17??? 17???? That's A Lie!!!

[PoliticalChic]

....there were only three......and of them.....only one was in charge of the message!!!!!


"A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020"
A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020





Oh....wait....I confused that with one of the other lies they told us.....

–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.


Then we learned that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




OK...so it's a couple dozen of the liars on board so far.....

It is so hard to keep up with the lies ...

 

[PoliticalChic]

And.....an homage to those who clung to the Democrat lie for 675 days, believed every one of 'em.....right up to Friday....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every time we on the Right tell you, warn you.....and you go with wish-fulfillment rather than facts.......this happens.



"Trump Russia Collusion Treason Was All Just Another Elite Lie

The Mueller report dropped and the liberal elite experienced the kind of intense, agonizing disappointment....

... remember exactly what nonsense the elite liars were trying to stuff down our throats, because in the aftermath of their humiliation they are busy trying to hide it ...

Those of us who are neither shameless liars nor blithering idiots – or, such as my congressjerk Ted Lieu, both – never bought into this transparently ridiculous notion."
Trump Russia Collusion Treason Was All Just Another Elite Lie

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Biggest Mueller Report Takeaway: Don’t Trust Democrats

...Trump’s repeated claims of a “witch hunt” appear to have been correct. Democrats and their mainstream media sycophants wailed for months that they had evidence showing Trump colluded with Russia—all the while ignoring the evidence that Hillary Clinton likely colluded with at least one foreign government. They were wrong.

...Democrats knew there was very little evidence pointing toward collusion,...

....Democrats lied to you, and they would do it all over again if they could, because congressional Democrats don’t care about anything except winning elections."
Biggest Mueller Report Takeaway: Don’t Trust Democrats





Now.....isn't that exactly what I posted?
Lies are their way of life.

It is essential to recognize that the word has 'lie' has two different meaning to the Left and to the Right.
When applied to the Right, it is taken as an insult, to be responded to, to be proven incorrect.
To the Left it is to be shrugged at, an acceptable mode of debate.
They don't care if they are known to be liars. You'll see that time and again in their posts.

 

[PoliticalChic]

All aboard the Schadenfreude Express!!!!

Next stop, the 2020 elections!

 

[MisterBeale]

From your link;

"Mikhail Zygar, the founding editor of Russia's only independent TV network, Dozhd, told MSNBC on June 21, 2017 that his journalistic works suggests that the hackers are likely someone with affiliations with Russia but not the government itself (and not at their direction)."

Did these journalists analysis the original hacks/leaks? How are they qualified to make that assessment?

Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack

U.S. Intelligence Veterans Believe the 'Russian Hack' of DNC Computers May Have Been an Inside Job

Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence - Antiwar.com Blog

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity - Wikipedia

Publications of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

 

[The Original Tree]

Let's not forget where this actually all started, and when the Left put their Collusion Narrative in to High Gear, and tried to convert a political smear based in Russian Propaganda, in to a COUP.

Revenge Politics...

 

[Toronado3800]

....there were only three......and of them.....only one was in charge of the message!!!!!


"A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020"
A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020





Oh....wait....I confused that with one of the other lies they told us.....

–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.


Then we learned that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




OK...so it's a couple dozen of the liars on board so far.....

It is so hard to keep up with the lies ...

Are you saying the CIA, FBI and NSA can't be trusted?

Is that the purpose of this post that halfway into a term in office Trump has an incompetent intelligence soup of letters?

 

[william the wie]

Worse yet (for the Ds) the housing market is softening. It is softening most in the most left wing states.

 

[night_son]

....there were only three......and of them.....only one was in charge of the message!!!!!


"A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020"
A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020





Oh....wait....I confused that with one of the other lies they told us.....

–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.


Then we learned that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




OK...so it's a couple dozen of the liars on board so far.....

It is so hard to keep up with the lies ...

