Discussion in 'Congress' started by 52ndStreet, Oct 11, 2017.
Musket practice, every Sunday!
There you go again spouting stupidity. What in the Hell is an "appeal to ignorance of the law?" How many years have you been spewing that line? If you're ignorant, I'm NOT appealing to you. I can't fix your stupidity. You'll have to see Dr. Phil about that. Or are you trying to piss me off again so your buddies will delete my post because it is factual?
"The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia,"
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
A simple appeal to ignorance (of the law).
Only in right wing cognitive disconnect can anyone be unconnected with the militia, only with militia service, well regulated.
I really like you making value judgments of people you've never met.
The M1 Rifle was, according to General George Patton, the greatest battle instrument ever devised. Those weapons, like the .30 carbine, bolt actions, and the .45 acp pistol are sold by the government to the public.
Many people own that genre of rifle and some like the M1a which is the modern civilian version of the M14. Those of us who like that genre of weapons are more pro-gun than even the guys who are only into the AR family of weapons. But, to accuse me of being on the darker side of anything says that you are uneducated, ignorant, and prejudicial to the point that you cannot say anything that would benefit this thread.
Stereotyping cannot change the fact that most of the gun laws you support are designed as infringements to the Right, and consequently, unconstitutional. The M1a is the last wood and steel rifle that the militia uses. The M1a is superior to the AR in a number of ways,
You're a dumbass. I'm not appealing to the law. The law is the law. I'm appealing to the posters. You're arguing with the United States Supreme Court. Did it ever dawn on you that you might be freaking delusional? You would be well advised to give it some thought.
There are a lot of people who own firearms and are not active in the militia. The weapons and the Rights of the people are protected from infringements.
Not even the Judicature is immune, as a privilege, from political influence.
Nothing but repeal instead of a valid argument, means I win, by default.
This was established as federal doctrine, with the ratification of our federal Constitution:
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
I quoted your link. :SHRUG:
Private militias are not recognized by the govt, state or federal.
By having a group and calling it/claiming it to be a militia, whether on private/public land, doesn't matter.
So what if they are not recognized? They don't need to be recognized.
They are not illegal in every state as you claim are they?
So you do use Heller and the Supreme Court when they fit your narrative, yet condemn them when they don't, how idiotic of you. SMFH
Calling your group/club meetings a militia is hilarious, when all they are is a group of wanna-bes, doesn't make them a militia, or a Constitutional Militia as Humorme likes to call his defunct group, the Militia of Georgia. :SHRUG:
Separate names with a comma.