$45B more in corporate welfare headed Obama Motors' way

Revere

Rookie
Jan 23, 2010
7,427
423
0
Watching you in my profile page
Uh, is this one of those things Darrell Issa should not "waste taxpayers' money" investigating?

Thanks, unions!

Love - Barry

GM Could Be Free of Taxes for Years - WSJ.com

General Motors Co. will drive away from its U.S.-government-financed restructuring with a final gift in its trunk: a tax break that could be worth as much as $45 billion.

GM, which plans to begin promoting its relisting on the stock exchange to investors this week, wiped out billions of dollars in debt, laid off thousands of employees and jettisoned money-losing brands during its U.S.-funded reorganization last year.

Now it turns out, according to documents filed with federal regulators, the revamping left the car maker with another boost as it prepares to return to the stock market. It won't have to pay $45.4 billion in taxes on future profits.
 
From your link:

But the government, in a little-noticed ruling last year, decided companies that received bailout money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program won't fall under that rule.

"The Internal Revenue Service has decided that the government's involvement with these companies, both its acquisitions plus its disposals of their stock, means they should be exempt" from the rule, said Robert Willens, a New York tax consultant who advises investment banks and hedge funds.

Wasn't TARP Bush's brainchild?
 
Wasn't TARP Bush's brainchild?

Yup, Bush and Paulson, though the righties will never let themselves see it. These jokers were supply-side randians right up to the point of...FAIL.

Then they did the proper Keynesian thing.

But the wingnuts will never, ever let reality intrude on their fantasy.
 
Yea January can't come fast enough. They'll slip this one in during their Lame Duck session. Hopefully things can be looked into properly starting in January.
 
perpetual bailout of General Motors.

They're going public again numbnuts. Though you think that letting GM fail was a good idea, it wasn't.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Yes, I am aware they are going public. Obama is trying to artificially inflate the value of his company.

GM would not fail. It's assets would be bought at market, which is the way it should be.

Instead of bailing out the UAW.
 
From your link:

But the government, in a little-noticed ruling last year, decided companies that received bailout money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program won't fall under that rule.

"The Internal Revenue Service has decided that the government's involvement with these companies, both its acquisitions plus its disposals of their stock, means they should be exempt" from the rule, said Robert Willens, a New York tax consultant who advises investment banks and hedge funds.

Wasn't TARP Bush's brainchild?

Yeup, expanded and perpetuated by Obama.

The more things "change" the more they stay the same.

Audit the Fed.
 
From your link:

But the government, in a little-noticed ruling last year, decided companies that received bailout money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program won't fall under that rule.

"The Internal Revenue Service has decided that the government's involvement with these companies, both its acquisitions plus its disposals of their stock, means they should be exempt" from the rule, said Robert Willens, a New York tax consultant who advises investment banks and hedge funds.

Wasn't TARP Bush's brainchild?


The original TARP was only for financial institutions - which were required to repay the funds. Those repayments in turn were supposed to be used to reduce the deficit.

The One abused the TARP to bail out GM.
 

Forum List

Back
Top