55% small business owners would not open their business today, BHO is why

I've said it a dozen times, even before this op; nobody is going to hire until zero is out of office. Fuel skyrocketing, 21 new taxes, thousands of new regulations.
If barry keeps pushing the envelope beyond this there can't help but be civil unrest.
 
I've said it a dozen times, even before this op; nobody is going to hire until zero is out of office. Fuel skyrocketing, 21 new taxes, thousands of new regulations.
If barry keeps pushing the envelope beyond this there can't help but be civil unrest.

It is that simple. I am not sure we will ever be the same as we once where
That is sad
 
I've said it a dozen times, even before this op; nobody is going to hire until zero is out of office. Fuel skyrocketing, 21 new taxes, thousands of new regulations.
If barry keeps pushing the envelope beyond this there can't help but be civil unrest.

really? why do the new private sector job numbers, even though they're not as high as we'd all like, stay in the positive if "no one is going to hire"?

Your last sentence....There's a thread entitled something like " will there be riots if Obama loses"...seems as though we could ask the same if he's re-elected.
 
I'll tell you what JRK.....I do agree that we need to promote small businesses as.much as possible.....and those tools are available in the jobs bill that the House keeps fucking with so that Obama doesn't get another "win" in an election year.

Such is the patriotism and jobs priority of the right.
 
I've said it a dozen times, even before this op; nobody is going to hire until zero is out of office. Fuel skyrocketing, 21 new taxes, thousands of new regulations.
If barry keeps pushing the envelope beyond this there can't help but be civil unrest.

really? why do the new private sector job numbers, even though they're not as high as we'd all like, stay in the positive if "no one is going to hire"?

Your last sentence....There's a thread entitled something like " will there be riots if Obama loses"...seems as though we could ask the same if he's re-elected.

Steel where are just getting back to 08 numbers
that is not hiring
that is not growth
That is status quo

We created 7 million jobs from 03-07
we have created about 200,000 from 09 till present while millions have left the work force during the same time
 
I've said it a dozen times, even before this op; nobody is going to hire until zero is out of office. Fuel skyrocketing, 21 new taxes, thousands of new regulations.
If barry keeps pushing the envelope beyond this there can't help but be civil unrest.

really? why do the new private sector job numbers, even though they're not as high as we'd all like, stay in the positive if "no one is going to hire"?

Your last sentence....There's a thread entitled something like " will there be riots if Obama loses"...seems as though we could ask the same if he's re-elected.

Steel where are just getting back to 08 numbers
that is not hiring
that is not growth
That is status quo

We created 7 million jobs from 03-07
we have created about 200,000 from 09 till present while millions have left the work force during the same time

7 million jobs from 03-07?
Where? In China?
 
Yep, so the expansion in smalls is anemic, maybe because the economy is such a disaster, wonder why, couldn't be because of lack of consumer confidence and diminished opportunity, could it?

I guess we now get to experience what the new standard of living is all about first hand.
 
really? why do the new private sector job numbers, even though they're not as high as we'd all like, stay in the positive if "no one is going to hire"?

Your last sentence....There's a thread entitled something like " will there be riots if Obama loses"...seems as though we could ask the same if he's re-elected.

Steel where are just getting back to 08 numbers
that is not hiring
that is not growth
That is status quo

We created 7 million jobs from 03-07
we have created about 200,000 from 09 till present while millions have left the work force during the same time

7 million jobs from 03-07?
Where? In China?

yeah....how about a unbiased link.to back up your numbers.
 
I just posted jobs numbers from the dept of labor a couple of days ago.
Yep biased.
We have not created 7 million jobs since 3-07.
 
really? why do the new private sector job numbers, even though they're not as high as we'd all like, stay in the positive if "no one is going to hire"?

Your last sentence....There's a thread entitled something like " will there be riots if Obama loses"...seems as though we could ask the same if he's re-elected.

Steel where are just getting back to 08 numbers
that is not hiring
that is not growth
That is status quo

We created 7 million jobs from 03-07
we have created about 200,000 from 09 till present while millions have left the work force during the same time

7 million jobs from 03-07?
Where? In China?

