Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And you blame the guns. That's your problem. You don't think. Regardless of what happens in Las Vegas, or anywhere else, the fact remains that there is a city with a large number of firearms and no murders in a 25 year period. Proof that guns are not the problem. You lose.Nevada is "gun state USA " and look what happened .
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
And you blame the guns. That's your problem. You don't think. Regardless of what happens in Las Vegas, or anywhere else, the fact remains that there is a city with a large number of firearms and no murders in a 25 year period. Proof that guns are not the problem. You lose.Nevada is "gun state USA " and look what happened .
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
And you blame the guns. That's your problem. You don't think. Regardless of what happens in Las Vegas, or anywhere else, the fact remains that there is a city with a large number of firearms and no murders in a 25 year period. Proof that guns are not the problem. You lose.Nevada is "gun state USA " and look what happened .
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
Like splitting hairs, do ya? Naturally, people who can't afford one, or people cinvicted of felonies are exampt. DUH!And you blame the guns. That's your problem. You don't think. Regardless of what happens in Las Vegas, or anywhere else, the fact remains that there is a city with a large number of firearms and no murders in a 25 year period. Proof that guns are not the problem. You lose.Nevada is "gun state USA " and look what happened .
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
The law itself.
Municode Library
Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
Like splitting hairs, do ya? Naturally, people who can't afford one, or people cinvicted of felonies are exampt. DUH!And you blame the guns. That's your problem. You don't think. Regardless of what happens in Las Vegas, or anywhere else, the fact remains that there is a city with a large number of firearms and no murders in a 25 year period. Proof that guns are not the problem. You lose.Nevada is "gun state USA " and look what happened .
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
The law itself.
Municode Library
Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
And you blame the guns. That's your problem. You don't think. Regardless of what happens in Las Vegas, or anywhere else, the fact remains that there is a city with a large number of firearms and no murders in a 25 year period. Proof that guns are not the problem. You lose.Nevada is "gun state USA " and look what happened .
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
The law itself.
Municode Library
Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
Like splitting hairs, do ya? Naturally, people who can't afford one, or people cinvicted of felonies are exampt. DUH! Besides, anyway you look at it, that's a LOT of guns. And not one single murder in 25 years.
And you blame the guns. That's your problem. You don't think. Regardless of what happens in Las Vegas, or anywhere else, the fact remains that there is a city with a large number of firearms and no murders in a 25 year period. Proof that guns are not the problem. You lose.
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
The law itself.
Municode Library
Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
Like splitting hairs, do ya? Naturally, people who can't afford one, or people cinvicted of felonies are exampt. DUH! Besides, anyway you look at it, that's a LOT of guns. And not one single murder in 25 years.
And you blame the guns. That's your problem. You don't think. Regardless of what happens in Las Vegas, or anywhere else, the fact remains that there is a city with a large number of firearms and no murders in a 25 year period. Proof that guns are not the problem. You lose.
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
The law itself.
Municode Library
Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
Like splitting hairs, do ya? Naturally, people who can't afford one, or people cinvicted of felonies are exampt. DUH! Besides, anyway you look at it, that's a LOT of guns. And not one single murder in 25 years.
It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
The law itself.
Municode Library
Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
Like splitting hairs, do ya? Naturally, people who can't afford one, or people cinvicted of felonies are exampt. DUH! Besides, anyway you look at it, that's a LOT of guns. And not one single murder in 25 years.
I post just fine. The website isn't cooperating. And you're an idiot. Goodbye. You're banned.It's a small city with less than 50k people. Also, it's not required that every head of household have a gun.
From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
The law itself.
Municode Library
Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
Like splitting hairs, do ya? Naturally, people who can't afford one, or people cinvicted of felonies are exampt. DUH! Besides, anyway you look at it, that's a LOT of guns. And not one single murder in 25 years.
You no post so good.
I post just fine. The website isn't cooperating. And you're an idiot. Goodbye. You're banned.From the article
"In March 1982, 25 years ago, the small town of Kennesaw – responding to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Ill. – unanimously passed an ordinance requiring each head of household to own and maintain a gun."
Do you have credible evidence to refute this?
The law itself.
Municode Library
Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
Like splitting hairs, do ya? Naturally, people who can't afford one, or people cinvicted of felonies are exampt. DUH! Besides, anyway you look at it, that's a LOT of guns. And not one single murder in 25 years.
You no post so good.
what does that prove fenton? does it prove guns cause crime1,516 mass shootings in 1,735 days: America's gun crisis – in one chartHere it is, folks. PROOF that guns do not cause crime. Read it and weep, you liberal gun grabbing scumbags.
25 years murder-free in ‘Gun Town USA’
It proves he's an ignoramous.what does that prove fenton? does it prove guns cause crime1,516 mass shootings in 1,735 days: America's gun crisis – in one chartHere it is, folks. PROOF that guns do not cause crime. Read it and weep, you liberal gun grabbing scumbags.
25 years murder-free in ‘Gun Town USA’
fentons ok...its just ya got one poster claiming that liberals are not claiming guns cause crime and then right on top of that poster you have a liberal offering up a chart in the hopes of fooling folks into believing they do cause crime.It proves he's an ignoramous.what does that prove fenton? does it prove guns cause crime1,516 mass shootings in 1,735 days: America's gun crisis – in one chartHere it is, folks. PROOF that guns do not cause crime. Read it and weep, you liberal gun grabbing scumbags.
25 years murder-free in ‘Gun Town USA’
It proves he's an ignoramous.what does that prove fenton? does it prove guns cause crime1,516 mass shootings in 1,735 days: America's gun crisis – in one chartHere it is, folks. PROOF that guns do not cause crime. Read it and weep, you liberal gun grabbing scumbags.
25 years murder-free in ‘Gun Town USA’
Liberal logic.fentons ok...its just ya got one poster claiming that liberals are not claiming guns cause crime and then right on top of that poster you have a liberal offering up a chart in the hopes of fooling folks into believing they do cause crime.It proves he's an ignoramous.what does that prove fenton? does it prove guns cause crime1,516 mass shootings in 1,735 days: America's gun crisis – in one chartHere it is, folks. PROOF that guns do not cause crime. Read it and weep, you liberal gun grabbing scumbags.
25 years murder-free in ‘Gun Town USA’
