4th Woman to come forward in Cain Scandal

Two questions.

Why did it take you four women so fucking long? Money wasn't right? or what?



Do you remember Clarence Thomas? welldoyahuh?





I don't believe a fucking work any of these four women say. I would have had they stepped forward when it happened, but not now.. not now.

Umm, they did step forward when it happened. The result was that they got a settlement and a confidentiality agreement.
So lets look at this...

the "victims" settled for 35K (from what I hear)...that is deemed as small potratos in the legal industry

He was not fired.

The woman settled for money...that speaks volumes unless they also demanded Cain was fired....but they didnt...they took 35K and ran.

I say there was nothing here but a few women who dont like to be called "honey" in the workplace.
 
Two questions.

Why did it take you four women so fucking long? Money wasn't right? or what?



Do you remember Clarence Thomas? welldoyahuh?





I don't believe a fucking work any of these four women say. I would have had they stepped forward when it happened, but not now.. not now.

Umm, they did step forward when it happened. The result was that they got a settlement and a confidentiality agreement.

And today they're holding a press conference?
Wow! There's a lot of integrity among that bunch.
 
Two questions.

Why did it take you four women so fucking long? Money wasn't right? or what?



Do you remember Clarence Thomas? welldoyahuh?





I don't believe a fucking work any of these four women say. I would have had they stepped forward when it happened, but not now.. not now.

Umm, they did step forward when it happened. The result was that they got a settlement and a confidentiality agreement.





so they took money? and now they're breaking the contract? he should sue them for all they're worth.

if you didn't know these things already, why are you commenting on this shit? Oh it's you, it's Willow.
 
Two questions.

Why did it take you four women so fucking long? Money wasn't right? or what?



Do you remember Clarence Thomas? welldoyahuh?





I don't believe a fucking work any of these four women say. I would have had they stepped forward when it happened, but not now.. not now.

Umm, they did step forward when it happened. The result was that they got a settlement and a confidentiality agreement.
So lets look at this...

the "victims" settled for 35K (from what I hear)...that is deemed as small potratos in the legal industry

He was not fired.

The woman settled for money...that speaks volumes unless they also demanded Cain was fired....but they didnt...they took 35K and ran.

I say there was nothing here but a few women who dont like to be called "honey" in the workplace.

I think you're wrong.
I say there was nothing here but a few women who don't like to be called "Dear" in the workplace.
 
When are women going to realize that they were put on this earth so we can have someone to sexually harrass.....well, that and someone to get us the remote control when it isnt within arms reach....
 
Two questions.

Why did it take you four women so fucking long? Money wasn't right? or what?



Do you remember Clarence Thomas? welldoyahuh?





I don't believe a fucking work any of these four women say. I would have had they stepped forward when it happened, but not now.. not now.

Umm, they did step forward when it happened. The result was that they got a settlement and a confidentiality agreement.





so they took money? and now they're breaking the contract? he should sue them for all they're worth.

Agreed. If the thing was settled, they were paid - and they're out today re-opening something that was a non-starter to begin with, I'd sue the ever-loving shit out of them.
 
Oh, this is gonna be fuuuuun.
Yeah, right! All sorts of lies will be manufactured to destroy the man. Politicians have no conscience, no ethics and no limit to what they will do to destroy opponents and make headlines for their own cause and benefit. I can hear them thinking, "Hey, I can get a book or movie deal if I make up some lucrative shit about Herman Cain...the ball is already rolling. Call Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson!"

Sickos!
 
Umm, they did step forward when it happened. The result was that they got a settlement and a confidentiality agreement.





so they took money? and now they're breaking the contract? he should sue them for all they're worth.

Agreed. If the thing was settled, they were paid - and they're out today re-opening something that was a non-starter to begin with, I'd sue the ever-loving shit out of them.





They are such COWS
 
Two questions.

Why did it take you four women so fucking long? Money wasn't right? or what?



Do you remember Clarence Thomas? welldoyahuh?





I don't believe a fucking work any of these four women say. I would have had they stepped forward when it happened, but not now.. not now.

Umm, they did step forward when it happened. The result was that they got a settlement and a confidentiality agreement.
So lets look at this...

the "victims" settled for 35K (from what I hear)...that is deemed as small potratos in the legal industry

He was not fired.

The woman settled for money...that speaks volumes unless they also demanded Cain was fired....but they didnt...they took 35K and ran.

I say there was nothing here but a few women who dont like to be called "honey" in the workplace.

Fired from being the President of it?

I say, we don't know if this is true or false and we have 4 reasons to believe one way, a guy who changes his story three times, and people with a vested interest to pay off the ladies for breaking their agreement. (Opposing Campaigns).

I also think: if it's true, fuck him.
If it's not, he's still a fuddy duddy to me regardless. His 9-9-9 has been giggled at by CONSERVATIVE Economists en masse, he has no clue (admittedly) on what his foreign policy would be, and he's not sure if Abortion should be legal or illegal.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JD-sBPBzpmE]Is Herman Cain Pro-Life? - YouTube[/ame]
 
The comparison to Clinton is insanely partisan and wholly retarded, since consensual sex is not sexual harassment. Even the most remedial of idiots knows and understands this. But let's just say for the sake of argument that the comparison holds a sliver of validity. What then? Is it the contention of those peddling this bogus comparison that because Clinton got away with it then Cain should too? If so, that is seriously fucking deranged... and then some. If not, then wtf is the point of the comparison?
Being raped is not a consensual thing.
 
Umm, they did step forward when it happened. The result was that they got a settlement and a confidentiality agreement.
So lets look at this...

the "victims" settled for 35K (from what I hear)...that is deemed as small potratos in the legal industry

He was not fired.

