53 Republicans are now on a hit list

RodISHI

Platinum Member
Nov 29, 2008
25,786
11,295
940
I can see it now 53 Republics are now on the hit list of the radical Leftwingnuts.
October 15, 2009

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President,

We respectfully request that you remove Kevin Jennings, the Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools, from your Administration. It is clear that Mr. Jennings lacks the appropriate qualifications and ethical standards to serve in this capacity.

As the founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Mr. Jennings has played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools—an agenda that runs counter to the values that many parents desire to instill in their children. As evidence of this, Mr. Jennings wrote the foreword for a book titled Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue About Sexualities and Schooling. Throughout his career, Mr. Jennings has made it his mission to establish special protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered students to the exclusion of all other students. The totality of Mr. Jennings’ career has been to advocate for public affirmation of homosexuality. There is more to safe and drug free schools than can be accomplished from the narrow view of Mr. Jennings who has, for more than 20 years, almost exclusively focused on promoting the homosexual agenda.

Equally troubling is Mr. Jennings’ self-described history of ignoring the sexual abuse of a child. In his book, One Teacher in Ten, Mr. Jennings recounts a 15-year old student confiding in him that he had a sexual relationship with a much older man. Mr. Jennings’ only response was to ask if the underage boy used a condom. As a mandatory reporter, Mr. Jennings was required by law to report child abuse, including sex crimes. Mr. Jennings cannot serve as the “safe schools” czar when his record demonstrates a willingness to overlook the sexual abuse of a child.

As the “safe schools” czar, Mr. Jennings is also charged with ensuring our schools and students are drug free. It is clear that Mr. Jennings is unfit to serve in this capacity, as well. His own history of unrepentant drug and alcohol abuse indicates that he is of the opinion that getting drunk and high as a young person is acceptable. In his memoir, Mama’s Boy, Preacher’s Son, Mr. Jennings describes his use of illegal drugs, without expressing regret or acknowledging the devastating effects illegal drug use can have on a person’s life.

Everyone that deals with the education of the most vulnerable must be a positive role model. Our children are not blessed with the wisdom to discern and reject. Children presume the adults who educate them are approved by the larger society and their parents. Kevin Jennings cannot gain the approval of parents who want their children safe and their schools drug free. You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.

Given these very serious issues with Mr. Jennings’ record, we urge you to remove him immediately.

Sincerely,

KING
Alexander
Aderholt
Akin
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Bartlett
Barton
Boozman
Broun
Brown, H.
Carter
Chaffetz
Coffman
Cole
Conaway
Davis, Geoff
Fallin
Fleming
Foxx
Franks
Garrett
Gingrey
Gohmert
Hunter
Issa
Jordan
Lamborn
Latta
LuetkemeyerMarchant
McClintock
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris
Mica
Miller, J.
Myrick
Neugebauer
Olson, P.
Pence
Pitts
Posey
Rogers (AL)
Rooney
Ryan, Paul
Shuster
Smith, C
Smith, L.
Wamp
Westmoreland
Jones, Walter
 
You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.


You could have signed my name to this one, until this statement popped up. "Safe and moral" that's what I hate about the left and the right, teach your children your morals AT HOME you lazy bastards. Stop dropping them off in school and expecting teachers to teach them about Jesus and praying or about homos and "tolerance". If your too lazy to teach your own children about morals on your own time you shouldn't freaking have kids. Schools aren't here to raise your children, they're here to teach them ABCs and 123s.
 
You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.


You could have signed my name to this one, until this statement popped up. "Safe and moral" that's what I hate about the left and the right, teach your children your morals AT HOME you lazy bastards. Stop dropping them off in school and expecting teachers to teach them about Jesus and praying or about homos and "tolerance". If your too lazy to teach your own children about morals on your own time you shouldn't freaking have kids. Schools aren't here to raise your children, they're here to teach them ABCs and 123s.

