213 Thousand Jobs Added Last Month

Not according to the criteria you've used.

dear, it may be over you head but Reagan more than anyone fought and eventually destroyed liberal communism while our liberals spied for Stalin and elected Obama. Conservatives are for very limited govt but not for a limited military. Too subtle for you?
And yet, in the real world, it was Glasnost, and more notably Perestroika, which destroyed the Soviet Union.
Exactly. Reagan gets credit for accepting their failure. Big whoop.
 
Dubya Bush is the most conservative president in U.S. history. Fact.

That post clearly indicates you have no idea what a conservative is.

But you do know this....Ds good....Rs bad....duh....
Name all the presidents who were more conservative than Dubya.

Good luck with that.

And if you say Reagan, you are uninformed or delusional. Reagan did talk a better conservative game than Dubya, I'll give him that. But actions speak louder than words.

W was a progressive like you. Why do you disown him?

He expanded government, which you like very much.

He waged war, which you like very much.

He kept the borders open, which you like very much.

He grew the national debt to keep the welfare/warfare state going, which you like very much.

He enlarged the national security state, which you like very much.
You just described Ronald Reagan's presidency. Congratulations!

No silly...it describes very president since Coolidge, which should make you progressives very happy.
 
Not according to the criteria you've used.

dear, it may be over you head but Reagan more than anyone fought and eventually destroyed liberal communism while our liberals spied for Stalin and elected Obama. Conservatives are for very limited govt but not for a limited military. Too subtle for you?
And yet, in the real world, it was Glasnost, and more notably Perestroika, which destroyed the Soviet Union.

dear, the Soviets could have become Nazis or Fascists or Rastafarians, but they chose Republican capitalism because it was obviously the most successful system in human history! Liberals spied for Stalin, gave him the bomb, and elected Obama. If liberalism and liberal detente had progressed here the USSR, Red China, and the USA would now all be liberal communist with 20% of our current standard of living.

Please ask question about what you cant understand.
 
Not according to the criteria you've used.

dear, it may be over you head but Reagan more than anyone fought and eventually destroyed liberal communism while our liberals spied for Stalin and elected Obama. Conservatives are for very limited govt but not for a limited military. Too subtle for you?
And yet, in the real world, it was Glasnost, and more notably Perestroika, which destroyed the Soviet Union.

dear, the Soviets could have become Nazis or Fascists or Rastafarians, but they chose Republican capitalism because it was obviously the most successful system in human history! Liberals spied for Stalin, gave him the bomb, and elected Obama. If liberalism and liberal detente had progressed here the USSR, Red China, and the USA would now all be liberal communist with 20% of our current standard of living.

Please ask question about what you cant understand.
Riiight, they learned about Republican capitalism by watching Republicans lead the world into economic despair, starting in 1929.
 
jk
Not according to the criteria you've used.

dear, it may be over you head but Reagan more than anyone fought and eventually destroyed liberal communism while our liberals spied for Stalin and elected Obama. Conservatives are for very limited govt but not for a limited military. Too subtle for you?
And yet, in the real world, it was Glasnost, and more notably Perestroika, which destroyed the Soviet Union.

dear, the Soviets could have become Nazis or Fascists or Rastafarians, but they chose Republican capitalism because it was obviously the most successful system in human history! Liberals spied for Stalin, gave him the bomb, and elected Obama. If liberalism and liberal detente had progressed here the USSR, Red China, and the USA would now all be liberal communist with 20% of our current standard of living.

Please ask question about what you cant understand.
Riiight, they learned about Republican capitalism by watching Republicans lead the world into economic despair, starting in 1929.

too 100% stupid as always. In 1929 Hoover a liberal was president!!
 
jk
Not according to the criteria you've used.

dear, it may be over you head but Reagan more than anyone fought and eventually destroyed liberal communism while our liberals spied for Stalin and elected Obama. Conservatives are for very limited govt but not for a limited military. Too subtle for you?
And yet, in the real world, it was Glasnost, and more notably Perestroika, which destroyed the Soviet Union.

dear, the Soviets could have become Nazis or Fascists or Rastafarians, but they chose Republican capitalism because it was obviously the most successful system in human history! Liberals spied for Stalin, gave him the bomb, and elected Obama. If liberalism and liberal detente had progressed here the USSR, Red China, and the USA would now all be liberal communist with 20% of our current standard of living.

