20,200 jobs lost in NJ in Sept, 9,400 in private sector. Thank you Chris Christie

[uscitizen]

One inescapable fact. Getting spending under control will cost many jobs.

 

[uscitizen]

Troll alert...

Again, the CON$ can't argue against the fact that Christie's policies are killing jobs so they stoop to personal attacks.
Thank you!

They can't accept the simple fact that government austerity, budget balancing, etc., whatever else it might be,

it's not a job creator. It's a job killer, because the government spending you're trying to eliminate is effectively funding dozens/hundreds/thousands of jobs.

If you want to make an argument for shrinking government and balancing the budget, fine, but don't insult our intelligence by claiming that it's some sort of economic stimulus.

Admit that it is what it is. PAIN.

THEN make your argument as to why the pain is worth it.

Bingo!

 

[The Rabbi]

New Jersey's employment picture took a turn for the worse in September with a loss of 20,200 jobs, 9,400 of them in the private sector, the NJ Department of Labor said in its monthly jobs report.

No wonder CON$ love this guy!

November 5, 2008
RUSH: I hope all your Joe the Plumbers are unemployed in six months! There.

October 31, 2008
RUSH:* Joe the Plumber.* Now, Joe the Plumber is an average citizen

Hey, EdtheCockSucker, how many jobs were lost in MA during that time? Oh yeah, Deval Patrick, Obama's butt buddy, is governor there, so we won't mention that.

 

[edthecynic]

In other words, there are less government jobs and less union jobs.

Which mean now we can have people employing themselves in other ways.

changing jobs isnt necessarily a bad thing.

9,400 of the lost jobs were PRIVATE sector jobs. But CON$ don't care how many private sector jobs are lost just so long as Christie busts the unions!

You sound just like Pelosi saying losing your job isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Thank you for again showing that, CON$ are just like Libs ....
Only MORE so!

Hey, HeadsInTheSeptic,
Christie was elected in November of '09, wasn't he?

This thread would be EVEN better if you could have accused him of axing jobs prior to his election!!!

Wow, would we Con$ have loved him even more.

An aside, glad to see you have a few different Rush quotes,...did it take much of your time away from pork rinds and Donkey Kong?

If I blamed the economy on Christie before he was elected that would make me a CON$ervative! And the 20,200 lost jobs were for the month of Sept 2010.

BTW, I've been using those two quotes of your MessiahRushie since Nov 2008.

Here's another LimpTard quote that suits your post to a tee blaming Obama for the failed Bush economy from the time Obama was nominated!

March 2, 2009
RUSH: Well, here's some truth for you. President Obama campaigned for two years. His policies were announced that long ago. He won the Democrat nomination last August, six months ago. Every smart money guy, every smart money woman on Wall Street and around the world knew Obama was a shoe-in to be president six months ago.

RUSH: To say that Obama has been in office only one month is not accurate from an effect on the world and an effect on the country standpoint. Barack Obama has been the controlling political authority on the economy for six months.

 

[Rozman]

Let's just keep doing stimulus spending that doesn't stimulate a gosh darn thing.Where are all those shovel ready jobs Mr. President?,where are those 500,000 jobs a month that were gonna be created Mr.Vice President?....Remember folks when Biden said that ! We better get used to the pain because this President doesn't have a clue how to get the economy moving again,if we have to suffer another 2 years before we can get someone who can we might as well get used to it why spend any more money that we just don't have.

 

[edthecynic]

But Obama's lost jobs in the past 2 years are Bush's fault, right??

Hey... just pointing out to EdTheCommie how he has directed blame away from Obama while instantly putting it on this Governor... a little disingenuous, dontchathink?

Obama didn't cancel the Tunnel Project which would have created 6,000 private sector jobs immediately building the thing and tens of thousands of future jobs once it was finished. In fact, Obama offered more money and guarantees that any cost overruns would be covered by a group of third party investors.

It was GOP partisan Christie who rejected the money and jobs so he could divert more than a billion dollars to his slush fund for his cronies. The goal of GOP governors is to keep unemployment high by rejecting infrastructure projects in order to make Obama a one term president.

He did a tremendous job canceling a project that was gonna strangle NJ's economy with guaranteed cost over runs that NJ was gonna be responsible for.The Feds were offering teaser loans to keep the project going but NJ was responsible to pay them back.

