2017 Co2 watch thread--How high will it go?

[mamooth]

I'm not following your rant. You're not following your rant. Why don't we call it quits.. Every I wrote, you haven't touched.. Not wasting my time with your angry self.. Don't think you're ABLE to defend that "Global proxy study" that produced CO2 leading temperature "globally" out of the last ice age.. That's the discussion here. Not me..

The topic is that you plainly didn't read the paper, made up a load of nonsense about it, got caught, and tried to deflect unsuccessfully. But since that's been settled, let's move on. You claim to want to discuss science, let's discuss.

You say the proxy average could not have gotten an 0.3C resolution. On precisely what science and statistics do you base that claim? Make sure you don't confuse individual proxies with a proxy average, a point you've failed on already. And most importantly, give us something besides "Because I say so."