30 Countries REFUSE to take back Illegals Convicted of Crimes. Trump does nothing

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,363
280
Countries have been doing this for decades. Dumping their criminals and welfare trash on america while our presidents do nothing. Cancel all visas from these countries and end foreign aid to them.

30 Countries Are Refusing To Take Back Illegal Immigrants Convicted Of Serious Crimes

march 18 2017 Approximately 30 countries are refusing to accept the deportations of illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes in the U.S., according to Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar.

While these countries are refusing to accept the deportations of these criminals, the U.S. government is still issuing visas and student visas to citizens of those countries, according to the Texan congressman. There is already a law on the books which allows the U.S. to hold visas from a country that is not taking back its criminals, but according to Cuellar, the U.S. is not enforcing it.

“We’re not enforcing it, which is amazing. So now my intent is to go back to our committee on appropriations and affect their funding until they do that,” Cuellar told Sharyl Attkisson, host of Full Measure, in an interview.
 
Countries have been doing this for decades. Dumping their criminals and welfare trash on america while our presidents do nothing. Cancel all visas from these countries and end foreign aid to them.

30 Countries Are Refusing To Take Back Illegal Immigrants Convicted Of Serious Crimes

march 18 2017 Approximately 30 countries are refusing to accept the deportations of illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes in the U.S., according to Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar.

While these countries are refusing to accept the deportations of these criminals, the U.S. government is still issuing visas and student visas to citizens of those countries, according to the Texan congressman. There is already a law on the books which allows the U.S. to hold visas from a country that is not taking back its criminals, but according to Cuellar, the U.S. is not enforcing it.

“We’re not enforcing it, which is amazing. So now my intent is to go back to our committee on appropriations and affect their funding until they do that,” Cuellar told Sharyl Attkisson, host of Full Measure, in an interview.
Well you know he can't fix everything all at once the lib scum has destroyed.
 
Countries have been doing this for decades. Dumping their criminals and welfare trash on america while our presidents do nothing. Cancel all visas from these countries and end foreign aid to them.

30 Countries Are Refusing To Take Back Illegal Immigrants Convicted Of Serious Crimes

march 18 2017 Approximately 30 countries are refusing to accept the deportations of illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes in the U.S., according to Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar.

While these countries are refusing to accept the deportations of these criminals, the U.S. government is still issuing visas and student visas to citizens of those countries, according to the Texan congressman. There is already a law on the books which allows the U.S. to hold visas from a country that is not taking back its criminals, but according to Cuellar, the U.S. is not enforcing it.

“We’re not enforcing it, which is amazing. So now my intent is to go back to our committee on appropriations and affect their funding until they do that,” Cuellar told Sharyl Attkisson, host of Full Measure, in an interview.
Most of these countries such as Afghanistan, Algeria, Somalia and Zimbabwe either can not verify that these people are legally from their country or they can not do so within the time frame specified. Also the US does not have agreements with some of the countries on this list.

The Supreme Court has ruled that ICE can not detain undocumented immigrated for more than 6 months. Prior to this ruling, these people were just held indefinitely. Now if a convicted felon is picked up and detained and elects to go through the hearing process the time remaining before ICE must release the person may be only be a few months.

To complicate the issue, many of these people entered the US with forged documents or no documents at all. The person may claim they are from Zimbabwe but they are not legal residents of that country and may not be sure exactly what country is their origin, if any. In other words, they are stateless and most countries today will not accept them.

The United States lacks a consistent legal framework for dealing with stateless individuals, leaving many in protracted deportation proceedings in which they are released and then picked up and detained while the ICE searches for a place to deport them.

Using foreign aid as leverage for getting approved deportation from countries and other things we want is an option, but it's expensive. You only get so much leverage from foreign aid. If we use it up getting some deportations it may not be there for more important issues.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5

The Supreme Court has ruled that ICE can not detain undocumented immigrated for more than 6 months. Prior to this ruling, these people were just held indefinitely.

Point out the law written by congress that says illegals can only be held 6 months. I don't think you can and i think this is another law written by judges even though the constitution says only congress can write laws.
 

The Supreme Court has ruled that ICE can not detain undocumented immigrated for more than 6 months. Prior to this ruling, these people were just held indefinitely.

Point out the law written by congress that says illegals can only be held 6 months. I don't think you can and i think this is another law written by judges even though the constitution says only congress can write laws.
There is no law. There's the constitution, Article One, Section 9, clause 2. The federal appeals court has supported a lower court ruling that detainees can not be detained indefinitely without filing criminal charges. SOCTUS reviewed the case but has not overturned it, so any detainee can petition the court for release if they have been held for over 6 months.

Congress needs to pass a law specifying how long ICE can hold detainees without charges otherwise federal courts will make the decision as when detention becomes indefinite. This is just one of many changes that need to be made in immigration law.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
There is no law. There's the constitution, Article One, Section 9, clause 2. The federal appeals court has supported a lower court ruling that detainees can not be detained indefinitely without filing criminal charges. SOCTUS reviewed the case but has not overturned it, so any detainee can petition the court for release if they have been held for over 6 months.

Congress needs to pass a law specifying how long ICE can hold detainees without charges otherwise federal courts will make the decision as when detention becomes indefinite. This is just one of many changes that need to be made in immigration law.

The constitution says nothing about how long a detainee can be held. The judges just made up that 6 month rule. If a law is unclear the judges should refuse to hear the case until congress clarifies the law.
 
There is no law. There's the constitution, Article One, Section 9, clause 2. The federal appeals court has supported a lower court ruling that detainees can not be detained indefinitely without filing criminal charges. SOCTUS reviewed the case but has not overturned it, so any detainee can petition the court for release if they have been held for over 6 months.

Congress needs to pass a law specifying how long ICE can hold detainees without charges otherwise federal courts will make the decision as when detention becomes indefinite. This is just one of many changes that need to be made in immigration law.

The constitution says nothing about how long a detainee can be held. The judges just made up that 6 month rule. If a law is unclear the judges should refuse to hear the case until congress clarifies the law.
No the courts did not make up the 6 month rule. That came from ICE. As long the government adheres to a policy or law that establishes a maximum period of detention, then it's not in-definitive detention. You can't detain a person indefinitely without charging them with a crime. That is clearly a violation of the constitution. The lack of action of congress is no reason for the courts to ignore an obvious violation of the constitution. Undocumented immigrants have been held as much as a year with no charges or action being taken. There are countries where people can be detained for years with no charges and no due process but not in the US, at least not yet.
 
There is no law. There's the constitution, Article One, Section 9, clause 2. The federal appeals court has supported a lower court ruling that detainees can not be detained indefinitely without filing criminal charges. SOCTUS reviewed the case but has not overturned it, so any detainee can petition the court for release if they have been held for over 6 months.

Congress needs to pass a law specifying how long ICE can hold detainees without charges otherwise federal courts will make the decision as when detention becomes indefinite. This is just one of many changes that need to be made in immigration law.

The constitution says nothing about how long a detainee can be held. The judges just made up that 6 month rule. If a law is unclear the judges should refuse to hear the case until congress clarifies the law.

Sounds like a real problem for any idiot who limits themselves to what they think original intent might have been.
 

Forum List

Back
Top