Yeh it was gonna provide jobs but the negative effect needed to be dealt with.NJ should get with the program as the rest of the country should pay attention to how this guy is trying to fix a government that hasa run amok with spending.

Good job Governor Christie......

Parroting Christie's lies does not make them true. NJ's costs were CAPPED at the original amount agreed to. Any and all cost overruns would not have cost NJ a single penny, either now or in the future!

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Wow... NYFarteneer actually argues that excessive government spending is a job creator?

Uh.... never mind. It ain't worth it.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

New Jersey's employment picture took a turn for the worse in September with a loss of 20,200 jobs, 9,400 of them in the private sector, the NJ Department of Labor said in its monthly jobs report.

No wonder CON$ love this guy!

November 5, 2008
RUSH: I hope all your Joe the Plumbers are unemployed in six months! There.

October 31, 2008
RUSH:* Joe the Plumber.* Now, Joe the Plumber is an average citizen

Hey, EdtheCockSucker, how many jobs were lost in MA during that time? Oh yeah, Deval Patrick, Obama's butt buddy, is governor there, so we won't mention that.

I'm still laughing over East shit and die in a fire, Motherfucker.

 

[PoliticalChic]

9,400 of the lost jobs were PRIVATE sector jobs. But CON$ don't care how many private sector jobs are lost just so long as Christie busts the unions!

You sound just like Pelosi saying losing your job isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Thank you for again showing that, CON$ are just like Libs ....
Only MORE so!

Hey, HeadsInTheSeptic,
Christie was elected in November of '09, wasn't he?

This thread would be EVEN better if you could have accused him of axing jobs prior to his election!!!

Wow, would we Con$ have loved him even more.

An aside, glad to see you have a few different Rush quotes,...did it take much of your time away from pork rinds and Donkey Kong?

If I blamed the economy on Christie before he was elected that would make me a CON$ervative! And the 20,200 lost jobs were for the month of Sept 2010.

BTW, I've been using those two quotes of your MessiahRushie since Nov 2008.

Here's another LimpTard quote that suits your post to a tee blaming Obama for the failed Bush economy from the time Obama was nominated!

March 2, 2009
RUSH: Well, here's some truth for you. President Obama campaigned for two years. His policies were announced that long ago. He won the Democrat nomination last August, six months ago. Every smart money guy, every smart money woman on Wall Street and around the world knew Obama was a shoe-in to be president six months ago.

RUSH: To say that Obama has been in office only one month is not accurate from an effect on the world and an effect on the country standpoint. Barack Obama has been the controlling political authority on the economy for six months.

I must let you in on a little secret, CrackedEggsInTheAttic...

it's not the Rushie quotes that makes me love your posts....its the 'Con$' thing...

it's because I spend the day diving through piles of hundreds, tossing twenties over my head to make a money-shower, and gloating about you in that cardboard box over there in Hooverville...

Tell me, does that make me a bad person?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Wow... NYFarteneer actually argues that excessive government spending is a job creator?

Uh.... never mind. It ain't worth it.

Feel free to prove me wrong.

Ask some people at a defense plant whether or not the government can create (or kill) jobs.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Again, the CON$ can't argue against the fact that Christie's policies are killing jobs so they stoop to personal attacks.
Thank you!

They can't accept the simple fact that government austerity, budget balancing, etc., whatever else it might be,

it's not a job creator. It's a job killer, because the government spending you're trying to eliminate is effectively funding dozens/hundreds/thousands of jobs.

If you want to make an argument for shrinking government and balancing the budget, fine, but don't insult our intelligence by claiming that it's some sort of economic stimulus.

Admit that it is what it is. PAIN.

THEN make your argument as to why the pain is worth it.

Bingo!

Not a conservative here will debate/discuss my points seriously here. And I've tried before.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Wow... NYFarteneer actually argues that excessive government spending is a job creator?

Uh.... never mind. It ain't worth it.

Feel free to prove me wrong.

Ask some people at a defense plant whether or not the government can create (or kill) jobs.

Well, if you are right, then we should have more jobs than we know what to do with right now given a $12,000,000,000,000 national debt.

Oh, that's right..... 40,000,000+ are unemployed.

There ya go Sparky.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

They can't accept the simple fact that government austerity, budget balancing, etc., whatever else it might be,

it's not a job creator. It's a job killer, because the government spending you're trying to eliminate is effectively funding dozens/hundreds/thousands of jobs.

