2005 will see the 2nd JFK in the White House

Psychoblues

Senior Member
Nov 30, 2003
2,701
142
48
North Missisippi
John Kerry is far superior to GWB in experience and intellect. He's genuine, honest and gentlemanly to boot. Even many of my friends that adamantly supported DK (not Suddeth), JD, WC and a few more are now quite pleased that the JFK is now the Democratic Party frontrunner. JE is still admired but most of us recognise that his wetness behing the ears is still a little evident. VP, maybe? Time will tell!!!! Even many of my GWB supporter acquaintances are very excited to see a genuine Democrat like JFK in the cat bird seat as far as the Democratic Party is concerned. They even remark that 2000 would have been quite different if such as JFK had been the nominee in that year. Personally, I agree with them, don't you?

I think this is a good day for America, the land that I love. I hope you do too!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Psychoblues needed this very good news and hopes that you all have as good a day as he is having!!!!!!!!!!
 
John Kerry epitomizes the contemporary democrat, full of evasive non-answers, pandering and hipocrisy. The first time I saw him speak two years ago, his smarmy slander, topped my list in all time lows of democratic party speakers over a dismal wandering speech from an unkempt and red-faced Ted Kennedy that I witnessed in D.C. six years ago. Neither character is worthy of what good has been done by the democratic party and their attempts to attach their pathetic agendas to the legend of JFK is just all the more poignant to displaying that all the democratic party has left is a bunch of fuming socialist dictator sympathizers. It is reasons like this that I have lost all faith in the democratic party.

When I listen to kerry speak, I am reminded of the suck-slurp sound that a resistant ketchup bottle makes. Lots of noise and aggravation, and nothing ever comes out of it.

More liberalism and less socialism, that's all I'm asking. :)
 
I suppose you have a reliable source for that remark. "Hillary isn't running"?

She's running for the betterment and advancement of the Democratic Party. She's never expressed any interest whatsoever in seeking the CIC seat. But she's running, organizing, increasing the political/public awareness of Republican atrocities against the peoples they promise to swap votes for but fail to deliver on their promises, you can bet your ass on that, my friend. She ain't preaching to the choir, she's demonstrating to the public. Be that as it is, Psychoblues is one happy dude today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Campaigns are by design "pandering", nbdysfu. Many of us pay attention to the attitude demonstrated and the record of the votes that are cast in our legislatures. JFK has a good record considering his campaign claims. I can't say the same about the average or even not so average Republican. But, I'm still reading.
 
Originally posted by Psychoblues
I suppose you have a reliable source for that remark. "Hillary isn't running"?

Have you seen Hillary on the campaign trail running for President? I haven't. She hasn't announced her candidacy. Thus, I think I am safe in making the statement that "Hillary isn't running."
 
Originally posted by Psychoblues
She's running for the betterment and advancement of the Democratic Party. She's never expressed any interest whatsoever in seeking the CIC seat. But she's running, organizing, increasing the political/public awareness of Republican atrocities against the peoples they promise to swap votes for but fail to deliver on their promises, you can bet your ass on that, my friend. She ain't preaching to the choir, she's demonstrating to the public. Be that as it is, Psychoblues is one happy dude today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

After you take your meds, ship some off to Hillary, you're both a bit cuckoo. :D
 
'Scuse me, gop_jeff, I forget, sometimes, the length that some will go to in order to obfuscate truth. I went a little further in that depiction that you quote and I suggest you do as well!!!!!!

Happy Day Are Here Again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Originally posted by Psychoblues
'Scuse me, gop_jeff, I forget, sometimes, the length that some will go to in order to obfuscate truth. I went a little further in that depiction that you quote and I suggest you do as well!!!!!!

Happy Day Are Here Again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry to burst your bubble here, but you're happy because your candidate is the best of the knuckleheads (Hint - that still leaves him as a knucklehead). This is like picking up 5 worms and deciding which one to eat.

I'm happy as long as you're happy though, enjoy it for what little time you can!
 
Hey, hey, hey, jimnyc!!!!! I don't do recreational "meds" as you might imply although I enjoy an occasional very legal beer about as often as I can!!!!!!!!!!! Even then, please don't harsh my buzz!!!!! I haven't had a lot to be enthusiastic about here lately but this is news that tends to give me some hope!!!!!!!!!! Can you dig it?
 
JFK will trounce GWB in 2004. 2004 will be the year for "don't tell me what you read, my friend, tell me what you KNOW!!!!". JFK knows a lot more than GWB and that is easily verified and demonstrated!!!!!!!!!!
 
Originally posted by Psychoblues
2004 will be the year for "don't tell me what you read, my friend, tell me what you KNOW!!!!".
__________________ ____________________

I know that the nazis appealed to aryan cultural supremacy and the burning of all books. They didn't wan't people to read either.
 
Isn't that ironic, nbdysfu? How our own press is so misqued and different from the presses from across our borders concerning this mess? I'm very glad that you brought that up, my friend!!!!!!
 
Originally posted by Psychoblues
'Scuse me, gop_jeff, I forget, sometimes, the length that some will go to in order to obfuscate truth. I went a little further in that depiction that you quote and I suggest you do as well!!!!!!

Happy Day Are Here Again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I have no need to comment on Hillary's current activities within the Democratic party (I'm assuming that's what you were talking about). In fact, I have commented on her main project - Wesley Clark - a few times. To be honest, I think the man sold his soul to the Clintons, and strikes me as extremely dishonest.

There's a question for you, Psycho: if you value the veteran angle so much, why aren't you on the Wesley Clark bandwagon?
 
Obviously, you do see a need to comment on HC but that's beside the point. Wasn't that your point? Getting beside the point?

WC is a genuine American hero. If he is nominated I will pledge my vote for him. JFK is, considering the time and definition of his service, an even greater American hero. But all the real heroes are dead and buried. But it is the "hero" aspect that appeals to so many of the unenlightened. Even yourself, gop_jeff, seems to aspire to the noun/adjective. JFK and WC are deserving of whatever accolades that the rest of us Americans are willing to bestow upon them. The presidency included.
 
Originally posted by Psychoblues
Ha, hahahahahahaha. You don't dig it at all, do you, gop_jeff? So sorry. I'll keep that in mind, can you dig it?

Let this be a lesson to everyone. This is what happens when you wear your tinfoil hat too tight.
 

Forum List

Back
Top