal alien is suject to the jurisdiction of their home country, they are not under ours
thats how they can be deported
no, it is notno, it does notBecause it attempts to change the meaning of the Constitution without amending it.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
How can you "interpret" that differently?
it is using the constitution where it gives congress the right to define it by statute
further more, if an illegal alien is suject to the jurisdiction of their home country, they are not under ours
thats how they can be deported
You realize that that's the same bullshit reasoning that some on the left to use for Gun Control, right?
If the Constitution says, very clearly, that everyone born in the US is a citizen, passing a law that changed that would be as unconstitutional as banning guns.
as for your "further more": A child born in the US is subject to the jurisdiction of the country they were born in, not their parent's home country.
Area 51I am from Beta Triangula 6. Where would they deport me to?
How so? I've literally heard the same argument, word for word.no, it is notno, it does not
it is using the constitution where it gives congress the right to define it by statute
further more, if an illegal alien is suject to the jurisdiction of their home country, they are not under ours
thats how they can be deported
You realize that that's the same bullshit reasoning that some on the left to use for Gun Control, right?
If the Constitution says, very clearly, that everyone born in the US is a citizen, passing a law that changed that would be as unconstitutional as banning guns.
as for your "further more": A child born in the US is subject to the jurisdiction of the country they were born in, not their parent's home country.
gun control is a totally different thing
and the child is subject to the parents
and the constitution gives the congress the right to define it