1834 Hebron Massacre

1. Who do you think were revolting against Egyptian rule? Martians? They were the people of Palestine.

2. No the Jews left or were evicted as per the Jewish Virtual Library.

"The Romans then destroyed Jerusalem, annexed Judaea as a Roman province, and systematically drove the Jews from Palestine. After 73 AD, Hebrew history would only be the history of the Diaspora as the Jews and their world view spread over Africa, Asia, and Europe."
The Diaspora Jewish Virtual Library

3. The land was stolen by the European Jews with the help of the British.




The land was conquered by the British who turned control over to the LoN to administer. The LoN then decided to enact the Balfour Declaration and gave so much of the conquered land to the Jews for their National home. So the land was not stolen but acquired by force of arms and bequeathed to the Jews of the world.

WHY DO YOU POST RACIST LIES
 
A- There were no Palestinians, as neither the Ottomans or Arab invaders called it by that name.

B- The Jews were massacred and ethnically cleansed despite assurances by lying Muslim invaders. The same way Muslim animals give assurances today and then start slaughtering innocent people.

C- Evidence that despite many massacres and invasions, the Jews kept a presence, and always kept coming back.

D- Therefore the land belongs to the Jews.
I wouldn't open your mouth too soon,now who was it that EXTERMINATED THE CANAANITES,MOABITES,PHILISTINES,AND TRIED TO ELIMINATE THE PALESTINIANS........OVER 80,000 Massacared Since 1927..and continuing ....The Jews of Course.....Roudy if you continue to skate on thin ICE,you are heading for a COLD DUNKING. Ziomania at its devious best is thy post Roudy,devious at best.steve




The arab muslims of course, just look at Black September and the death camps in gaza
 
A- There were no Palestinians, as neither the Ottomans or Arab invaders called it by that name.

B- The Jews were massacred and ethnically cleansed despite assurances by lying Muslim invaders. The same way Muslim animals give assurances today and then start slaughtering innocent people.

C- Evidence that despite many massacres and invasions, the Jews kept a presence, and always kept coming back.

D- Therefore the land belongs to the Jews.

But but but don't you know, if the Israelis would just end the occupation, then the terrorism and violence would suddenly stop...I know that because the really smart people at the NY Times tells us every day, and we all know how smart they are.
Lets try it.......you could well be right but I personally believe in a free Palestine and free Israel......myself......but it could still work well if we disarmed both sides and the UN monitered sic ...steve




Right up until the arab muslims smuggled a weapon into Palestine and started shooting Jewish children. Then it would all kick of again and the UN would then place an embargo on Palestine and build a steel wall around them.
 
motivational_quote_it_is_better_to_be_absolutely_ridiculous_than_to_be_absolutely_boring.jpg

In Rude-eee's case he is both at the same time. A rare life skill. :cool:
 
1. Who do you think were revolting against Egyptian rule? Martians? They were the people of Palestine.

2. No the Jews left or were evicted as per the Jewish Virtual Library.

"The Romans then destroyed Jerusalem, annexed Judaea as a Roman province, and systematically drove the Jews from Palestine. After 73 AD, Hebrew history would only be the history of the Diaspora as the Jews and their world view spread over Africa, Asia, and Europe."
The Diaspora Jewish Virtual Library

3. The land was stolen by the European Jews with the help of the British.




The land was conquered by the British who turned control over to the LoN to administer. The LoN then decided to enact the Balfour Declaration and gave so much of the conquered land to the Jews for their National home. So the land was not stolen but acquired by force of arms and bequeathed to the Jews of the world.

WHY DO YOU POST RACIST LIES

Nowhere in any act, did the LoN "give the land" to the Jews. The LoN entrusted Britain, as the Mandatory, to administer the provisional state of Palestine for the people of Palestine, which in 1922 consisted of 700,000 Christans and Muslims and 70,000 Jews at most, so that the country could go from a provisional state to a state like the other states that had been Ottoman territories, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, etc. As the Mandatory stated and reassured the majority population, , there was absolutely no intention of creating a Jewish state at the expense of the Christians and Muslims.

"7. Mr. Churchill has derived the impression from his interviews with your Delegation that it is not so much the policy itself, as defined in the preceding paragraph, that arouses misgiving, as the unfounded apprehension that the policy will not in practice follow the lines indicated. However this may be, he fully realises that the non-Jewish population of Palestine are entitled to claim from the Mandatory not only assurances but adequate safeguards that the establishment of the National Home, and the consequent Jewish immigration, shall not be conducted in such a manner as to prejudice their civil or religious rights."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

The Muslims and Christians were either massacred, ethnically cleansed and/or had their land stolen by the European colonists, hence, their civil rights were definitely prejudiced contrary to the terms of the Covenant of the League of Nations (article 22) and the Mandate itself. Essentially, Britain promoted a European colonial project at the expense of the Muslims and Christians of Palestine and to the benefit of European colonists. A criminal act
 
Yada yada yada.

Maybe if the Arab savages wouldn't have attacked the Jews, as they usually do, a civil war between the Jews and Arabs would not have erupted, in which the Jews won.
 
1. Who do you think were revolting against Egyptian rule? Martians? They were the people of Palestine.

2. No the Jews left or were evicted as per the Jewish Virtual Library.

"The Romans then destroyed Jerusalem, annexed Judaea as a Roman province, and systematically drove the Jews from Palestine. After 73 AD, Hebrew history would only be the history of the Diaspora as the Jews and their world view spread over Africa, Asia, and Europe."
The Diaspora Jewish Virtual Library

3. The land was stolen by the European Jews with the help of the British.




The land was conquered by the British who turned control over to the LoN to administer. The LoN then decided to enact the Balfour Declaration and gave so much of the conquered land to the Jews for their National home. So the land was not stolen but acquired by force of arms and bequeathed to the Jews of the world.

WHY DO YOU POST RACIST LIES

Nowhere in any act, did the LoN "give the land" to the Jews. The LoN entrusted Britain, as the Mandatory, to administer the provisional state of Palestine for the people of Palestine, which in 1922 consisted of 700,000 Christans and Muslims and 70,000 Jews at most, so that the country could go from a provisional state to a state like the other states that had been Ottoman territories, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, etc. As the Mandatory stated and reassured the majority population, , there was absolutely no intention of creating a Jewish state at the expense of the Christians and Muslims.

"7. Mr. Churchill has derived the impression from his interviews with your Delegation that it is not so much the policy itself, as defined in the preceding paragraph, that arouses misgiving, as the unfounded apprehension that the policy will not in practice follow the lines indicated. However this may be, he fully realises that the non-Jewish population of Palestine are entitled to claim from the Mandatory not only assurances but adequate safeguards that the establishment of the National Home, and the consequent Jewish immigration, shall not be conducted in such a manner as to prejudice their civil or religious rights."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

The Muslims and Christians were either massacred, ethnically cleansed and/or had their land stolen by the European colonists, hence, their civil rights were definitely prejudiced contrary to the terms of the Covenant of the League of Nations (article 22) and the Mandate itself. Essentially, Britain promoted a European colonial project at the expense of the Muslims and Christians of Palestine and to the benefit of European colonists. A criminal act





READ THE MANDATE FOR PALESTINE AGAIN abdul
 

Forum List

Back
Top