Great post. Unfortunately, however, we on the Right side of humanity and human history extending into our protean past, have achieved but a small respite in stemming the Red Tides rising. Our side . . . we are running out of "fingers" useable to plug holes in the dam that can hold back the flood of inhumanity, madness and insanity; that deluge coming of those who seek a new dark age and the fall of modern Western civilization. So the question then becomes: can the radical Left's monolithic push for the end of civilized mankind be prevented or have we all already gone over that edge? Still seems like for every one step back from that precipice, we lose two steps going forward.

 

[MisterBeale]

....there were only three......and of them.....only one was in charge of the message!!!!!


"A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020"
A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020





Oh....wait....I confused that with one of the other lies they told us.....

–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.


Then we learned that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




OK...so it's a couple dozen of the liars on board so far.....

It is so hard to keep up with the lies ...

Are you saying the CIA, FBI and NSA can't be trusted?

Is that the purpose of this post that halfway into a term in office Trump has an incompetent intelligence soup of letters?

Of course they can not be trusted. . . .

 

[Dick Foster]

....there were only three......and of them.....only one was in charge of the message!!!!!


"A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020"
A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020





Oh....wait....I confused that with one of the other lies they told us.....

–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.


Then we learned that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




OK...so it's a couple dozen of the liars on board so far.....

It is so hard to keep up with the lies ...

Are you saying the CIA, FBI and NSA can't be trusted?

Is that the purpose of this post that halfway into a term in office Trump has an incompetent intelligence soup of letters?

Exactly. Has it taken this long for you to reach that conclusion. I wized up way back in the sixties and seventies while I was in Vietnam and SEA. Consequenty, I was on to them before I was even old enough or able to vote.

 

[justoffal]

....there were only three......and of them.....only one was in charge of the message!!!!!


"A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020"
A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020





Oh....wait....I confused that with one of the other lies they told us.....

–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.


Then we learned that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




OK...so it's a couple dozen of the liars on board so far.....

It is so hard to keep up with the lies ...

Great post. Unfortunately, however, we on the Right side of humanity and human history extending into our protean past, have achieved but a small respite in stemming the Red Tides rising. Our side . . . we are running out of "fingers" useable to plug holes in the dam that can hold back the flood of inhumanity, madness and insanity; that deluge coming of those who seek a new dark age and the fall of modern Western civilization. So the question then becomes: can the radical Left's monolithic push for the end of civilized mankind be prevented or have we all already gone over that edge? Still seems like for every one step back from that precipice, we lose two steps going forward.

You are correct.... This degradation is as inevitable as the gravity pull from a black hole. The race to the lowest common denominator cannot be reversed nor can it be called off....

Jo

 

[PoliticalChic]

From your link;

"Mikhail Zygar, the founding editor of Russia's only independent TV network, Dozhd, told MSNBC on June 21, 2017 that his journalistic works suggests that the hackers are likely someone with affiliations with Russia but not the government itself (and not at their direction)."

Did these journalists analysis the original hacks/leaks? How are they qualified to make that assessment?

Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack

U.S. Intelligence Veterans Believe the 'Russian Hack' of DNC Computers May Have Been an Inside Job

Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence - Antiwar.com Blog

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity - Wikipedia

Publications of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

. This summary from the Leftwing Slate:
”.... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. “
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust

 

[Marion Morrison]

All aboard the Schadenfreude Express!!!!

Next stop, the 2020 elections!

The Schadenfreude is Yuge today! I'm watching "The View".

They're referring to talking head #1 NPC for a lot.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's not forget where this actually all started, and when the Left put their Collusion Narrative in to High Gear, and tried to convert a political smear based in Russian Propaganda, in to a COUP.

Revenge Politics...

Beg to differ, Tree


Follow the money


….."Russian Collusion"….Hillary's tale, picked up by her colleagues in the sale of American uranium to Russia for $ millions in bribes…er, 'donations.'

…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.

....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....