Absolutely but damn give the kids a chance to go to a "safe and moral" environment if they attend public schools. Most people do not want their children taught or exploited by perverts period. It is not up to schools to teach "morals" yet the schools should be required to act with "moral" intent towards all children. That covers a lot of ground. From lying teachers to pressing your religion or personal beliefs onto children. Get the schools back to the basics. I'm sorry but a porn writer and director has no business teaching in a public school full of teenage girls either. I do not think that college professors should ever be allowed to be pimping out college students either. These are the "moral" type decisions people are asking for up to an including staying away from teaching children sexual practices of any kind in school. Schools are not respecting children or there parents when they allow such to transpire within public schools. The majority of people do not have an option for private schools so at least demand some decency from the public school system. Public schools were never supposed to be indoctrination clinics for any type of special interest group, none.
 
You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.


You could have signed my name to this one, until this statement popped up. "Safe and moral" that's what I hate about the left and the right, teach your children your morals AT HOME you lazy bastards. Stop dropping them off in school and expecting teachers to teach them about Jesus and praying or about homos and "tolerance". If your too lazy to teach your own children about morals on your own time you shouldn't freaking have kids. Schools aren't here to raise your children, they're here to teach them ABCs and 123s.

Absolutely but damn give the kids a chance to go to a "safe and moral" environment if they attend public schools. Most people do not want their children taught or exploited by perverts period. It is not up to schools to teach "morals" yet the schools should be required to act with "moral" intent towards all children. That covers a lot of ground. From lying teachers to pressing your religion or personal beliefs onto children. Get the schools back to the basics. I'm sorry but a porn writer and director has no business teaching in a public school full of teenage girls either. I do not think that college professors should ever be allowed to be pimping out college students either. These are the "moral" type decisions people are asking for up to an including staying away from teaching children sexual practices of any kind in school. Schools are not respecting children or there parents when they allow such to transpire within public schools. The majority of people do not have an option for private schools so at least demand some decency from the public school system. Public schools were never supposed to be indoctrination clinics for any type of special interest group, none.

I'm good with safe. Moral implies some sort of instillment of "values", even "patriotic values" shouldn't be taught in the schools. I think we've taken this using public schools to indoctrinate children and come up with a perfect God loving / and or tolerant homosexual prototype thing a little to far, period. I agree with you on the perverts thing though, and of ALL the so-called "exposed" members of Obama's White House staff this is the one I have reservations about because he IS in a position to effect the Education system. I don't care if he's homosexual either, that's fine, what you do on your time is your business but don't push ANY sexuality on my (futuristic) children. As long as they're in my (futuristic) house I push my own beliefs on them and that's MY right not yours. Jennings IS however a pervert for the whole child comming to him about a grown man thing. Quite frankly I'm suspicious of any teacher who has a "close relationship" to the student without parental involvement, outside of I help this child out after school because he doesn't have anyone else to turn to.
 
I can see it now 53 Republics are now on the hit list of the radical Leftwingnuts.
October 15, 2009

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President,

We respectfully request that you remove Kevin Jennings, the Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools, from your Administration. It is clear that Mr. Jennings lacks the appropriate qualifications and ethical standards to serve in this capacity.

As the founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Mr. Jennings has played an integral role in promoting homosexuality and pushing a pro-homosexual agenda in America’s schools—an agenda that runs counter to the values that many parents desire to instill in their children. As evidence of this, Mr. Jennings wrote the foreword for a book titled Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue About Sexualities and Schooling. Throughout his career, Mr. Jennings has made it his mission to establish special protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered students to the exclusion of all other students. The totality of Mr. Jennings’ career has been to advocate for public affirmation of homosexuality. There is more to safe and drug free schools than can be accomplished from the narrow view of Mr. Jennings who has, for more than 20 years, almost exclusively focused on promoting the homosexual agenda.

