55 MPH Speed Limit

Orange_Juice

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2008
1,038
57
48
You will slow down!


Would You Drive 55? - Yahoo! News



ADVERTISEMENT

Senator John Warner (R-VA) - elected in 1978 - recently expressed interest in the idea of a national speed limit to conserve gasoline. Warner, who is not running for re-election this year, wrote to U.S. Secretary of Energy Sam Bodman, asking "at what speed is the typical vehicle traveling on America's highways today most fuel efficient?"


Warner told TIME his concern is for "the many millions and millions [of Americans] of limited means, sitting around their kitchen table trying to figure out how to make ends meet." Unlike long-term alternative energy sources, Warner says, a speed limit would work to bring down gas prices immediately. "Maybe some guy's got a better idea," he says. "But I haven't seen it."


The National Maximum Speed Limit of 55 mph was created in 1974, when Richard Nixon signed the Emergency Energy Highway Conservation Act. Prior to that, states had been free to set their own speed limits, but the new law threatened to strip Federal highway funding from any state straying above the national standard. The ostensible purpose of this limit was to keep down gas prices, which had been driven through the roof by an OPEC embargo touched off by the 1973 Arab-Israeli war. And with gas-prices once again sky-high, Warner isn't alone in talking up a cap on speeding.


Jackie Speier, a first-term Democratic congresswoman from California, is already on the case. Earlier this month, she introduced a bill that would cap highway speed limits at 60 mph - 65 in rural areas. It's currently awaiting a hearing before the House Committee on Transportation. Warner says he hasn't contacted Speier, but adds that he'd be willing to "stroll out on the floor" in favor of a speed-limit bill. He has yet to propose a similar bill in the Senate.
 
Yeah, if people traveled at 55 on highways it would bring them enormous gas savings, to be sure.

Try and get people to do it though.

Trying to travel at 55 on most highways now is apt to get you rear ended.
 
stupid liberals telling people how to drive and forcing them to conserve gas.

wait...
 
Yeah, if people traveled at 55 on highways it would bring them enormous gas savings, to be sure.

Try and get people to do it though.

Trying to travel at 55 on most highways now is apt to get you rear ended.

Write tickets, the people will obey the law once they get bitten
 
You will slow down!


Would You Drive 55? - Yahoo! News



ADVERTISEMENT

Senator John Warner (R-VA) - elected in 1978 - recently expressed interest in the idea of a national speed limit to conserve gasoline. Warner, who is not running for re-election this year, wrote to U.S. Secretary of Energy Sam Bodman, asking "at what speed is the typical vehicle traveling on America's highways today most fuel efficient?"


Warner told TIME his concern is for "the many millions and millions [of Americans] of limited means, sitting around their kitchen table trying to figure out how to make ends meet." Unlike long-term alternative energy sources, Warner says, a speed limit would work to bring down gas prices immediately. "Maybe some guy's got a better idea," he says. "But I haven't seen it."


The National Maximum Speed Limit of 55 mph was created in 1974, when Richard Nixon signed the Emergency Energy Highway Conservation Act. Prior to that, states had been free to set their own speed limits, but the new law threatened to strip Federal highway funding from any state straying above the national standard. The ostensible purpose of this limit was to keep down gas prices, which had been driven through the roof by an OPEC embargo touched off by the 1973 Arab-Israeli war. And with gas-prices once again sky-high, Warner isn't alone in talking up a cap on speeding.


Jackie Speier, a first-term Democratic congresswoman from California, is already on the case. Earlier this month, she introduced a bill that would cap highway speed limits at 60 mph - 65 in rural areas. It's currently awaiting a hearing before the House Committee on Transportation. Warner says he hasn't contacted Speier, but adds that he'd be willing to "stroll out on the floor" in favor of a speed-limit bill. He has yet to propose a similar bill in the Senate.

Bullshit---it's a sneaky for the government to extort money from who it thinks are energy wasters. Are we going to have the energy cops cruising around measuring our carbon footprints ?
 
The maximum speed limit on most California highways is 65 mph. 70 mph where posted.

In Los Angeles the speed limit is 5 mph because it is a just one big parking lot. So slowing down to 55 is not going to do much, there where the biggest majority of cars are located.

What city in California has the most smog? Los Angeles! All those cars sitting at idle or near idle - causing it? Yep! I think so. :cuckoo:
 
The maximum speed limit on most California highways is 65 mph. 70 mph where posted.

In Los Angeles the speed limit is 5 mph because it is a just one big parking lot. So slowing down to 55 is not going to do much, there where the biggest majority of cars are located.

What city in California has the most smog? Los Angeles! All those cars sitting at idle or near idle - causing it? Yep! I think so. :cuckoo:

Ticket em all for wasting energy. Your mileage sucks when you sit at idle. :D
 
Ignoring the fact that it will reduce overall oil consuption just because you don't like that fact doesn't change the fact that it will.

And the people will actually reduce their speed from 72 MPH to 62 MPH
 
Stupid. Instead of thinking of ways to preserve our ostentatious motoring society, how about investing in light rail, and other things that could actually make a difference? Oh no, public transit is too European, there's no way that'll fly in America.
 
Stupid. Instead of thinking of ways to preserve our ostentatious motoring society, how about investing in light rail, and other things that could actually make a difference? Oh no, public transit is too European, there's no way that'll fly in America.

Amen Brother! I wish this could really get implemented here in the Midwest:


High Speed Rail Train 1 There are many organizations - private, public, and non-profit - who are advocating a Midwest high speed rail system. This system, with its hub in Chicago, would eventually extend to 11 Midwestern states. Indiana would benefit from having three lines cross the state, while Indianapolis would have direct connections to Chicago, Cincinnati, and Louisville. It is estimated that the new routes will cut travel time in half when compared to existing rail service.



Midwest High Speed Rail Coalition

The Midwest High Speed Rail Coalition is a membership-based non-profit organization promoting the development of better, faster, more frequent intercity passenger rail service in nine Midwestern states - Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
The mission of the organization is to educate business leaders, elected officials, and the public about the benefits of an advanced passenger rail network for the Midwest.

For more information about the Midwest High Speed Rail Coalition, visit their web site at Midwest High Speed Rail Association




http://imaps.indygov.org/ed_portal/template.asp?page=trans_hsrail
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top