Please ask question about what you cant understand.
Riiight, they learned about Republican capitalism by watching Republicans lead the world into economic despair, starting in 1929.

too 100% stupid as always. In 1929 Hoover a liberal was president!!
Seems your definition for Liberal includes Conservatives who fucked this nation. That doesn't make them Liberal, it just makes Conservatism a fantasy.
 
Seems your definition for Liberal includes Conservatives who fucked this nation. That doesn't make them Liberal, it just makes Conservatism a fantasy.

dear , ever heard of the Hoover Dam stimulus project?

... the Hoover interventions include: expanded public works( ever heard of Hoover dam), greater government control over agriculture, the Smoot-Hawley tariff, a virtual end to immigration, government loans for construction and other businesses ... Most important was Hoover’s pressuring businesses to not cut wages even as the prices of their output fell. The result was higher real wages, which were responsible for the unemployment rate topping out at 25 percent, causing the greatest human toll of the Great Depression. [1]Hoover, much like FDR, was skeptical about free markets

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
 
Seems your definition for Liberal includes Conservatives who fucked this nation. That doesn't make them Liberal, it just makes Conservatism a fantasy.

dear , ever heard of the Hoover Dam stimulus project?

... the Hoover interventions include: expanded public works( ever heard of Hoover dam), greater government control over agriculture, the Smoot-Hawley tariff, a virtual end to immigration, government loans for construction and other businesses ... Most important was Hoover’s pressuring businesses to not cut wages even as the prices of their output fell. The result was higher real wages, which were responsible for the unemployment rate topping out at 25 percent, causing the greatest human toll of the Great Depression. [1]Hoover, much like FDR, was skeptical about free markets

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Cries the idiot who calls Reagan a Conservative even though he raised taxes, raised spending, raised the deficit, raised the debt, and gave amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

Again, you call successful presidents Conservative and failed presidents Liberal, regardless of their political party and regardless of their policies. That's why Conservative is a fantasy. It's like a pile of shit that you can mold into anything you like.
 
That's why Conservative is a fantasy.

dear, how can it be a fantasy when we, thanks to our conservative Repubican Constitution, have a far more limited and conservative govt than Cuba, for example.

Do you see how I can state things so simply that even a liberal can understand them?
 
That's why Conservative is a fantasy.

dear, how can it be a fantasy when we, thanks to our conservative Repubican Constitution, have a far more limited and conservative govt than Cuba, for example.

Do you see how I can state things so simply that even a liberal can understand them?
I understand how you state things to reveal your psychosis. Like calling the Constitution, a "Conservative Republican Constitution." I guess you now think constitutionally mandating the government "provides for the general welfare of the nation," is either conservative or Republican?? :eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

You rightards say the darndest things. :bs1:
 
That's why Conservative is a fantasy.

dear, how can it be a fantasy when we, thanks to our conservative Repubican Constitution, have a far more limited and conservative govt than Cuba, for example.

Do you see how I can state things so simply that even a liberal can understand them?
I understand how you state things to reveal your psychosis. Like calling the Constitution, a "Conservative Republican Constitution." I guess you now think constitutionally mandating the government "provides for the general welfare of the nation," is either conservative or Republican?? :eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

You rightards say the darndest things. :bs1:[/QUOTE

what does the general welfare clause mean to a liberal illiterate?
 
Seems your definition for Liberal includes Conservatives who fucked this nation. That doesn't make them Liberal, it just makes Conservatism a fantasy.

dear , ever heard of the Hoover Dam stimulus project?

