5.7 million illegal votes

Flash

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 2014
71,172
62,001
3,645
Florida
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

The Drity Democrats say that Voter ID laws are voter supression, but it's only voter fraud supression.
Everytime a non-citizen votes he takes away a citizen's right to vote.
voterfrauddemocratsfraud.jpg


illegal-immigrants-obammmma-voting-booth.jpg
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
Very vague when presenting its caseload..
On the other side are the professors who conducted the study and contended that “zero” noncitizens of about 18 million adults in the U.S. voted. The liberal mainstream media adopted this position and proclaimed the Old Dominion work was “debunked.”
The mainstream media is not a source of accuracy or scientific values, many non-immigrants vote in local elections where available but the article is generalizing.
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
Very vague when presenting its caseload..
On the other side are the professors who conducted the study and contended that “zero” noncitizens of about 18 million adults in the U.S. voted. The liberal mainstream media adopted this position and proclaimed the Old Dominion work was “debunked.”
The mainstream media is not a source of accuracy or scientific values, many non-immigrants vote in local elections where available but the article is generalizing.
Moon!
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
If it was 5.7 million in 2008 imagine what it was in 2016 with Trump running on a platform to seal the border.

Crooked Hillary didn't come close to winning the popular vote just like we said. At least not legally.
 
:lol: what a load of shit. You Dotards will fall for anything.
 
This study validates the corruption in the states with the highest number of Illegals and the worst voter ID requirements having the highest percentage of votes for the filthy Democrats.

Without the Illegals, welfare queens and bat shit crazy asshole pink pussy hat Moon Bats the Democrat Party would be hard put to get 20% of the vote.
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.
This may be a little out of date, but it fits in with the cases that are coming to the surface in places like TEXAS where 4 Mexican women were caught with illegal vote and should be charged with the crime. I really wonder how many more are out there that we will never find out about.
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

Total bullshit. They have been peddling this bullshit for years and have never supported a single "finding" they claim. There is a reason there is never a link to their work.
 
:lol: what a load of shit. You Dotards will fall for anything.


This is my favorite part of the article...a lot of words that say nothing.

Mr. Agresti lays out his reasoning in a series of complicated calculations, which he compares to U.S. Census Bureau figures for noncitizen residents. Polls show noncitizens vote overwhelmingly Democratic.

“The details are technical, but the figure I calculated is based on a more conservative margin of sampling error and a methodology that I consider to be more accurate,” Mr. Agresti told The Washington Times.
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

Total bullshit. They have been peddling this bullshit for years and have never supported a single "finding" they claim. There is a reason there is never a link to their work.

:lol: what a load of shit. You Dotards will fall for anything.


This is my favorite part of the article...a lot of words that say nothing.

Mr. Agresti lays out his reasoning in a series of complicated calculations, which he compares to U.S. Census Bureau figures for noncitizen residents. Polls show noncitizens vote overwhelmingly Democratic.

“The details are technical, but the figure I calculated is based on a more conservative margin of sampling error and a methodology that I consider to be more accurate,” Mr. Agresti told The Washington Times.

Haha..You LefTards are terrified of the probability principle...fucking hilarious. You hate to connect the dots don’t you?
 
This study validates the corruption in the states with the highest number of Illegals and the worst voter ID requirements having the highest percentage of votes for the filthy Democrats.

Without the Illegals, welfare queens and bat shit crazy asshole pink pussy hat Moon Bats the Democrat Party would be hard put to get 20% of the vote.
LOLOLOL

All that study validates is that you’re a flaming nut since the study itself is based on flawed data. The Harvard/YouGov data was based on unscientific non-probability polling. That in itself is a major handicap. Even worse, there are inconsistencies which cannot be overcome where they polled the same respondents every 2 years and were given different answers to the same question. That question was, are you a citizen; and there were numerous instances where respondents answered ‘yes’ in one year, but then ‘no’ when polled 2 years later.