The woman settled for money...that speaks volumes unless they also demanded Cain was fired....but they didnt...they took 35K and ran.

I say there was nothing here but a few women who dont like to be called "honey" in the workplace.

Fired from being the President of it?

I say, we don't know if this is true or false and we have 4 reasons to believe one way, a guy who changes his story three times, and people with a vested interest to pay off the ladies for breaking their agreement. (Opposing Campaigns).

I also think: if it's true, fuck him.
If it's not, he's still a fuddy duddy to me regardless. His 9-9-9 has been giggled at by CONSERVATIVE Economists en masse, he has no clue (admittedly) on what his foreign policy would be, and he's not sure if Abortion should be legal or illegal.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JD-sBPBzpmE]Is Herman Cain Pro-Life? - YouTube[/ame]

I think its true but if it isnt I hate him for who he is anyway.
Quite mature of you.

Obama changed his story three times regarding his relationship with Ayers.....but, of course, that doesnt count.

And yes...if he truly sexually harrassed 4 women, he would have been fired...and if the first one had merit, the second would have been a MUCH larger settltement...and the thrid even LARGER...and the fourth? She would have never opened her mouth because HER settlemtn would have been in 7 figures.

I see you are another bloviator who has no idea what goes on in the business world as it pertains to adherence to HR laws, rules and regulations.
 
All sorts of lies will be manufactured to destroy the man.

The next manufactured lie to surface related to this story will be the first.

But don't let facts get in the way of a good tardisan rant. :thup:

As I recall, you have no problem manufacturing "proof". Where is your proof that any one of the women have told the truth?
 
She says he put his hand up her skirt.

Cain's campaign just sent USA today an email trying to discredit Gloria Allred as a celebrity lawyer.....this is the lawyer that represented the porn star against Weiner. And OJ's murder victim's family.

Toast. Absolute toast.
 

Doesn't it occur to you that this thread will merely draw the comparison to your hero, Bill Clinton?

Four women?
A novice....

And not even one rape!

And, speaking of Bill Clinton, I always like this note:

“Worst of all, in the 1990’s we saw, for the first time in our history, a president a willing to accept political favors from a potentially hostile foreign power, at the same time he took extraordinary steps to make them more powerful. Even more ominously, Bill Clinton not only enabled the People’s Republic of China to obtain our finest military technology while accepting contributions to his political campaigns; whenever professional civil servants charged with guarding our national security challenged his actions they were intimidated by their political superiors.” Ledeen, “Tocqueville on American Character,” p. 189-190.


So if Cain gets through the miasma, you think we can look forward to this kind of treason?

Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?

Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.

It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.

republicans dont mind sexual predators as long as they are republicans.........
 
Oh, yeah. He's toast.

Cain accuser: 'Come clean,' admit harassment

2:02 p.m. ET

Bialek says she told her boyfriend and "a mentor at the time" that Cain had been inappropriate. She said she was "embarrassed" and didn't go into details.

2:01 p.m. ET

Bialek says Cain offered to help her find a job with one of the state restaurant associations.

"He suddenly reached over and put his hand on my leg, under my skirt and reached for my genitals," she said.

2 p.m. ET

Bialek describes a situation in 1997, where she met him in the bar at the Capital Hilton in Washington, D.C. She said he helped arrange a "palatial suite" at the hotel for her.

"I upgraded you," Bialek says Cain told her.

Start at the bottom and go to the top for the posts in chronological order.
 
All sorts of lies will be manufactured to destroy the man.

The next manufactured lie to surface related to this story will be the first.

But don't let facts get in the way of a good tardisan rant. :thup:

As I recall, you have no problem manufacturing "proof". Where is your proof that any one of the women have told the truth?

Where is your proof that I've claimed any such thing?
 
His campaign sounds off;

Just as the country finally begins to refocus on our crippling $15 trillion national debt and the unacceptably high unemployment rate, now activist celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred is bringing forth more false accusations against the character of Republican front-runner Herman Cain.

All allegations of harassment against Mr. Cain are completely false. Mr. Cain has never harassed anyone. Fortunately the American people will not allow Mr. Cain's bold "9-9-9 Plan", clear foreign policy vision and plans for energy independence to be overshadowed by these bogus attacks.

Same link as above post.
 
So lets look at this...

the "victims" settled for 35K (from what I hear)...that is deemed as small potratos in the legal industry

He was not fired.

The woman settled for money...that speaks volumes unless they also demanded Cain was fired....but they didnt...they took 35K and ran.

I say there was nothing here but a few women who dont like to be called "honey" in the workplace.

Fired from being the President of it?

I say, we don't know if this is true or false and we have 4 reasons to believe one way, a guy who changes his story three times, and people with a vested interest to pay off the ladies for breaking their agreement. (Opposing Campaigns).

I also think: if it's true, fuck him.
If it's not, he's still a fuddy duddy to me regardless. His 9-9-9 has been giggled at by CONSERVATIVE Economists en masse, he has no clue (admittedly) on what his foreign policy would be, and he's not sure if Abortion should be legal or illegal.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JD-sBPBzpmE]Is Herman Cain Pro-Life? - YouTube[/ame]

I think its true but if it isnt I hate him for who he is anyway.
Quite mature of you.

Obama changed his story three times regarding his relationship with Ayers.....but, of course, that doesnt count.

And yes...if he truly sexually harrassed 4 women, he would have been fired...and if the first one had merit, the second would have been a MUCH larger settltement...and the thrid even LARGER...and the fourth? She would have never opened her mouth because HER settlemtn would have been in 7 figures.

I see you are another bloviator who has no idea what goes on in the business world as it pertains to adherence to HR laws, rules and regulations.


thanks to the nda's, the women were not able to be warned they were being placed near sexual predator cain........
 

Forum List

Back
Top