The reason for the Mueller Investigation?
....to camouflage the fact that every major Democrat elite was both knowledgeable and a participant in the corruption of the uranium deal: Muller, Comey and Rosenstein knew and probably wet their beaks in the payoffs.







They took what didn't belong to them....sold the purloined property of the American people.....and now need to hide the dirty deed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....there were only three......and of them.....only one was in charge of the message!!!!!


"A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020"
A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020





Oh....wait....I confused that with one of the other lies they told us.....

–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.


Then we learned that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




OK...so it's a couple dozen of the liars on board so far.....

It is so hard to keep up with the lies ...

Are you saying the CIA, FBI and NSA can't be trusted?

Is that the purpose of this post that halfway into a term in office Trump has an incompetent intelligence soup of letters?

What sort of moron are you.....everyone but you now knows that they can't be trusted.

 

[iceberg]

From your link;

"Mikhail Zygar, the founding editor of Russia's only independent TV network, Dozhd, told MSNBC on June 21, 2017 that his journalistic works suggests that the hackers are likely someone with affiliations with Russia but not the government itself (and not at their direction)."

Did these journalists analysis the original hacks/leaks? How are they qualified to make that assessment?

Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack

U.S. Intelligence Veterans Believe the 'Russian Hack' of DNC Computers May Have Been an Inside Job

Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence - Antiwar.com Blog

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity - Wikipedia

Publications of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

lots of valid questions.

you'd think the DNC would have allowed it to be reviewed. ask them why not. far as i'm concerned their not allowing it tells me all i need to know.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....there were only three......and of them.....only one was in charge of the message!!!!!


"A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020"
A crowded field: Here's a list of 17 Democrats likely running for president in 2020





Oh....wait....I confused that with one of the other lies they told us.....

–We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.


Then we learned that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.
Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




OK...so it's a couple dozen of the liars on board so far.....

It is so hard to keep up with the lies ...

Great post. Unfortunately, however, we on the Right side of humanity and human history extending into our protean past, have achieved but a small respite in stemming the Red Tides rising. Our side . . . we are running out of "fingers" useable to plug holes in the dam that can hold back the flood of inhumanity, madness and insanity; that deluge coming of those who seek a new dark age and the fall of modern Western civilization. So the question then becomes: can the radical Left's monolithic push for the end of civilized mankind be prevented or have we all already gone over that edge? Still seems like for every one step back from that precipice, we lose two steps going forward.

I'm not optimistic on this score.

Between the Democrats and the weak sister Republicans, we don't have a side.



For me, I believe that each of us has within us the seeds of our own destruction, and this applies to Western Civilization as well. The Democrats are those seeds, and they're willing to take all of us down with them.


We're simply basking in the afterglow of a once great civilization. Atavism is on the rise.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Harmeet K. Dhillon

✔@pnjaban
Replying to @brithume

Adam Schiff, John Brennan, Beto O'Rourke, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Jerry Nadler, Maxine Waters, all of CNN, all of MSNBC, all of the Washington Post staff, all of the New York Times staff.... Time to eat crow and try to recover from the total humiliation of this moment.




Michelle Malkin

✔@michellemalkin

Barr letter re Mueller investigation:
19 lawyers.
40 FBI & professional staff.
2,800+ subpoenas.
500 search warrants
500 witness intvus.
0 evidence of Trump/Russia collusion on elex disinfo campaign.
0 evidence of collusion on hacking.
Big Fat Zero.https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/democrats.judiciary.house.gov/files/documents/AG%20March%2024%202019%20Letter%20to%20House%20and%20Senate%20Judiciary%20Committees.pdf …





Bret Baier

✔@BretBaier

No matter your ideology or your loyalties -this is a good day for America. No American conspired or cooperated w/ Russia in its efforts to interfere w/ the 2016 election-according to the Special Counsel’s report. There will be a lot to mull over but that is the bottom line




Well, heck.....the Democrats can always campaign on this:
.... full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…