Another serious flaw was the small sample of respondents who identified themselves as being an illegal alien. The smaller the sample, the less reliable the polling. Just Facts’ exasperated that flaw by extrapolating the results to the full number of illegal aliens in the country, which only explodes the margin of error. Even worse for Just Facts’, they ignored the actual “official” number of illegal aliens in the country and made up their own number; greatly increasing the size of those they claim voted illegally.

And then one must overcome that their entire approach was flawed from the start as they only considered two camps...

Just Facts’ conclusions confront both sides in the illegal voting debate: those who say it happens a lot and those who say the problem nonexistent.

... but there’s a third camp... those who say it happens, but negligibly.

And where it all falls apart for you is that only a couple of illegal aliens have been caught. It’s inconceivable that nearly 6 million illegal aliens, roughly ½ of the illegal population in the U.S., have been able to avoid detection for decades.
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

Total bullshit. They have been peddling this bullshit for years and have never supported a single "finding" they claim. There is a reason there is never a link to their work.

:lol: what a load of shit. You Dotards will fall for anything.


This is my favorite part of the article...a lot of words that say nothing.

Mr. Agresti lays out his reasoning in a series of complicated calculations, which he compares to U.S. Census Bureau figures for noncitizen residents. Polls show noncitizens vote overwhelmingly Democratic.

“The details are technical, but the figure I calculated is based on a more conservative margin of sampling error and a methodology that I consider to be more accurate,” Mr. Agresti told The Washington Times.

Haha..You LefTards are terrified of the probability principle...fucking hilarious. You hate to connect the dots don’t you?
Loser, the study was based on unscientific non-probability polling on the Internet. Rather than complete randomness, they selectively chose respondents who were a best match with their target sampling.

Second, for each member of the target sample, we select one or more matching members from our pool of opt-in respondents. This is called the matched sample. Matching is accomplished using a large set of variables that are available in consumer and voter databases for both the target population and the opt-in panel.

more...
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.


View attachment 206252
Politifact? Lol
 
Yea, we were right,


Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens may have cast illegal votes


A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

Total bullshit. They have been peddling this bullshit for years and have never supported a single "finding" they claim. There is a reason there is never a link to their work.

:lol: what a load of shit. You Dotards will fall for anything.


This is my favorite part of the article...a lot of words that say nothing.

Mr. Agresti lays out his reasoning in a series of complicated calculations, which he compares to U.S. Census Bureau figures for noncitizen residents. Polls show noncitizens vote overwhelmingly Democratic.

“The details are technical, but the figure I calculated is based on a more conservative margin of sampling error and a methodology that I consider to be more accurate,” Mr. Agresti told The Washington Times.

Haha..You LefTards are terrified of the probability principle...fucking hilarious. You hate to connect the dots don’t you?
Loser, the study was based on unscientific non-probability polling on the Internet. Rather than complete randomness, they selectively chose respondents who were a best match with their target sampling.

Second, for each member of the target sample, we select one or more matching members from our pool of opt-in respondents. This is called the matched sample. Matching is accomplished using a large set of variables that are available in consumer and voter databases for both the target population and the opt-in panel.

more...

The probability of wetbacks voting has little to do with this particular study....NEVER in this nations history have illegal wetbacks been empowered by American politicians like they have been since 2008...NEVER have our elected politicians invited them here.... NEVER have our politicians declared entire cities and states as SANCTUARIES for illegal wetbacks.....NEVER have our politicians encouraged illegal wetbacks to vote in local elections...NEVER has a sitting American President told illegal wetbacks to vote in our elections...NEVER have they been more motivated to invade our nation.
You, Golfing Gator and many more are simply dumbing yourselves down and playing stupid on this one..PERIOD!
 
The illegal vote is why the left fights hard against Voter I.D. laws..............Time and time again there are reports of illegals voting and illegals admitting they vote.

The actual numbers voting............probably just guessing but in the millions I'd have to agree...........

They are afraid of Voter I.D. for a reason, but always call it voter suppression when challenged...........Liberals are a bunch of Lying Sacks.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top