Equally troubling is Mr. Jennings’ self-described history of ignoring the sexual abuse of a child. In his book, One Teacher in Ten, Mr. Jennings recounts a 15-year old student confiding in him that he had a sexual relationship with a much older man. Mr. Jennings’ only response was to ask if the underage boy used a condom. As a mandatory reporter, Mr. Jennings was required by law to report child abuse, including sex crimes. Mr. Jennings cannot serve as the “safe schools” czar when his record demonstrates a willingness to overlook the sexual abuse of a child.

As the “safe schools” czar, Mr. Jennings is also charged with ensuring our schools and students are drug free. It is clear that Mr. Jennings is unfit to serve in this capacity, as well. His own history of unrepentant drug and alcohol abuse indicates that he is of the opinion that getting drunk and high as a young person is acceptable. In his memoir, Mama’s Boy, Preacher’s Son, Mr. Jennings describes his use of illegal drugs, without expressing regret or acknowledging the devastating effects illegal drug use can have on a person’s life.

Everyone that deals with the education of the most vulnerable must be a positive role model. Our children are not blessed with the wisdom to discern and reject. Children presume the adults who educate them are approved by the larger society and their parents. Kevin Jennings cannot gain the approval of parents who want their children safe and their schools drug free. You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.

Given these very serious issues with Mr. Jennings’ record, we urge you to remove him immediately.

Sincerely,

KING
Alexander
Aderholt
Akin
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Bartlett
Barton
Boozman
Broun
Brown, H.
Carter
Chaffetz
Coffman
Cole
Conaway
Davis, Geoff
Fallin
Fleming
Foxx
Franks
Garrett
Gingrey
Gohmert
Hunter
Issa
Jordan
Lamborn
Latta
LuetkemeyerMarchant
McClintock
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris
Mica
Miller, J.
Myrick
Neugebauer
Olson, P.
Pence
Pitts
Posey
Rogers (AL)
Rooney
Ryan, Paul
Shuster
Smith, C
Smith, L.
Wamp
Westmoreland
Jones, Walter

Glad to see that my Republican Congresswoman didn't put her name on this foolishness. I think doing the opposite of whatever it is Michelle Bachman does is just good policy.
 
Oh please. This letter carries NO weight and is basically meaningless. I don't think any on the left will worry themselves with the 53 morons who were dumb enough to lend their names to it.
 
Michelle Bachman is oinkly and boinkly like Sarah Palin, and just as much a box of rocks as she.
 
What a load of leftist hogwash -the repondents not the initial post. Moral means in this case leaving it to the parents to instill moral values. Not trampling on the parents views. Moral means you don't use others to please yourself or use them at all.
 
"Education is the means by which society passes its values on to the next generation."
Based on that alone, schools ought to teach moral values. The whole "schools should be value free" has resulted in kids being value free. And who wants more of that??
 
You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.


You could have signed my name to this one, until this statement popped up. "Safe and moral" that's what I hate about the left and the right, teach your children your morals AT HOME you lazy bastards. Stop dropping them off in school and expecting teachers to teach them about Jesus and praying or about homos and "tolerance". If your too lazy to teach your own children about morals on your own time you shouldn't freaking have kids. Schools aren't here to raise your children, they're here to teach them ABCs and 123s.

So there is no reason for a safe schools czar.
Fire his ass and don't replace him.
 
Our children are not blessed with the wisdom to discern and reject. Children presume the adults who educate them are approved by the larger society and their parents.

Bullshit.

And beyond that, this letter gets all hysterical like Jennings is going to be in every classroom, every day, across America poisoning minds. Talk about paranoia.
 
Our children are not blessed with the wisdom to discern and reject. Children presume the adults who educate them are approved by the larger society and their parents.

Bullshit.

And beyond that, this letter gets all hysterical like Jennings is going to be in every classroom, every day, across America poisoning minds. Talk about paranoia.
He is pushing an agenda and he has been put into an authoritative position. Anyone that goes with this flow are just as sick as he is.
 
Our children are not blessed with the wisdom to discern and reject. Children presume the adults who educate them are approved by the larger society and their parents.

Bullshit.

