19 of 21 legal experts say healthcare should stand

[Truthmatters]

Obama Health Law Seen Valid, Scholars Expect Rejection - Bloomberg



The U.S. Supreme Court should uphold a law requiring most Americans to have health insurance if the justices follow legal precedent, according to 19 of 21 constitutional law professors who ventured an opinion on the most-anticipated ruling in years.

Only eight of them predicted the court would do so.

 

[DiamondDave]

Lay a bet on it?? Say username given up and IP ban for the loser??

I'll keep throwing it out there to you, you lying troll

 

[NoNukes]

Right wingers will not respect law professors, this thread is a waste of time.

 

[Claudette]

Doesn't really matter what the "experts" say.

Its what the SC says that counts.

 

[Rozman]

Well they also said that Obama is supposed to be some sort of Constitutional scholar.
They also hand out Nobel prizes to anyone these days so it seems..
Well we are down to it here and will have to wait a bit more.

I'm sure if one was to dig around a bit we could find 19 of 21 that would offer that Obamacare
will be deemed unconstitutional...

So speculation is just something to keep us all busy I guess.

 

[Conservative]

Obama Health Law Seen Valid, Scholars Expect Rejection - Bloomberg



The U.S. Supreme Court should uphold a law requiring most Americans to have health insurance if the justices follow legal precedent, according to 19 of 21 constitutional law professors who ventured an opinion on the most-anticipated ruling in years.

Only eight of them predicted the court would do so.

learn to read your sources, dipshit...

Five of the 21 professors who responded, including Whitman, said the court is likely to strike down the coverage requirement. Underscoring the high stakes and complexity of the debate, eight described the outcome as a toss-up.

 

[asaratis]

Obama Health Law Seen Valid, Scholars Expect Rejection - Bloomberg



The U.S. Supreme Court should uphold a law requiring most Americans to have health insurance if the justices follow legal precedent, according to 19 of 21 constitutional law professors who ventured an opinion on the most-anticipated ruling in years.

Only eight of them predicted the court would do so.

19 say SCOTUS SHOULD
8 think SCOTUS WILL

11 must know that they have their own heads up their own asses.

Liberal scholars think they are more correct than SCOTUS can be.

Imagine that!

 

[Truthmatters]

Right wingers will not respect law professors, this thread is a waste of time.

Yes but it pretty interesting they believe it SHOULD stand on legal precidence but believe the scotus will strike it.


That is very telling

 

[GuyPinestra]

From the link...

Law schools included were: Columbia University; Duke University; Harvard University; New York University; Northwestern University; Stanford University; the University of California at Berkeley; the University of Chicago; the University of Michigan; the University of Pennsylvania; the University of Virginia, and Yale University.

Liberal bastions all...

 

[Truthmatters]

No its legal experts think this scotus is ......well.......special.

 

[Truthmatters]

First they GIVE Bush the election in 2000.

and now they deside everything in a neo con manner.

 

[Claudette]

Obama Health Law Seen Valid, Scholars Expect Rejection - Bloomberg



The U.S. Supreme Court should uphold a law requiring most Americans to have health insurance if the justices follow legal precedent, according to 19 of 21 constitutional law professors who ventured an opinion on the most-anticipated ruling in years.

Only eight of them predicted the court would do so.

learn to read your sources, dipshit...

Five of the 21 professors who responded, including Whitman, said the court is likely to strike down the coverage requirement. Underscoring the high stakes and complexity of the debate, eight described the outcome as a toss-up.

You know Splatters.

Only her "cold hard fact" mean anything. All she had to see was that 19 of 21 to uphold. Why would she bother to READ the article.??

She's such a derp.

 

[asaratis]

First they GIVE Bush the election in 2000.

and now they deside everything in a neo con manner.

They didn't give Bush shit! They stopped the stupid fuckin' recounts by Al Gore. Al would have recounted into the next century to win.

You are a stupid fuck!

 

[Bigfoot]

Obamacare is gonna burn, the majority opinion has already been written by the Chief Justice. It's over.

 

[Avatar4321]

Obama Health Law Seen Valid, Scholars Expect Rejection - Bloomberg



The U.S. Supreme Court should uphold a law requiring most Americans to have health insurance if the justices follow legal precedent, according to 19 of 21 constitutional law professors who ventured an opinion on the most-anticipated ruling in years.

Only eight of them predicted the court would do so.

19 say SCOTUS SHOULD
8 think SCOTUS WILL

11 must know that they have their own heads up their own asses.

Liberal scholars think they are more correct than SCOTUS can be.

Imagine that!

Some of them probably are. Maybe not on this, but in general. Heck any educated citizen could be more correct than the Supreme Court. They are just 9 men who were appointed by the President. They arne't gods. They aren't infalliable.

 

[The Infidel]

First they GIVE Bush the election in 2000.

and now they deside everything in a neo con manner.

You preparing for a loss ?

 

[Avatar4321]

First they GIVE Bush the election in 2000.

and now they deside everything in a neo con manner.

TM. At no point in the 2000 election did Al Gore have more votes in Florida than George Bush. The media even recounted the way Al Gore wanted it and Bush ended up with MORE votes not less.

Im sorry if you dont like the Constitution, but it is our National Covenant and the law of the land.

 

[Truthmatters]

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/08/u...me-court-in-new-poll.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all


Approval Rating for Justices Hits Just 44% in New Poll

By ADAM LIPTAK and ALLISON KOPICKI

Published: June 7, 2012 1080 Comments



WASHINGTON — Just 44 percent of Americans approve of the job the Supreme Court is doing and three-quarters say the justices’ decisions are sometimes influenced by their personal or political views, according to a poll conducted by The New York Times and CBS News.

 

[Bigfoot]

Turn out the lights, the parties over..

 

[TakeAStepBack]

They SHOULD uphold IF they follow legal precedent. Do you know what that means, derp?