If you want to make an argument for shrinking government and balancing the budget, fine, but don't insult our intelligence by claiming that it's some sort of economic stimulus.

Admit that it is what it is. PAIN.

THEN make your argument as to why the pain is worth it.

Bingo!

Not a conservative here will debate/discuss my points seriously here. And I've tried before.

That would be because... drum roll please......

They're not serious points.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Ask some people in the offshore oil industry if the Government can kill jobs.

 

[edthecynic]

Hey, HeadsInTheSeptic,
Christie was elected in November of '09, wasn't he?

This thread would be EVEN better if you could have accused him of axing jobs prior to his election!!!

Wow, would we Con$ have loved him even more.

An aside, glad to see you have a few different Rush quotes,...did it take much of your time away from pork rinds and Donkey Kong?

If I blamed the economy on Christie before he was elected that would make me a CON$ervative! And the 20,200 lost jobs were for the month of Sept 2010.

BTW, I've been using those two quotes of your MessiahRushie since Nov 2008.

Here's another LimpTard quote that suits your post to a tee blaming Obama for the failed Bush economy from the time Obama was nominated!

March 2, 2009
RUSH: Well, here's some truth for you. President Obama campaigned for two years. His policies were announced that long ago. He won the Democrat nomination last August, six months ago. Every smart money guy, every smart money woman on Wall Street and around the world knew Obama was a shoe-in to be president six months ago.

RUSH: To say that Obama has been in office only one month is not accurate from an effect on the world and an effect on the country standpoint. Barack Obama has been the controlling political authority on the economy for six months.

I must let you in on a little secret, CrackedEggsInTheAttic...

it's not the Rushie quotes that makes me love your posts....its the 'Con$' thing...

it's because I spend the day diving through piles of hundreds, tossing twenties over my head to make a money-shower, and gloating about you in that cardboard box over there in Hooverville...

Tell me, does that make me a bad person?

No it doesn't make you a bad person, it makes you a Bullshit Artist.

I love how CON$ pretend they are the achievers and Libs are the slackers when the fact is that Lib Families on the average are more financially successful than CON$. Rather than working harder to earn as much money as the "Limousine Liberals" that CON$ are so jealous of, CON$ simply declare themselves rolling in money while they sit on their lazy asses.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

If I blamed the economy on Christie before he was elected that would make me a CON$ervative! And the 20,200 lost jobs were for the month of Sept 2010.

BTW, I've been using those two quotes of your MessiahRushie since Nov 2008.

Here's another LimpTard quote that suits your post to a tee blaming Obama for the failed Bush economy from the time Obama was nominated!

March 2, 2009
RUSH: Well, here's some truth for you. President Obama campaigned for two years. His policies were announced that long ago. He won the Democrat nomination last August, six months ago. Every smart money guy, every smart money woman on Wall Street and around the world knew Obama was a shoe-in to be president six months ago.

RUSH: To say that Obama has been in office only one month is not accurate from an effect on the world and an effect on the country standpoint. Barack Obama has been the controlling political authority on the economy for six months.

I must let you in on a little secret, CrackedEggsInTheAttic...

it's not the Rushie quotes that makes me love your posts....its the 'Con$' thing...

it's because I spend the day diving through piles of hundreds, tossing twenties over my head to make a money-shower, and gloating about you in that cardboard box over there in Hooverville...

Tell me, does that make me a bad person?

No it doesn't make you a bad person, it makes you a Bullshit Artist.

I love how CON$ pretend they are the achievers and Libs are the slackers when the fact is that Lib Families on the average are more financially successful than CON$. Rather than working harder to earn as much money as the "Limousine Liberals" that CON$ are so jealous of, CON$ simply declare themselves rolling in money while they sit on their lazy asses.

Dude.. lay off the urinal cakes.

 

[edthecynic]

Ask some people in the offshore oil industry if the Government can kill jobs.

How dare the government impose safety standards so the oil industry does not kill more PEOPLE, after all, more people dying on the job creates more jobs for the living!

 

[PoliticalChic]

If I blamed the economy on Christie before he was elected that would make me a CON$ervative! And the 20,200 lost jobs were for the month of Sept 2010.

BTW, I've been using those two quotes of your MessiahRushie since Nov 2008.

Here's another LimpTard quote that suits your post to a tee blaming Obama for the failed Bush economy from the time Obama was nominated!

