Old Rocks
Diamond Member
[ QUOTE=edthecynic;3214976]As was pointed out and highlighted so no one, not even you could miss, that confirmation of the accuracy of the ground station data and the models after the errors in the UAH data were corrected came from denier Christy himself.Don't you deniers ever get tired of lying?????
The ONLY thing from Connolley is the chart, which you can't rebut nor any of the other information I posted, so you get some non-scientific right wing whacko hack site to attack the man personally and you ignore everything else!
So here is a link to a paper co-authored by John Christy where he admits that when his and Spencer's errors are corrected, there is no discrepancy between Troposphere temps and surface temps:
Are you now going to attack Christy for admitting the truth you can't accept or rebut????
http://www.climatescience.gov/Librar...al-execsum.pdf
Previously reported discrepancies between the amount of warming
near the surface and higher in the atmosphere have been used to
challenge the reliability of climate models and the reality of human induced global warming. Specifically, surface data showed substantial
global-average warming, while early versions of satellite and radiosonde
data showed little or no warming above the surface. This significant
discrepancy no longer exists because errors in the satellite and
radiosonde data have been identified and corrected. New data sets
have also been developed that do not show such discrepancies. __________________
unfucking real! that is your proof??????? did you even read it? its a feel good kumbaya article about how climate models aren't as out of whack as they used to be. not totally inconsistent with data at all times and at all altitudes. thats five minutes out of my life that I can never get back.
that had zero to do with what you claimed
It clearly says Spencer and Christy's UAH data was what was out of whack and the models, the RSS and ground station data was accurate all along, never out of whack, but as a denier you got it completely backwards. No surprise there.
Just to repeat it so you get it this time, it was the UAH satellite data that deniers were using that was out of whack and now is not "as out of whack as it used to be" since Christy and Spencer's errors were corrected.
GET IT?????????????????
please give the chapter and line where it says anthing re
motely close to what you claim.[/QUOTE]
Ian, have you been drinking whatever it is that mdn drinks?