And beyond that, this letter gets all hysterical like Jennings is going to be in every classroom, every day, across America poisoning minds. Talk about paranoia.

So, do you think children are blessed with the wisdom to discern and reject?
And that children don't presume the adults who educate them are approved by the larger society and their parents?
Or do you just like saying the word "bullshit" for no reason?
 
What a load of leftist hogwash -the repondents not the initial post. Moral means in this case leaving it to the parents to instill moral values. Not trampling on the parents views. Moral means you don't use others to please yourself or use them at all.

moral/ˈmɔrəl, ˈmɒr-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [mawr-uhl, mor-] Show IPA
Use moral in a Sentence
See web results for moral
See images of moral
–adjective 1. of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes.
Moral Definition | Definition of Moral at Dictionary.com

No one, will sit my (futuristic) children down for 6 hours and teach them right from wrong but me. Therefore, I would appreciate it if they do not teach my children to pray, I'll do that. They will not teach my children to be "good citizens", I'll do that. It's a simple neo-coon republican trick... you believe in the responsability of the parents and the individual until you want someone to indoctrinate children on somebody's religion. HELL NO!! Can't have it both ways bruh. Keep your morals, liberal or conservative, the Hell out of schools and teach the damn children ABCs and 123s.
 
"Education is the means by which society passes its values on to the next generation."
Based on that alone, schools ought to teach moral values. The whole "schools should be value free" has resulted in kids being value free. And who wants more of that??

Bullshit. Boy for a so-called conservative you sure don't see collectivized brainwashing when it's ACTUALLY INFRONT OF YOU. Listen to me... I DO NOT WANT MY (futuristic) CHILDREN FOLLOWING SOCIETIES VALUES... neither do most people because society's values tend to suck and not work anyway. We are not all collective property upon which the education system can "pass values" on to us. That's lunacy. If they're my children and live in my house they'll have MY values. If your to lazy to raise your kids properly that's your damn business... not the business of the state. Small government my ass. Where's MM to rail about personal responsability, I'm getting tired of doing it for him.:lol:
 
You should replace him with someone who has a record of educating children in a safe and moral environment.


You could have signed my name to this one, until this statement popped up. "Safe and moral" that's what I hate about the left and the right, teach your children your morals AT HOME you lazy bastards. Stop dropping them off in school and expecting teachers to teach them about Jesus and praying or about homos and "tolerance". If your too lazy to teach your own children about morals on your own time you shouldn't freaking have kids. Schools aren't here to raise your children, they're here to teach them ABCs and 123s.

So there is no reason for a safe schools czar.
Fire his ass and don't replace him.

THERE HE IS. :lol: Yeah... f-em. All his job is to implement programs where kids are planting trees and releasing doves out of cages and all that good ish. As far behind as this nation's education system is in math in science from the rest of the World... you'd think they'd figure out that morals and values don't get you smart people, just dumb polite people.
 
What a load of leftist hogwash -the repondents not the initial post. Moral means in this case leaving it to the parents to instill moral values. Not trampling on the parents views. Moral means you don't use others to please yourself or use them at all.

moral/ˈmɔrəl, ˈmɒr-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [mawr-uhl, mor-] Show IPA
Use moral in a Sentence
See web results for moral
See images of moral
–adjective 1. of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes.
Moral Definition | Definition of Moral at Dictionary.com

No one, will sit my (futuristic) children down for 6 hours and teach them right from wrong but me. Therefore, I would appreciate it if they do not teach my children to pray, I'll do that. They will not teach my children to be "good citizens", I'll do that. It's a simple neo-coon republican trick... you believe in the responsability of the parents and the individual until you want someone to indoctrinate children on somebody's religion. HELL NO!! Can't have it both ways bruh. Keep your morals, liberal or conservative, the Hell out of schools and teach the damn children ABCs and 123s.

That's why people home-school.
Most home schoolers are conservative.
You can use terms like "neo-coon" all you want, but it's milidems that are screwing up the education system in this country.
 

Forum List

Back
Top