... the Hoover interventions include: expanded public works( ever heard of Hoover dam), greater government control over agriculture, the Smoot-Hawley tariff, a virtual end to immigration, government loans for construction and other businesses ... Most important was Hoover’s pressuring businesses to not cut wages even as the prices of their output fell. The result was higher real wages, which were responsible for the unemployment rate topping out at 25 percent, causing the greatest human toll of the Great Depression. [1]Hoover, much like FDR, was skeptical about free markets

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Cries the idiot who calls Reagan a Conservative even though he raised taxes, raised spending, raised the deficit, raised the debt, and gave amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

Again, you call successful presidents Conservative and failed presidents Liberal, regardless of their political party and regardless of their policies. That's why Conservative is a fantasy. It's like a pile of shit that you can mold into anything you like.

dear Reagan conquered liberal communism while our liberals were spying for Stalin and electing Obama. Sorry, but left and right know him as Uber conservative. Only you lack the IQ to understand.
 
Seems your definition for Liberal includes Conservatives who fucked this nation. That doesn't make them Liberal, it just makes Conservatism a fantasy.

dear , ever heard of the Hoover Dam stimulus project?

... the Hoover interventions include: expanded public works( ever heard of Hoover dam), greater government control over agriculture, the Smoot-Hawley tariff, a virtual end to immigration, government loans for construction and other businesses ... Most important was Hoover’s pressuring businesses to not cut wages even as the prices of their output fell. The result was higher real wages, which were responsible for the unemployment rate topping out at 25 percent, causing the greatest human toll of the Great Depression. [1]Hoover, much like FDR, was skeptical about free markets

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Cries the idiot who calls Reagan a Conservative even though he raised taxes, raised spending, raised the deficit, raised the debt, and gave amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

Again, you call successful presidents Conservative and failed presidents Liberal, regardless of their political party and regardless of their policies. That's why Conservative is a fantasy. It's like a pile of shit that you can mold into anything you like.
Dear it seems like fantasy to a liberal illiterate who lacks iq to know that president is not govt and in fact country is run by
independents who flip flop trending center left. Now you know why so much of the hard left is so disappointed in Obama.

Simple basics but way over the head of liberals.
 
That's why Conservative is a fantasy.

dear, how can it be a fantasy when we, thanks to our conservative Repubican Constitution, have a far more limited and conservative govt than Cuba, for example.

Do you see how I can state things so simply that even a liberal can understand them?
I understand how you state things to reveal your psychosis. Like calling the Constitution, a "Conservative Republican Constitution." I guess you now think constitutionally mandating the government "provides for the general welfare of the nation," is either conservative or Republican?? :eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

You rightards say the darndest things. :bs1:[/QUOTE

what does the general welfare clause mean to a liberal illiterate?
This is a great example your postings, thanks. ... you say nothing at all :afro:
 
This is a great example your postings, thanks. ... you say nothing at all :afro:

dear, as a typical liberal illiterate you brought up the general welfare clause. I asked you what it meant to you but you were afraid to answer. What does your fear teach you?
 
I guess you now think constitutionally mandating the government "provides for the general welfare of the nation," is either conservative or Republican??

its extremely conservative given that it means to provide for the general welfare within the context of the the few and limited enumerated powers. But that is way way over a liberal illiterate's head- right?
 
Last edited:
Green is now cheaper than oil.

absolutely, I guess you have to be a liberal to know that?
Then why did you just say "very expensive green renewables"?
Dear, exactly what is green substitute for gasoline that is cheaper. The entire world wants to buy it when you let us in on the liberal secret.
You stated that Green energy was more expensive than fossil fuel.

You are wrong.
 
Green is now cheaper than oil.

absolutely, I guess you have to be a liberal to know that?
Then why did you just say "very expensive green renewables"?
Dear, exactly what is green substitute for gasoline that is cheaper. The entire world wants to buy it when you let us in on the liberal secret.
You stated that Green energy was more expensive than fossil fuel.

You are wrong.

for 3rd time:
Dear slow liberal, exactly what is green substitute for gasoline that is cheaper. The entire world wants to buy it when you let us in on the great liberal secret.

See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance.
 

Forum List

Back
Top