All you are likely to hear about low tax rates from liberals and their echo chamber in the media is that they don’t work—that they fail to gin up economic or job growth. Exhibit A for this preposterous proposition is the Bush tax cuts. The left wants you to accept it as conventional wisdom that the policy was a bust.
Don’t believe it. The tax cuts enacted by the U.S. Congress in 2003 were an important cause of an economic expansion that roared for some 50 months and created 8.1 million jobs. The opposite philosophy—a stimulus that has crowded out private investment, plus an enormous health bill and a nightmarish financial regulatory package that are killing job creation—has only delayed recovery and left us with 9.1% unemployment.

Morning Bell: The Truth About Tax Cuts

The WSJ link here-in states 7 million
 
Steel where are just getting back to 08 numbers
that is not hiring
that is not growth
That is status quo

We created 7 million jobs from 03-07
we have created about 200,000 from 09 till present while millions have left the work force during the same time

7 million jobs from 03-07?
Where? In China?

yeah....how about a unbiased link.to back up your numbers.

By 2003, Mr. Bush grasped this lesson. In that year, he cut the dividend and capital gains rates to 15 percent each, and the economy responded. In two years, stocks rose 20 percent. In three years, $15 trillion of new wealth was created. The U.S. economy added 8 million new jobs from mid-2003 to early 2007, and the median household increased its wealth by $20,000 in real terms.

Read more: DWYER: Bush tax cuts boosted federal revenue - Washington Times DWYER: Bush tax cuts boosted federal revenue - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
 
"W" did have positive job growth of around 8 million jobs created from 2003-2007, not quite Clinton or Reagan numbers, but it was pretty good. During that same time period 1.2 jobs were outsourced offshore. Well, in the end "W" ended up with a negative job growth of - 563,000 jobs. Now if one takes the number of jobs shipped to other countries and say those jobs stayed in the US, Bush may have ended up with positive job growth.
The bottomline is that the job creators didn't do their job of creating jobs domestically after the record drop in the Capital Gains Tax Rate and they still aren't doing the job. They say Obama isn't business friendly, is that the same case for Bush?
Presidents don't create jobs, job creators crate jobs and with their tax cut, they decided to keep the employee census down because it helps the bottoline, they are doing it now under Obama.
Bush didn't fail creating jobs, the God-like job creators create jobs and they didn't do what the tax cut was suppose to drive them to do, create jobs.
 
About a net of 3 million jobs were created under the Bush presidency.

Here's the net job growth by President:

Jobs Created in Thousands President Political Party
6,551 Franklin D. Roosevelt Democrat
8,752 Harry S. Truman Democrat
1,555 Dwight D. Eisenhower Republican
2,728 John F. Kennedy Democrat
8,892 Lyndon B. Johnson Democrat
5,255 Richard Nixon Republican
2,234 Gerald Ford Republican
8,592 Jimmy Carter Democrat
13,594 Ronald Reagan Republican
1,042 George H. W. Bush Republican
19,495 Bill Clinton Democrat
-563 George W. Bush Republican
-871 Barack Obama Democrat
 
From that liberal Rag the WSJ:

His job-creation record won’t look much better. The Bush administration created about three million jobs (net) over its eight years, a fraction of the 23 million jobs created under President Bill Clinton‘s administration and only slightly better than President George H.W. Bush did in his four years in office.

Bush On Jobs: The Worst Track Record On Record - Real Time Economics - WSJ
 
About a net of 3 million jobs were created under the Bush presidency.

Here's the net job growth by President:

Jobs Created in Thousands President Political Party
6,551 Franklin D. Roosevelt Democrat
8,752 Harry S. Truman Democrat
1,555 Dwight D. Eisenhower Republican
2,728 John F. Kennedy Democrat
8,892 Lyndon B. Johnson Democrat
5,255 Richard Nixon Republican
2,234 Gerald Ford Republican
8,592 Jimmy Carter Democrat
13,594 Ronald Reagan Republican
1,042 George H. W. Bush Republican
19,495 Bill Clinton Democrat
-563 George W. Bush Republican
-871 Barack Obama Democrat

Yep it varies a bit but the high somewhat reliable source is 3 million not 8 or so like the right wing whack job claims.
 

Forum List

Back
Top