March 2, 2009
RUSH: Well, here's some truth for you. President Obama campaigned for two years. His policies were announced that long ago. He won the Democrat nomination last August, six months ago. Every smart money guy, every smart money woman on Wall Street and around the world knew Obama was a shoe-in to be president six months ago.

RUSH: To say that Obama has been in office only one month is not accurate from an effect on the world and an effect on the country standpoint. Barack Obama has been the controlling political authority on the economy for six months.

I must let you in on a little secret, CrackedEggsInTheAttic...

it's not the Rushie quotes that makes me love your posts....its the 'Con$' thing...

it's because I spend the day diving through piles of hundreds, tossing twenties over my head to make a money-shower, and gloating about you in that cardboard box over there in Hooverville...

Tell me, does that make me a bad person?

No it doesn't make you a bad person, it makes you a Bullshit Artist.

I love how CON$ pretend they are the achievers and Libs are the slackers when the fact is that Lib Families on the average are more financially successful than CON$. Rather than working harder to earn as much money as the "Limousine Liberals" that CON$ are so jealous of, CON$ simply declare themselves rolling in money while they sit on their lazy asses.

Now, see that EdEatsTheSpinach, you just loved that...but took it entirely too seriously.

But you bring up a good point, — Although liberal families’ incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).

1. Looking at the ten-year total of Biden’s giving, one percent would have been $24,500. One half of one percent would have been $12,250. One quarter of one percent would have been $6,125. And one eighth of one percent would have been $3,062 — just below what Biden actually contributed.

“The average American household gives about two percent of adjusted gross income,” says Arthur Brooks, the Syracuse University scholar, soon to take over as head of the American Enterprise Institute, who has done extensive research on American giving. “On average, [Biden] is not giving more than one tenth as much as the average American household, and that is evidence that he doesn’t share charitable values with the average American.” Byron York 9/15/08 NR

2. According to their tax returns, in 2006 and 2007, the Obamas gave 5.8 percent and 6.1 percent of their income to charity. I guess Michelle Obama has to draw the line someplace with all this "giving back" stuff. The Bidens gave 0.15 percent and 0.31 percent of the income to charity.

No wonder Obama doesn't see what the big fuss is over his decision to limit tax deductions for charitable giving. At least that part of Obama's tax plan won't affect his supporters.

Meanwhile, in 1991, 1992 and 1993, George W. Bush had incomes of $179,591, $212,313 and $610,772. His charitable contributions those years were $28,236, $31,914 and $31,292. During his presidency, Bush gave away more than 10 percent of his income each year.

For purposes of comparison, in 2005, Barack Obama made $1.7 million -- more than twice President Bush's 2005 income of $735,180 -- but they both gave about the same amount to charity.

That same year, the heartless Halliburton employee Vice President Dick Cheney gave 77 percent of his income to charity. The following year, in 2006, Bush gave more to charity than Obama on an income one-third smaller than Obama's. Maybe when Obama talks about "change" he's referring to his charitable contributions.

Liberals have no intention of actually parting with any of their own wealth or lifting a finger to help the poor. That's for other people to do with what's left of their incomes after the government has taken its increasingly large cut.

As the great liberal intellectual Bertrand Russell explained while scoffing at the idea that he would give his money to charity: "I'm afraid you've got it wrong. (We) are socialists. We don't pretend to be Christians." Ann Coulter



You guys just stingy, self-centered Scrooges?

What's the dillio?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Wow... NYFarteneer actually argues that excessive government spending is a job creator?

Uh.... never mind. It ain't worth it.

Feel free to prove me wrong.

Ask some people at a defense plant whether or not the government can create (or kill) jobs.

Well, if you are right, then we should have more jobs than we know what to do with right now given a $12,000,000,000,000 national debt.

Oh, that's right..... 40,000,000+ are unemployed.

There ya go Sparky.

So the government can't create a job at a defense plant?

If the government can't create jobs, why is Christie laying off people to save money?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Bingo!

Not a conservative here will debate/discuss my points seriously here. And I've tried before.

That would be because... drum roll please......

They're not serious points.

Proving my point. That's exactly the kind of dodge I get.

Let's put it this way. If cutting government spending was going to create thousands of jobs, and not ELIMINATE thousands of jobs, wouldn't the Republicans be out telling us what parts of government they wanted to cut,

and how many jobs would magically appear once the cuts were made?