Dad2three
Gold Member
Actually, they were "regulated," but not really regulated.
They were regulated, period.
Hardly. Try this feature for details:
House Of Cards The Mortgage Mess - CBS News
Let me just clarify.... I don't want to imply you are saying something that you are not.
FDsys - Browse Code of Federal Regulations Annual Edition
This web site is the Federal Code of Regulations, for the year 2000.
If you scroll down to Title 12, Banks and Banking, you will discover that the regulations come in a 6 Volume set. If you download all 6 volumes, (as I have done), you will discovered over 4,000 pages of regulations on virtually all aspects of banking.
In addition, you will discovered several government bodies created to monitor banks, including Federal Financing Bank, Federal Housing Finance Board, Department of the Treasury which has it's own regulations, FDIC which has it's own regulations, and lastly Comptroller of the Currency which has it's own regulations.
But wait! There's more!
Moving down to Title 17, you'll find a three volume set, containing over 2,400 pages exclusively to regulation on securities.
Then moving to Title 24, you'll find another three volumes, of just under 1500 pages, and while they are not all related to mortgage securities, some are, such as Government National Mortgage Association, Office of Assistant Secretary for Housing, and Office of Housing and Office of Multifamily Housing Assistance Restructuring, each with their own various regulations that must be followed.
And of course, if you wish to claim that the roughly 8,000 pages of regulations that existed back in 2000, regulating and over-seeing every aspect of banks was just far too limited and modest.....
Lawriter - ORC - Title 11 XI FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Let us add in State Level banking regulations as well. Ohio Revised Code, Title 11, contains no less than 80 Chapters regulating banks. That's just Ohio Revised Code. Many states have more regulations than Ohio.
Now.... Allow me to ask again.... Are you saying that the banks and mortgage backed securities were not regulated?
Failure due to deregulation was the conclusion made by the FCIC:
Government policies and the subprime mortgage crisis - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Are you telling me..... that you are going to the word of the people who caused the problem... over the facts that already know? Are you saying there were not 8,000 pages of regulations? Because I have already posted direct links to those regulations.
So you can't examine the evidence yourself, but blindly follow what some government agency says? And by the way..... who benefits from this conclusion? Government. See if they came to the conclusion "our policies caused the problem", we would blame government, and people would lose their cushy government agency positions. Can't have that.
Instead let's blame deregulation, and what does that do? Well obviously we need MORE cushy government jobs, MORE lush paid government agencies.
Isn't it funny how when a company says "our product is great", you instantly realize a conflict of interest, but when government says "we need more government", no such ethical question comes to mind? Why do you blindly trust these guys?
I can't find any credible evidence that the problem was lack of regulation. If you have it, share it.
It WASN'T deregulation but WHO was in charge. Weird how Dubya allowed (and cheered on) the Bankster bubble, much like Ronnie Reagan who ignored Mr Gray's warnings in 1984 AND how the "free market" guys Harding/Coolidge allowed the Banksters to create a credit bubble after WW1...
Your dodge of FACTS like F/F not causing Dubya's Bankster bubble noted Bubba!