3 people shot outside tube station in Britain (think subway station)...but, they banne guns...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,895
52,168
2,290
3 people were shot in Britain, the police don't think it is terror related....it is likely gang related...but that wouldn't be possible. Britain banned and confiscated guns, even for law abiding people, so obviously, criminals wouldn't be able to get them.

Three people shot outside Kingsbury tube station in north London | Metro News

Three people have been shot outside a Tube station in north London. Police rushed to Kingsbury High Road in Brent to reports of gunfire at around 9.45pm this evening. Officers found three people with gunshot wounds outside, but have so far made no arrests and confirmed the incident is not terror related.

 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.

Wrong. The OP is trying to use fear in their defense of guns. And, while there are a few out there who would like to ban guns altogether, the majority of the people simply want sensible gun control so that we can get a handle on the gun violence happening in this country.

No, even in spite of all the fear generated by the right, as well as the stupid musings of some on the left, guns are part of the fabric of America and will never be banned.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.

Wrong. The OP is trying to use fear in their defense of guns. And, while there are a few out there who would like to ban guns altogether, the majority of the people simply want sensible gun control so that we can get a handle on the gun violence happening in this country.

No, even in spite of all the fear generated by the right, as well as the stupid musings of some on the left, guns are part of the fabric of America and will never be banned.
No liar not wrong. Guns are banned and they are still used to murder. End of story.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.

Wrong. The OP is trying to use fear in their defense of guns. And, while there are a few out there who would like to ban guns altogether, the majority of the people simply want sensible gun control so that we can get a handle on the gun violence happening in this country.

No, even in spite of all the fear generated by the right, as well as the stupid musings of some on the left, guns are part of the fabric of America and will never be banned.
No liar not wrong. Guns are banned and they are still used to murder. End of story.

While they may be banned in Britain, that is not the case here in America, and never will be, even in spite of all the fear you sow saying that they are coming for your guns.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.

Wrong. The OP is trying to use fear in their defense of guns. And, while there are a few out there who would like to ban guns altogether, the majority of the people simply want sensible gun control so that we can get a handle on the gun violence happening in this country.

No, even in spite of all the fear generated by the right, as well as the stupid musings of some on the left, guns are part of the fabric of America and will never be banned.
No liar not wrong. Guns are banned and they are still used to murder. End of story.

While they may be banned in Britain, that is not the case here in America, and never will be, even in spite of all the fear you sow saying that they are coming for your guns.
Ah, the old bait and switch! You lost the first BS attempt so now you deflect away form the OP! Classic liberalism!
 
The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.

Wrong. The OP is trying to use fear in their defense of guns. And, while there are a few out there who would like to ban guns altogether, the majority of the people simply want sensible gun control so that we can get a handle on the gun violence happening in this country.

No, even in spite of all the fear generated by the right, as well as the stupid musings of some on the left, guns are part of the fabric of America and will never be banned.
No liar not wrong. Guns are banned and they are still used to murder. End of story.

While they may be banned in Britain, that is not the case here in America, and never will be, even in spite of all the fear you sow saying that they are coming for your guns.
Ah, the old bait and switch! You lost the first BS attempt so now you deflect away form the OP! Classic liberalism!

Didn't bait and switch anything. If you expand the conversation, you would see that I've always said that guns would never be taken away in this country, because they are part of the fabric of America. And, I also said that what happens in Britain isn't what is gonna happen here because we are 2 different countries with 2 different forms of government.
 
3 people were shot in Britain, the police don't think it is terror related....it is likely gang related...but that wouldn't be possible. Britain banned and confiscated guns, even for law abiding people, so obviously, criminals wouldn't be able to get them.

Three people shot outside Kingsbury tube station in north London | Metro News

Three people have been shot outside a Tube station in north London. Police rushed to Kingsbury High Road in Brent to reports of gunfire at around 9.45pm this evening. Officers found three people with gunshot wounds outside, but have so far made no arrests and confirmed the incident is not terror related.
Happy dance time. :dance:
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.
Can you point out where anyone (except for yourself) said that banning guns stops crime?
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.
Can you point out where anyone (except for yourself) said that banning guns stops crime?
Even your lies make no sense.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.


No.... that is what you anti gunners fail to realize when you push British gun control as a solution because their murder rate is lower than ours.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.

Wrong. The OP is trying to use fear in their defense of guns. And, while there are a few out there who would like to ban guns altogether, the majority of the people simply want sensible gun control so that we can get a handle on the gun violence happening in this country.

No, even in spite of all the fear generated by the right, as well as the stupid musings of some on the left, guns are part of the fabric of America and will never be banned.


There is no sensible gun control proposed by the anti gun left at this time. Nothing they propose would stop criminals or mass shooters from getting guns...as Britain shows, since they banned and confiscated guns and have an increasing gun crime problem... on an island...
 
And pray tell how many people were shot in Chicago alone last weekend? Sixty

Yeah, give me London any day of the week.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.


No.... that is what you anti gunners fail to realize when you push British gun control as a solution because their murder rate is lower than ours.

If you had read anything else I've posted in this thread, you would see that I have stated repeatedly that banning guns would never be an option, because guns are woven into the fabric of this country, like it or not.

Britain is a different country, with different laws, and a different form of government. No, a British style ban would never work here.
 
Oh good grief, more stupidity. So if everyone in the UK owned a gun, gang related shootings would suddenly stop?

The OP is trying to use Britain and people getting shot even in spite of their laws to scare people over here into supporting the NRA and gun rights.

Only problem is, apparently the OP doesn't realize that what happens in Britain isn't necessarily what is gonna happen here, because of the 2 different countries, with 2 different government things.
No troll, the OP is pointing out how banning guns does not stop crime. Liberals need crime.
Can you point out where anyone (except for yourself) said that banning guns stops crime?


It is the core premise of the anti gun argument..... you nutters believe that more guns = more crime and more gun crime. The United States shows that this isn't true. Britain shows that this isn't true.
 
And pray tell how many people were shot in Chicago alone last weekend? Sixty

Yeah, give me London any day of the week.


London had a low gun murder rate before they banned guns.....now, after banning guns, their gun crime rate keeps going up, not down.

Meanwhile, here in the U.S....

We went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 17.25 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
 
And pray tell how many people were shot in Chicago alone last weekend? Sixty

Yeah, give me London any day of the week.
Want help packing your bags? Watch out for the muslims.
 

Forum List

Back
Top